See More on Facebook

Opinion, Politics

In a democracy, you must learn to tolerate

An editorial by Shakhawat Liton in the Daily Star looks at the role that media must play in a thriving democracy and its place in holding those in power accountable.

Written by

Updated: March 5, 2018

The above quote is a strong and clear manifestation of the Indian Supreme Court’s endeavour to protect rights of the media as it recently announced that freedom of speech and expression of the media must be allowed to the fullest and the press may not be hauled up for defamation for “some errors” in its reporting.

What does the phrase “some errors” mean? The apex court on January 8 in a defamation case clarified by saying: “There could be some error or enthusiasm in reporting an alleged scam. But, we must allow freedom of speech and expression to press at the fullest. There may be some wrong reporting. For that they need not be hauled up for defamation,” according to Times of India.

In response to a petitioner who moved to the court to revive a defamation case against a journalist, the SC bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra made another significant call: “In a democracy, you (petitioner) must learn to tolerate.” The apex court also refused to entertain an appeal against a Patna High Court order quashing a defamation complaint against a journalist and a media house. By rejecting the appeal, the Indian apex court unequivocally made it clear that an alleged incorrect news item about a scam does not amount to defamation.

Earlier, in March 2015 the SC of India delivered a big boost to freedom of expression in social media. It declared Section 66A of the Information Technology Act—similar to Section 57 of our ICT Act—unconstitutional and struck it down. This section had been widely misused by police in various states to arrest innocent persons for posting critical comments about social and political issues and political leaders on social networking sites.

According to Times of India, in the verdict the apex court said such a law hit at the root of liberty and freedom of expression, the two cardinal pillars of democracy. The court said the section has to be erased from the law books as it has gone much beyond the reasonable restrictions put by the constitution on freedom of speech.

Over the years the apex court of India delivered many verdicts and orders to protect freedom of speech, expression and press. But its latest order on the defamation issue should be considered as epoch-making. This may be likened to the US Supreme Court’s landmark verdict delivered in the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan case around 54 years ago, which upheld the freedom of the press. In its verdict delivered in 1964, the US apex court, for the first time, introduced the “actual malice” standard. This means the court must find evidence of actual malice before it can hold the press guilty for defamation and libel against a public figure. The plaintiff must prove that the publisher was aware that the statement was false and published it anyway. This places a very high burden of proof on the plaintiff in libel cases.

The background of the case against New York Times may be recalled briefly. In 1960, the New York Times ran an advertisement about Martin Luther King. It contained inaccuracies about the conduct of the Montgomery, Alabama police department. The newspaper alleged that the police department took unlawful action against civil rights protesters. Annoyed by the advertisement, the Montgomery Police Commissioner, LB Sullivan, wrote a letter to the New York Times demanding they run a retraction of the story. New York Times refused to do so. Sullivan filed suit against the newspaper. By introducing the “actual malice” standard, the Supreme Court not only held that the New York Times was not guilty of libel, but also opened up many opportunities for news sources to print stories about the civil rights cases in the South.

Now, we may recall the background of the case on which the top court of India on January 8 stepped in to protect the rights of the press. A woman, who mentioned in the petition that she was the daughter of a senior and reputed bureaucrat and that her mother was a minister in the Bihar government, had challenged a judgment of Patna High Court that quashed cognisance taken by a magistrate of her defamation complaint. In the case she had filed with the magistrate court, she accused reputed journalists of telecasting incorrect news defaming her and family members. The news report, aired in April 2010, had alleged irregular allotment of land in Bihiya Industrial Area by Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority to her for establishing a proposed food processing unit. She had alleged that the Hindi TV news channel had made some specific “scandalous and derogatory” comments against her and her parents forcing her to file a defamation complaint, according to the Times of India.

When her counsel challenged the HC decision, a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra verbally observed: “The case has continued since 2011. The persons have spent a lot of time and money in defending themselves. An alleged incorrect news item about a scam does not amount to defamation.”

The SC’s order rejecting the appeal has been widely lauded by the press and freethinkers. This will not only contribute to improving the state of freedom of expression and the press but also boost confidence of news outlets which are often hesitant to run investigative reports fearing that they will be dragged into a defamation case.

Investigative reports are always helpful for the government in ensuring the welfare of the people and fighting graft. A free media is never an enemy of such a government. We may therefore take lessons from the above examples set by the Supreme Court of India and the US to protect media from the mindless abuse of defamation laws. Such moves will surely have immense impact on fighting graft and upholding human rights, including the right to freedom of speech and expression.

