See More on Facebook

Opinion, Politics

In a democracy, you must learn to tolerate

An editorial by Shakhawat Liton in the Daily Star looks at the role that media must play in a thriving democracy and its place in holding those in power accountable.


Written by

Updated: March 5, 2018

The above quote is a strong and clear manifestation of the Indian Supreme Court’s endeavour to protect rights of the media as it recently announced that freedom of speech and expression of the media must be allowed to the fullest and the press may not be hauled up for defamation for “some errors” in its reporting.

What does the phrase “some errors” mean? The apex court on January 8 in a defamation case clarified by saying: “There could be some error or enthusiasm in reporting an alleged scam. But, we must allow freedom of speech and expression to press at the fullest. There may be some wrong reporting. For that they need not be hauled up for defamation,” according to Times of India.

In response to a petitioner who moved to the court to revive a defamation case against a journalist, the SC bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra made another significant call: “In a democracy, you (petitioner) must learn to tolerate.” The apex court also refused to entertain an appeal against a Patna High Court order quashing a defamation complaint against a journalist and a media house. By rejecting the appeal, the Indian apex court unequivocally made it clear that an alleged incorrect news item about a scam does not amount to defamation.

Earlier, in March 2015 the SC of India delivered a big boost to freedom of expression in social media. It declared Section 66A of the Information Technology Act—similar to Section 57 of our ICT Act—unconstitutional and struck it down. This section had been widely misused by police in various states to arrest innocent persons for posting critical comments about social and political issues and political leaders on social networking sites.

According to Times of India, in the verdict the apex court said such a law hit at the root of liberty and freedom of expression, the two cardinal pillars of democracy. The court said the section has to be erased from the law books as it has gone much beyond the reasonable restrictions put by the constitution on freedom of speech.

Over the years the apex court of India delivered many verdicts and orders to protect freedom of speech, expression and press. But its latest order on the defamation issue should be considered as epoch-making. This may be likened to the US Supreme Court’s landmark verdict delivered in the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan case around 54 years ago, which upheld the freedom of the press. In its verdict delivered in 1964, the US apex court, for the first time, introduced the “actual malice” standard. This means the court must find evidence of actual malice before it can hold the press guilty for defamation and libel against a public figure. The plaintiff must prove that the publisher was aware that the statement was false and published it anyway. This places a very high burden of proof on the plaintiff in libel cases.

The background of the case against New York Times may be recalled briefly. In 1960, the New York Times ran an advertisement about Martin Luther King. It contained inaccuracies about the conduct of the Montgomery, Alabama police department. The newspaper alleged that the police department took unlawful action against civil rights protesters. Annoyed by the advertisement, the Montgomery Police Commissioner, LB Sullivan, wrote a letter to the New York Times demanding they run a retraction of the story. New York Times refused to do so. Sullivan filed suit against the newspaper. By introducing the “actual malice” standard, the Supreme Court not only held that the New York Times was not guilty of libel, but also opened up many opportunities for news sources to print stories about the civil rights cases in the South.

Now, we may recall the background of the case on which the top court of India on January 8 stepped in to protect the rights of the press. A woman, who mentioned in the petition that she was the daughter of a senior and reputed bureaucrat and that her mother was a minister in the Bihar government, had challenged a judgment of Patna High Court that quashed cognisance taken by a magistrate of her defamation complaint. In the case she had filed with the magistrate court, she accused reputed journalists of telecasting incorrect news defaming her and family members. The news report, aired in April 2010, had alleged irregular allotment of land in Bihiya Industrial Area by Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority to her for establishing a proposed food processing unit. She had alleged that the Hindi TV news channel had made some specific “scandalous and derogatory” comments against her and her parents forcing her to file a defamation complaint, according to the Times of India.

When her counsel challenged the HC decision, a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra verbally observed: “The case has continued since 2011. The persons have spent a lot of time and money in defending themselves. An alleged incorrect news item about a scam does not amount to defamation.”

The SC’s order rejecting the appeal has been widely lauded by the press and freethinkers. This will not only contribute to improving the state of freedom of expression and the press but also boost confidence of news outlets which are often hesitant to run investigative reports fearing that they will be dragged into a defamation case.

Investigative reports are always helpful for the government in ensuring the welfare of the people and fighting graft. A free media is never an enemy of such a government. We may therefore take lessons from the above examples set by the Supreme Court of India and the US to protect media from the mindless abuse of defamation laws. Such moves will surely have immense impact on fighting graft and upholding human rights, including the right to freedom of speech and expression.

