See More on Facebook

Opinion

From a high moral ground to a high legal perch

That Bangladesh offered a safe haven to close to a million Rohingya refugees fleeing wholesale persecution from Myanmar put Dhaka on a high moral pedestal.


Written by

Updated: June 1, 2018

Bangladesh’s humanitarian position got her accolades, even though moral and material support fell short of exerting any effective pressure on Myanmar to take back their abandoned nationals.

All that was, in fact, soured by a certain resigned attitude of the regional/international players that the refugees are there in Bangladesh for the long haul. Countries with levers to press on Myanmar to behave in a civilised, responsible manner chose not to, pampering the junta to a point of being a perpetual regional bully boy!

It is time for the international legal system to end the impunity culture of the recalcitrant Burmese regime. For this to happen, the Rome Statute, the bed-rock of the International Criminal Court (ICC), is going to be invoked at long last.

Presumably, it has the stamp of the use of motu proprio power by the ICC to investigate the crimes in question. The ICC has taken up the matter of its own volition realising its gravity—there was no UNSC referral nor any move that we know of from the Bangladesh side with the ICC.

Needless to say, the ICC initiative presents Bangladesh, a party to the Rome Statute, with an opportunity to hold Myanmar to account through international legal means.

With that hopefully in prospect, Bangladesh will be poised to move from the high moral ground to the high legal ground.

The preamble to the Rome Statute affirmed that “the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished” and there should be determination “to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators and thus to contribute to prevention of such crimes.”

The procedure followed in a bid to invoke the Rome Statute which repudiates “deportation or forcible transfer of population” as crime against humanity is as meticulous as it is fair. As a first step, the ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda asked the court to rule on whether it has jurisdiction over the matter. Then, the ICC pre-trial chamber, on May 7, invited Bangladesh to submit written observations by June 11 on whether the court can exercise jurisdiction over forced deportation of Rohingyas from Myanmar to Bangladesh.

Usually one would have expected—since Myanmar triggered a wholesale exodus—she would be the first to be approached by the court to elicit her opinion on its culpability. But this was not to be because Myanmar is not a state party to the Rome Statute. All the more reason though to subject Myanmar to an ICC investigation. This brings to the fore the compelling necessity for the ICC to gather all information on atrocities before bringing them up to the offending party to establish its guilt. Bangladesh being a repository of evidence deserves to be the first port of call for the ICC as procedural requirement.

Barrister Manzoor Hasan in these columns on Tuesday put the matter of territorial jurisdiction succinctly: “According to the Rome Statute, territorial jurisdiction is not limited to the place where the coercive acts took place, Myanmar in this case, but to all states involved in the deportation across the international border, concluding at the receiving state, Bangladesh in this case.”

There are three valid reasons for Bangladesh to respond to the pre-trial chamber’s letter seeking her opinion on the ICC proposing exercise of jurisdiction over deportation of Rohingyas from Myanmar to Bangladesh: First, as the unfortunate receptacle of the fall-out of Myanmar’s despicable waves of ethnic cleansing; and secondly, as a signatory to the Rome Statute.

Lastly, our own history prods us to demand justice; we suffered from war crimes and brought those responsible to justice, a legacy worth replicating as template to combat the sinister side to human affairs.

Even the states within the ICC which are not party to the Rome Statute—USA, China and Russia—can play a major role in ICC investigations. “They can ensure the ICC to act or prevent countries from cooperation with it.” Again, the ball rolls into the court of super-powers to act in favour of the aggrieved party.

The UNSC used the ICC as a diplomatic instrument to deal with the crisis in Sudan. Three out of five permanent members of the UNSC are not party to the Rome Statute, including the USA. But Washington has been making the right noises for Bangladesh on Rohingya crisis in so many ways. Would the US and India help Bangladesh come out of the repatriation tunnel closed on the receiving side?

The overarching signal we need to put across is a carefully calibrated response in particular to the humanitarian part of the challenge. We need to refrain from conveying a sense of semi-permanence, let alone permanence in our approach to the Rohingya rehabilitation issues. As it is, going by Myanmar’s present indication of an intake of 300 refugees per day, the repatriation process will take up to eight years. But not even a stuttering start has been made yet! Indeed, are we looking for a messiah in the international community not to allow us to be condemned to a long haul?

– Shah Husain Imam is adjunct faculty at East West University, a commentator on current affairs and former Associate Editor, The Daily Star.



