See More on Facebook

Opinion, Politics

In a democracy, you must learn to tolerate

An editorial by Shakhawat Liton in the Daily Star looks at the role that media must play in a thriving democracy and its place in holding those in power accountable.


Written by

Updated: March 5, 2018

The above quote is a strong and clear manifestation of the Indian Supreme Court’s endeavour to protect rights of the media as it recently announced that freedom of speech and expression of the media must be allowed to the fullest and the press may not be hauled up for defamation for “some errors” in its reporting.

What does the phrase “some errors” mean? The apex court on January 8 in a defamation case clarified by saying: “There could be some error or enthusiasm in reporting an alleged scam. But, we must allow freedom of speech and expression to press at the fullest. There may be some wrong reporting. For that they need not be hauled up for defamation,” according to Times of India.

In response to a petitioner who moved to the court to revive a defamation case against a journalist, the SC bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra made another significant call: “In a democracy, you (petitioner) must learn to tolerate.” The apex court also refused to entertain an appeal against a Patna High Court order quashing a defamation complaint against a journalist and a media house. By rejecting the appeal, the Indian apex court unequivocally made it clear that an alleged incorrect news item about a scam does not amount to defamation.

Earlier, in March 2015 the SC of India delivered a big boost to freedom of expression in social media. It declared Section 66A of the Information Technology Act—similar to Section 57 of our ICT Act—unconstitutional and struck it down. This section had been widely misused by police in various states to arrest innocent persons for posting critical comments about social and political issues and political leaders on social networking sites.

According to Times of India, in the verdict the apex court said such a law hit at the root of liberty and freedom of expression, the two cardinal pillars of democracy. The court said the section has to be erased from the law books as it has gone much beyond the reasonable restrictions put by the constitution on freedom of speech.

Over the years the apex court of India delivered many verdicts and orders to protect freedom of speech, expression and press. But its latest order on the defamation issue should be considered as epoch-making. This may be likened to the US Supreme Court’s landmark verdict delivered in the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan case around 54 years ago, which upheld the freedom of the press. In its verdict delivered in 1964, the US apex court, for the first time, introduced the “actual malice” standard. This means the court must find evidence of actual malice before it can hold the press guilty for defamation and libel against a public figure. The plaintiff must prove that the publisher was aware that the statement was false and published it anyway. This places a very high burden of proof on the plaintiff in libel cases.

The background of the case against New York Times may be recalled briefly. In 1960, the New York Times ran an advertisement about Martin Luther King. It contained inaccuracies about the conduct of the Montgomery, Alabama police department. The newspaper alleged that the police department took unlawful action against civil rights protesters. Annoyed by the advertisement, the Montgomery Police Commissioner, LB Sullivan, wrote a letter to the New York Times demanding they run a retraction of the story. New York Times refused to do so. Sullivan filed suit against the newspaper. By introducing the “actual malice” standard, the Supreme Court not only held that the New York Times was not guilty of libel, but also opened up many opportunities for news sources to print stories about the civil rights cases in the South.

Now, we may recall the background of the case on which the top court of India on January 8 stepped in to protect the rights of the press. A woman, who mentioned in the petition that she was the daughter of a senior and reputed bureaucrat and that her mother was a minister in the Bihar government, had challenged a judgment of Patna High Court that quashed cognisance taken by a magistrate of her defamation complaint. In the case she had filed with the magistrate court, she accused reputed journalists of telecasting incorrect news defaming her and family members. The news report, aired in April 2010, had alleged irregular allotment of land in Bihiya Industrial Area by Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority to her for establishing a proposed food processing unit. She had alleged that the Hindi TV news channel had made some specific “scandalous and derogatory” comments against her and her parents forcing her to file a defamation complaint, according to the Times of India.

When her counsel challenged the HC decision, a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra verbally observed: “The case has continued since 2011. The persons have spent a lot of time and money in defending themselves. An alleged incorrect news item about a scam does not amount to defamation.”

The SC’s order rejecting the appeal has been widely lauded by the press and freethinkers. This will not only contribute to improving the state of freedom of expression and the press but also boost confidence of news outlets which are often hesitant to run investigative reports fearing that they will be dragged into a defamation case.

Investigative reports are always helpful for the government in ensuring the welfare of the people and fighting graft. A free media is never an enemy of such a government. We may therefore take lessons from the above examples set by the Supreme Court of India and the US to protect media from the mindless abuse of defamation laws. Such moves will surely have immense impact on fighting graft and upholding human rights, including the right to freedom of speech and expression.

