See More on Facebook

Opinion

From dependence to interdependence

An editorial from the Kathmandu Post looks at the relationship between Nepal and India.


Written by

Updated: March 14, 2018

Prof Mahendra P Lama of Jawaharlal Nehru University is a highly regarded academic and intellectual, and is well known in South Asia. He recently published an article in The Kathmandu Post analysing the unique relationship between Nepal and India with the hope that it “could thus move from dependence to interdependence”.

Lama outlines four interactive terrains between Nepal and India, namely people-to-people level, civil society level, business-commercial level and government level.

The big idea is that the government-to-government relationship should help integrate the three other terrains so that there is “Neighbourhood Nirvana”. Clearly, the government-to-governmental level has an important role, and is an important determining variable in the whole process.

It is true that the relationship between Nepal and India has always remained deep and friendly at the people-to-people level. There is an invisible civilisational link that binds us all the way from the misty heights and the splendour and magnificence of the Himalayas (Himabat Khand), the abode of Lord Shiva, Muktinath and Pashupatinath to Bishwonath and Rameswaram in India.

No government or leader in either country can change this reality. Nevertheless, a transition – in Lama’s words “from dependence to interdependence” – in line with the new imperatives of the 21st century requires that we attempt to understand each other’s national interests and try to define a common space where we can work together for the benefit and prosperity of our peoples.

The tenor and strength of Nepal-India relations is an integrated whole consisting of four elements, and they are: political, economic, security and culture.

A proper appreciation and analysis of all the four elements, keeping in perspective the geostrategic reality of the region, can be the way forward in the future.

Emphasising one or the other while ignoring the totality gives a partial perspective that can be either highly sentimental or deeply dysfunctional. For example, consider the relationship between Nepal and India during the last few years. When there was an earthquake in Nepal two years ago, India was the first country to respond with humanitarian help.

Within hours of the disaster, Prime Minister Modi was in touch with Nepal’s prime minister, and the Indian government was ready to provide all necessary assistance. This was a magnanimous gesture befitting a great nation, and it was deeply appreciated by the Nepali people.

And yet the same government, a few months later, was seen by many in Nepal as being involved in a crude model of coercive diplomacy (the unannounced blockade) because the views of an Indian diplomat on the new Nepali constitution that was going to be promulgated did not find a favourable response among Nepali politicians, one of whom is now the prime minister of the country, and the second is impatiently waiting for his turn within the next five years.

How could a friendly nation, that was so big-hearted and generous after the earthquake suddenly adopt a policy that ignored the pain and suffering of millions of people just next door? This is a riddle that remains unsolved.

The essential point is that a dialogue on the perception of national interests between the two countries is essential if our people-to-people and business-to-business relationships are to be the basis of our partnership in the future.

Politically, both Nepal and India are committed to liberal democratic values and institutions. Therefore, a politically stable and democratic Nepal is the best guarantee that India can have for a strong friend in its north that remains sensitive to its national interests.

Any manoeuvring that goes against this logic will yield results that will be dysfunctional for both nations and will only put negative pressures on the other terrains that Lama mentions in his paper.

Similarly, on the economic front which should also include the exploitation of Himalayan water resources for the benefit of both nations, a serious dialogue on the nature of the evolving relationship is in order.

If one looks at the structure of the trade relationship between Nepal and India, it comes close to a mercantilist model of the 19th century that is simply not sustainable in the future.

If we are all serious about Neighbourhood Nirvana, perhaps we should jointly put more emphasis on the economics of the neighbourhood, which seems to be neglected in our region.

As the leader of the pack, India should not hesitate to think of innovative strategies that provide space to all South Asian nations to be partners in the growth trajectory of its economy. In practical terms, Nepal and India should come up with ideas that help Nepal to obtain a share of the value supply chain in South Asia.

This would help Nepal become more than a nation that is a market for Indian manufactured goods while sending its young men to work as cheap labour in the Middle East to manage the ever-increasing trade deficit.

Sadly, this focus has been missing among Nepali leaders, and the often-reported use of non-tariff barriers by India does not help to generate an atmosphere of vibrant business-to-business relationship that Lama emphasises in his paper.

What will be needed for Neighbourhood Nirvana in the future is a dynamic approach that will link the industrial development of Nepal with the rapid growth of the Indian economy based on the logic of product sharing and product fragmentation that is very much a part of the globalisation phenomena that has gained momentum in the last few decades.

A determined move in this direction was undertaken in the Trade Treaty in the mid-1990s between the two countries. However, the basic thrust of this treaty was ignored after five years when a new treaty was signed. Perhaps it is time to take a look at that treaty again as a basis for future direction.

Similarly, on the question of connectivity, the historic agreement between Nepal and India allowing the use of Indian territory from Kakarbhitta in Nepal to reach Bangladesh was a breakthrough widely appreciated for its new thrust on regional connectivity. And yet, after almost 20 years, its potential remains unused.

A vision for tomorrow requires not only stability in Nepal’s relationship with India but also a willingness for renewal and growth that is focused on the prosperity and welfare of the people of both countries.

In order to strengthen trust and goodwill at all levels, both countries should be prepared to take new initiatives to review and then renew their relationship in view of changing geopolitics, technology and production systems.