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


Daily Star
About the Author: The Daily Star is a leading English-language daily newspaper in Bangladesh.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Opinion

The counter-terrorism challenge in West Asia

A action plan must be hatched and implemented in Pakistan and its surrounding countries. Pakistan has stepped up its anti-militant campaign, apparently to steer clear of being blacklisted by the Financial Action Task Force. Pakistan had already narrowly escaped that listing, with the support of China, Malaysia and Turkey, during the last FATF review meeting held in Orlando, Florida. Read: FATF compliance will require all-out effort Yet the country remains under immense pressure to take action against all militant groups that are proscribed by the UN Security Council. Pakistan has also been viewed as employing a selective approach towards different militant groups. The FATF meeting held in Paris last February had rejected Pakistan’s assessment based on a classification of militant groups into diff


By Dawn
July 15, 2019

Opinion

Arms sales to Taiwan a blow to Sino-US ties

An editorial from Chinese state media about the arms sale to Taiwan. By approving the potential sale of arms worth $2.2 billion to Taiwan, the US State Department has not only further strained cross-Straits relations, it is also trying Beijing’s patience. And by passing a series of acts and resolutions related to Taiwan this year, the US Congress has dealt a serious blow to Sino-US relations, as well as undermined peace and stability across the Straits. The US House of Representatives enacted the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2019 and passed a resolution reaffirming the US’ commitment to Taiwan on May 7, which essentially means the US would sell arms to the island regularly and back its participation in international organizations. That the US has continued to meddle in Taiwan affairs shows it is desperate to use the “Taiwan card” to contain the Chinese mainland. The US believes


By China Daily
July 12, 2019

Opinion

Pakistan’s relations with the US are important but their scope is limited

The leaders of the United States and Pakistan are due to meet later this month. The prime minister will meet the president of the US on July 22. The Foreign Office will prepare essential briefing materials. Leaders ignore them at their peril. Pakistan-US relations are not good. American arrogance of power and Pakistan’s punching above its weight are to blame. The prime minister will need to convince Trump not to blame Pakistan for US failures in Afghanistan and to assure him that he will do his best to enable the US to exit Afghanistan without loss of credibility. This will require actions more than words. Pakistan’s relations with the US are important. But their scope is limited. The benefits of a better relationship with the US, while important, are circumscribed by the priority it gives India as the fulcrum of its Indo-Pacific strategy. This will not cha


By Dawn
July 9, 2019

Opinion

Forging community ties, one friendly gesture at a time

Straits Times Editor in Chief Warren Fernandez writes for ANN’s editor’s circle. Singapore is well known for its Third to First World economic transformation, its efficient, effective Government, as well as for being a very fine, clean and green city. The annual Shangri-La Dialogue, when defence chiefs from many countries gather on the island to thrash out the geopolitical issues of the day, is also well established. Now, thanks to Singapore’s President Halimah Yacob, the Republic might also come to be recognised for its painstaking efforts over the years to foster a society where a disparate people manage to live in peace and harmony, despite their differences in race, language and religion. This did not happen by chance. It took conscious, dogged effort. Political, religious and community leaders made it possible, with the active support of the people. Over time, and th


By Asia News Network
July 8, 2019

Opinion

After the protests, what next? A debate on liberalism

Andrew Sheng writes exclusively for the Asia News Network. The old order is broken.  No less than Russian President Putin has declared the Neoliberal order “obsolete”.   We now have to think the unthinkable – every dream has turned into a nightmare – the land of the free no longer seems to welcome anyone, whilst the freest economy in the world is under siege by massive protests. What is the New Order?  How do we deal with the myriad problems of inequality, climate change, technological disruption to jobs, de-globalization and fragmentation of society?   If everyone protests to hold the rest of society at ransom, how is possible to govern? We can trace this tectonic shift to America’s disorderly abandonment of the order she helped to construct over the last 70 years.   In the last six months, the Tweet Tiger in the White


By Asia News Network
July 8, 2019

Opinion

OPINION: China on maps

Why is China destroying its old maps. Xi Jinping of China is not a person who would take any decision in a hurry — least of all one that affects his country’s security and territorial integrity. Weeks, if not months, must have preceded his momentous decision to destroy all the old maps depicting China’s frontiers and, thus, affirm the existing, current maps as the only ones to be valid. China has land borders with 14 countries and maritime borders with at least nine other countries. The People’s Republic of China was established 70 years ago in 1949. Since 1960, it has settled its boundaries with 12 of the 14 countries with which it shares land borders. They are Myanmar, Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan, Mongolia, Afghanistan, Laos, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Russia. Its land boundaries remain unsettled only with India and Bhutan — with India, actually because Bhutan will proc


By Dawn
July 7, 2019