(This article was written by Shakhawat Liton and appears in the Daily Star Newspaper)

Enjoyed this story? Share it.

ANN Members
About the Author: Asia News Network is a regional media alliance comprising 24 media entities.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia

Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.

By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Opinion, Politics

Xi: Step up fight against corruption

The president calls for more measures to be taken against corruption. Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, called on Friday for all-around efforts to fight corruption and improve the nation’s oversight system to secure even greater strategic outcomes in full and strict governance over the Party. Xi, China’s president and chairman of the Central Military Commission, made the remark at the third plenary session of the 19th CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection in Beijing. The sweeping victory that has been secured in the anti-graft campaign must be consolidated by strengthening deterrence so that officials “don’t dare to, are unable to and have no desire to” commit acts of corruption, Xi said. To this end, anti-corruption efforts in financial fields should be stepped up, particularly in key projects, areas and posi

By China Daily
January 14, 2019

Opinion, Politics

Fugitive Jho Low says no connection between 1Mdb and China

Jho Low rubbishes Wall Street Journal report about China’s alleged role in 1MDB probe. Fugitive businessman Jho Low has dismissed a report by the Wall Street Journal linking China to Malaysian state investment fund 1MDB as “a continuation of a trial by media” led by Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad. The Journal said in a report on Monday (Jan 7) that senior Chinese leaders offered in 2016 to help bail out 1Malaysia Development Berhad or 1MDB, which is at the centre of a swelling, multi-billion-dollar graft scandal. The report cited minutes from a series of previously undisclosed meetings. Chinese officials told visiting Malaysians that China would use its influence to try to get the United States and other countries to drop their probes of allegations

By The Straits Times
January 10, 2019

Opinion, Politics

Malaysian rulers to pick new king by the month’s end

Previous king stepped down in unprecedented move on Sunday. Malaysia’s Conference of Rulers will meet in about two weeks’ time to elect the country’s new constitutional monarch and his deputy after the King, Sultan Muhammad V, stepped down on Sunday in an unprecedented move. The 16th King, or Supreme Ruler, and his deputy will be sworn in at the end of the month, Keeper of the Royal Seal Syed Danial Syed Ahmad said in a press statement. Yesterday morning, six of Malaysia’s nine ruling monarchs held a meeting at the national palace, Istana Negara, following Sultan Muhammad’s decision to step down as the Malaysian King. “The rulers att

By The Straits Times
January 8, 2019

Opinion, Politics

Taiwan’s ruling party DPP elects moderate as new chairman

The by-election comes after a disastrous local election cycle where the pro-independence party lost heavily. Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) elected a new chairman on Sunday (Jan 6), choosing a moderate to fill up the post vacated by President Tsai Ing-wen after the party’s disappointing performance in recent polls. Mr Cho Jung-tai, a consensus candidate backed by major party figures, took 72.6 per cent or 24,699 of the ballots cast by party members, according to Taiwan’s Central News Agency (CNA). The former Cabinet secretary-general comfortably defeated Mr You Ying-lung, an openly pro-independence rival who supported a re

By The Straits Times
January 7, 2019

Opinion, Politics

Preview: A year of elections for Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia will have a busy political calendar in 2019 with voters in Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines heading to the polls within the year. Thailand In December, Thailand lifted its ban on political activity that has been in place for the past four years as the kingdom prepares for a general election on Feb 24—the country’s first in eight years. The last election the country attempted, in 2014, was sabotaged by anti-government protesters acted to prevent the Pheu Thai Party and its head Yingluck Shinawatra from returning to power. Pheu Thai went on to be ousted by a coup led by then-army chief General Prayut Chan-o-cha and has spent the last five years under military rule. Since then, the military junta has rewritten the Thai Constitution in a wa

By Quinn Libson
January 7, 2019

Opinion, Politics

Previewing Sheikh Hasina’s fourth term

A unanimous poll decision leaves Sheikh Hasina with many decisions to make. It is the huge gaps in the numbers of votes polled by the winners and the losers in the 11th national election that apparently unveiled a “controlled and patterned” nature of the process of polls. A foreign media commentator wondered why any “control” was exercised over BNP activists since the announcement of election schedule in September last. In his opinion, the ruling coalition or Mahajote contestants would have won by a handsome margin without keeping BNP workers at bay anyway! More so when the BNP was waffling and unprepared! In fact, a hundred BNP candidates’ deposits have been forfeited as they couldn’t even secure one-tenth of their adversaries’ tally. In BNP’s last election debacle when they had around 30 seats, deposits of only 10 contestants were forfeited. But I have

By Daily Star
January 4, 2019