(This article was written by Shakhawat Liton and appears in the Daily Star Newspaper)



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


ANN Members
About the Author: Asia News Network is a regional media alliance comprising 24 media entities.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Opinion, Politics

In any other country, govt. would have resigned

Saman Indrajith argues that the Sri Lankan government should have resigned. The entire government would have resigned if a disaster like the Easter Sunday carnage had happened in any other country, but such things would never happen in Sri Lanka, Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka told Parliament, yesterday. Participating in the debate on gazette declaring a state of emergency, Field Marshal Fonseka severely criticised both the government and the Opposition for allowing the deterioration of intelligence services. He said that soon after the end of the war in 2009, he had proposed to build a national intelligence agency combining all intelligence units and divisions and to make it the best in South Asia. But no such thing had happened. Instead, the intelligence operatives had been used to stalk and surveillance of political enemies and their children, the former Army Commander said. Fonseka said: “


By The Island
April 25, 2019

Opinion, Politics

Pro democracy candidate charged by Thailand’s election commission

The EC accuse a pro-democracy leader of holding media shares while running for office. The Election Commission (EC) yesterday unanimously resolved to press a charge against Future Forward Party leader Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit over alleged violation of media shareholding rules. Citing investigations by two EC panels, Sawang Boonmee, the EC deputy secretary-general, told a press conference that Thanathorn had allegedly violated the law by owning or holding 675,000 shares in V-Luck Media Company while registering as a candidate for the general election. “Thanathorn’s share certificate number is from 1350001 to 2025000,” said Sawang, referring to the findings of two panels the EC had set up to investigate the case. Thanathorn was accus


By Cod Satrusayang
April 24, 2019

Opinion, Politics

PM Imran’s statement in Iran comes under intense opposition attack

Khan said in Tehran that Pakistan has been used as a staging area for attacks in Iran. Prime Minister Imran Khan’s public acknowledgement in Tehran that terrorists had in the past misused Pakistani territory to undertake attacks against Iran came under a blistering attack by the opposition in the National Assembly on Tuesday. Human Rights Minister Dr Shireen Mazari defended the prime minister, saying his statement was being quoted out of context. In an unprecedented, albeit bold move, Imran, while speaking at a joint press conference with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani after a round of talks on Monday, had said: “I know Iran has suffered from terrorism [perpetrated] by groups operating from Pakistan. …we [need to] have trust in each other that both countries will not allow any terrorist activity fr


By Dawn
April 24, 2019

Opinion, Politics

Japan’s ruling party loses by-elections

LDP loses 2 lower house by-elections. Candidates of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party lost in both of Sunday’s House of Representatives by-elections, in Osaka Constituency No. 12 and Okinawa Constituency No. 3, according to preliminary reports by The Yomiuri Shimbun. The results could serve as a harbinger of the House of Councillors elections this summer and show how the Cabinet of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is being evaluated. In Osaka, the by-election was held following the death of the LDP’s Tomokatsu Kitagawa, who was the former state minister of the environment. Fumitake Fujita, 38, of Nippon Ishin no Kai secured the seat after beating three other competitors, including the LDP’s Shinpei Kitakawa, 32, also supported by junior coalition partner Komeito. Other contenders were Takeshi Miyamoto, 59, an independent and former lower hous


By The Japan News
April 22, 2019

Opinion, Politics

Feud between ruling and opposition bloc deepens in Korea

The opposition party is reorganizing and assembling as pressure builds on Moon Jae-in. The friction between the ruling bloc and the main opposition Liberty Korea Party is showing signs of intensifying following a conservative rally Saturday. On Saturday, estimated 20,000 conservatives gathered in central Seoul in a rally organized by the Liberty Korea Party. The party’s rally, the first major demonstration organized by the party since Hwang Kyo-ahn took office as its leader, was joined by members of smaller conservative groups supporting former President Park Geun-hye. Hwang Kyo-ahn (center), head of the main opposition Liberty Korea Party, and members of the conservative


By The Korea Herald
April 22, 2019

Opinion, Politics

Asian press freedom under threat

Some common themes and little optimism as press freedom takes a back seat in Asia. The media advocacy group, Reporters without Borders—also known by its international name Reporters Sans Frontières, or RSF—released its 2019 World Press Freedom Index on Thursday. The report tells a bleak story of the future of news ecosystems around the world, and warns of increasing danger for the men and women who have made reporting the news their jobs. The index’s assessment of Asia-Pacific’s press freedom describes an atmosphere of increasing cyber harassment, physical danger and intimidation for reporters—factors that unsurprisingly have led to growing levels self-censorship across the region. A look at a the state of press freedom in a few countries around the region reveals some recurring patterns: Legal systems have been increasingly wielded as weapons by governments to silence media outlets and indiv


By Quinn Libson
April 21, 2019