A willingness for this kind of renewal should form the foundation of growth in our relationship. Take, for example, the Peace and Friendship Treaty of 1950. The notion of stability requires that, no matter which party comes to power, our commitment to peace and friendship between our two peoples will not change.

However, the expression of national interests between two sovereign nations will require a willingness to review and, if needed, alter the various processes, mechanism and structures in line with the changing requirements of time. This is the only way for the growth of a relationship to eliminate the trust deficit and move from dependence to interdependence in the future.

(This article was written by Prakash Chandra Lohani and originally appeared in the Kathmandu Post)



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


ANN Members
About the Author: Asia News Network is a regional media alliance comprising 24 media entities.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Opinion

China slams outside meddling, provocation in South China Sea

China called upon states bordering the South China Sea to jointly work with Beijing to guard against external interference and disruption. Some countries outside the region constantly stir up trouble and brandish forces in the South China Sea, which goes against efforts made by China, the Philippines and other regional states to maintain peace and promote mutually beneficial cooperation, said Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said at a news conference with Philippine Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr in the southern Philippine city of Davao. Regional countries should remain vigilant against such interference, and continue deepening solidarity and cooperation to build the South China Sea into a sea of peace, friendship and cooperation, and not leave any opportunity for outside forces to exploit the situation, he said. Wang said China will discuss with the Philippines joint exploration of oil and


By China Daily
October 30, 2018

Opinion

A word against regulation

Regulation of social media, like regulation of the press, should not be attempted less it offer another way for despots to control their population. When the printing press first began spreading throughout Europe in the 15thand 16thcenturies, it brought with it a revolution in and democratization of ideas. Scripture and scientific text were spread rapidly and was readily accessible to the masses for the first time. The church’s role as the gatekeepers and purveyors of information lessened with the advent of new technology. Upheaval was not far behind and the printing press played a central role in the reformation led by Martin Luther and the split of the Catholic Church. At this time, the leadership of the church tried to suppress the dissemination of these ideas and the technology which allowed them to flourish. But their attempts were in vain and the world entered a new epoch, one which eventually g


By Cod Satrusayang
October 29, 2018

Opinion

Asia News Network calls for the immediate release of the three Eleven Media editors 

Asia News Network statement on the arrest of Eleven Media senior staff. We, the members of the Asia News Network, express solidarity with our arrested colleagues from Eleven Media Group, Managing Editor Nari Min, Editor in Chief Kyaw Zaw Linn, and Chief Reporter Phyo Wai Win and condemn their arrest under provisions of the law that allow no bail. All three were arrested on October 10 in Yangon for their investigation and coverage of the controversial business ventures of the Yangon Regional Government. They were charged under Article 505 (b) of Myanmar’s Penal Code, which does not allow the grant of bail and carries a maximum punishment of two years imprisonment. Asia News Network, an alliance of 24 leading media in 20 Asian countries, stands by the three journalists – not because the Yangon Regional


By ANN Members
October 12, 2018

Opinion

The Marcos family’s last gasp

With President Duterte in power, the Marcos family is ascendant in Philippine national politics again. The remains of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos have been buried at the national heroes’ cemetery; his only son and namesake has a live election protest against the incumbent vice president; his eldest daughter Imee, the governor of his home province of Ilocos Norte, is polling well among likely candidates for the Senate; and his wife Imelda, at 89, is on her third term as representative of the Marcos’ old congressional bailiwick. But despite the obvious support of a still-popular president and a slick, long-running, well-funded social media operation promoting the Marcos worldview, the Duterte era may turn out to be the Marcos family’s last gasp. These years may be their last opportunity to win back the presidency and everything that goes with it. It will certainly not be for lack of trying, o


By ANN Members
October 8, 2018

Opinion

Pakistan has a Saudi Arabia question it needs to answer

Pakistan needs Saudi money but not its geopolitics. The long-standing strategic alliance between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia has taken on a new dimension with prospects of the kingdom participating in CPEC projects. The Saudis have reportedly also shown an interest in investing in the oil, energy and mineral sectors. The new Pakistani government is looking to Riyadh to bail it out of its financial woes. It is evident that the chill in relations between the two allies in recent years has diminished. It was significant that Prime Minister Imran Khan chose Riyadh for his first foreign visit within four weeks of coming to power, thus breaking his pledge of not travelling abroad in his first three months in office. The warm welcome given to the new Pakistani prime minister signalled a fresh beginning and t


By Dawn
October 4, 2018

Opinion

Dialogue is only way to resolve Kashmir issue

The only way to end an ongoing, bloody conflict in Kashmir is for both sides to come to the table. India and Pakistan will not talk. Pakistan wants to talk “Kashmir”. India wants to talk “terror”. Yet they will not talk. The baggage of history weighs heavy on us. The status quo stays. Kashmir bleeds and we the people of Kashmir will continue to pay a heavy price. Not that the people of India and Pakistan will not pay. Of course they too will. We are all paying a high price for this utterly mindless status quo which is seen as politically safe by the ruling elite (whether in power or out of power) in India and in Pakistan. Any shift is compromise which amounts to treason. For the past seven decades the people of Kashmir remain trapped in this rhetoric of the status quo, living a life of bondage in the world


By Dawn
October 1, 2018