(This article was written by Shakhawat Liton and appears in the Daily Star Newspaper)



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


ANN Members
About the Author: Asia News Network is a regional media alliance comprising 24 media entities.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Opinion, Politics

Opinion: One Belt, One Road: We must secure our interest

Shah Husain Imam argues in the Daily Star that Bangladesh must put its interests first in joining China’s One Belt, One Road initiative. The ancient Silk Road, of which the Belt and Road Initiative is a gigantic new avatar, dates back to the Chinese Han Dynasty’s westward expansion more than 2100 years ago. The Road derived its name from the lucrative silk trade along the routes through which it branched into what are today the central Asian countries Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, as well as present-day Pakistan and India to the south. These routes eventually spanned 4,000 miles to Europe. Interestingly, silk was regarded as more precious than gold as a commodity in those times as if to convey the misty romanticism with the old world charm about a fine fabric. At any rate, the Silk Road by no means offered silken smooth passage to travellers like Marco P


By Daily Star
September 21, 2018

Opinion, Politics

Abe wins 3rd term as president of ruling LDP

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was reelected president of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party for a third consecutive term on Thursday. “I will put all my strength and soul into fulfilling my duty,” Abe said after his victory. A total of 810 votes were cast in the LDP presidential poll, half by Diet lawmakers and half by rank-and-file party members. After securing the support of five LDP factions, led respectively by Hiroyuki Hosoda, Taro Aso, Fumio Kishida, Toshihiro Nikai and Nobuteru Ishihara, Abe won 329 of the 405 votes from LDP lawmakers, against 73 votes for Ishiba. Voting from rank-and-file party members closed on Wednesday. Abe won 224 votes of the 405 votes available from rank-and-file party members, while Ishiba won 181. At a press conference later on the same day, Abe said he intends to reshu


By The Japan News
September 21, 2018

Opinion, Politics

A land with no smiles

The Thai middle class’ Faustian bargain with the military is hampering true democracy in the country. Almost ten years ago, I met a protester on the streets of Bangkok. It was a time of protest and political instability with the drama between the government and protesters spilling out onto the streets. To protect his identity against possible military reprisal, let us call him Nadech. Nadech will unlikely be recorded in history books, he was not a political leader, nor a despotic general or any other archetype of Thai history. He was a simple junk-store hawker, an occupation that involves going from house to house and sorting garbage to sell. His family had done well enough through grit and hard work to open a small convenience store in his home province. Nadech had taken to the streets in 2010 because he had believed the promises that exiled Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra had made and had seen, fi


By Cod Satrusayang
September 21, 2018

Opinion, Politics

New airport construction adds to China’s influence in the Maldives

Maldives airport opened a new runway constructed by China this week, a sign of Beijing’s growing influence on the island nation. Maldives airport opened its newly developed Code F runway at the Velana International Airport on Tuesday after two years of construction by Chinese firms. According to Chinese state media, the new runway is a milestone project of the Belt and Road Initiative. The contract for the airport expansion, including the development of the fuel farm, a cargo terminal, and the new runway, was signed between China and the Maldives in 2014, Xinhua News Agency reported. Constructed by Beijing Urban Construction Group, a large international construction group based in China, the new runway is 3,400 meters long and 60 meters wide. It is the latest push by China to gain influence over the politically troubled nation. Earlier this year, Maldivian President Abdulla Y


By Cod Satrusayang
September 20, 2018

Opinion, Politics

Former Pakistan prime minister Nawaz Sharif released from jail

Nawaz Sharif and his family were released from Adiala jail on Wednesday after the Islamabad High Court suspended their respective prison sentences in the Avenfield corruption case earlier in the day. PML-N Pr


By Dawn
September 20, 2018

Opinion, Politics

El Salvador ups pressure on Taiwan relations

Prosecutors in El Salvador to investigate the alleged graft of some $10 million in funds donated by Taiwan. El Salvador announced it would sever ties with Taiwan and switch its allegiance to Beijing on 21th August. The loss of the Central American country reduces the number of Taiwan’s formal diplomatic allies to just 17. Now the current president of El Salvador, Sanchez Ceren, is accused that he won the election by relying on partial fund which was donated by Taiwan in 2014. Prosecutor Douglas Melendez said in a TV interview that Taiwan gave $38 million to El Salvador for various projects, but the fund was used in a partisan campaign by Mauricio Funes in election won by current President Salvador Sanchez Ceren, the presidential candidate of the FMLN party in 2014. The FMLN party calling the accusations “baseless” and accusing Melendez of “attacking our candidate and o


By Asia News Network
September 20, 2018