See More on Facebook

Analysis, Economics

India’s tryst with the goods and services tax

At the stroke of midnight on June 30, 2017, Prime Minister Narendra Modi rolled out India’s biggest and most complex tax reform – a look back on its pluses and minuses.


Written by

Updated: July 3, 2018

India rolled out its biggest tax reform since 1947 – the year it got rid of the British Raj – a year ago on July 1, 2017.

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) had been a long time coming – 13 years to be precise – and was touted as the most significant economic reform unleashed by Narendra Modi after taking over as Prime Minister in 2014.

GST, in its simplest avatar, is a one-tax system for a large country with a population of more than 1 billion. It aims to tidy up the tedious taxation system – with its many layers of comprehensible and incomprehensible cesses and surcharges. However, as most Indians have learned the hard way over the year, GST is not quite the simplistic one-tax system as it was made out to be, but a rather complex tax reform.

A look back at a year of the biggest tax reform and the minuses seem to outweigh the plusses. Two of the biggest takeaways from the new GST regime – the number of registered tax payers has risen phenomenally and tax collections have shot up.

This apart from the obvious benefits such as the elimination of multiple taxes, decreasing prices which have helped the poor and middle classes, increasing transparency and therefore reduction of corruption, and, according to some observers, increased productivity.

However, the failures have been far more – mostly as the reforms were overwhelming and the IT system – the goods and services tax network (GSTN) portal – was ill-equipped to support the process.

A year later, almost everyone is in agreement that India cannot have a single rate GST. The six GST slabs – 0%, 3%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% – have compounded the woes of taxpayers. Refunds are delayed and a return filing system is not in place yet.

Within a year too many changes have been introduced – some for the benefit of taxpayers – yet all this has added to the confusion. According to a report, there have been more than 400 notifications, 100 circulars and FAQs issued so far. Products and services have been moved from one tax bucket to another, the list under 28% tax bracket has been drastically cut, the refund filing mechanism, the due dates and forms have been changed several times.

And there is talk of more changes in the future.

The Background

When the GST was endorsed by Parliament in 2016, it was hailed as a great move to make India a truly single market. However, two years on, businessmen are still nervous, and the government in an overdrive to defend and fix apparent loopholes.

Prime Minister Modi has had to deal with bad press all along. Reams have been written zeroing in on the flaws of GST with many claiming the smooth implementation of the new tax regime can only be a miracle.

So will GST – the mother of all taxes – help India, a US$2 trillion economy, one of Asia’s biggest, become a truly single market?

India’s 29 states and seven federally administered union territories had a different tax policy before the GST was rolled out. Theoretically speaking, all of these states and territories were covered by a common taxation system. However, bringing them all under a single tax umbrella – a change the Modi government describes as “transformational” – is far from easy.

There are problems aplenty with the taxation system. The prime one being more politicians, than tax experts, are the masterminds behind the mammoth project. Even before the taxes were unveiled the government was forced to abandon its original plan and agree to exclude high revenue tax products from the GST basket – crude oil, natural gas, aviation fuel, diesel and petrol – for the initial years, as the states were unwilling to give up their taxation powers.

After waxing eloquent of “the states and Centre pooling their powers and sovereignty”, the then finance minister, Arun Jaitley, spoke about the long-term benefits – a stark reminder of the times when high-value bank notes were scrapped in November 2016 and the government told citizens to focus on the future benefits.

Around 160 countries in the world have some form of GST or value added tax. However, unlike other countries where GST translates as one country, one tax, India has six slabs to tax goods and services ranging from zero to 28 per cent, with most commodities falling between 12 and 18 per cent. Luxurious products such as cosmetics are taxed the highest – at 28 per cent.

While GST replaced the heady concoction of national and local levies and duties, initially businesses had to file returns three times a month and 37 times annually. Reason enough to give businessmen a headache. And reason enough to make tax consultants and tax lawyers smile – perhaps the only ones smiling in these taxing times.



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


Lamat R Hasan
About the Author: Lamat is an Associate Editor at Asia News Network.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Analysis, Economics

North Korea beefs up self-defense capabilities in military reorganization

The North have been making many changes ahead of talks. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un presided over a meeting of the top military decision-making body to accelerate the development of self-defense capabilities ahead of key events that will decide its national strategy, its state media reported Sunday. Discussions on ways to bolster its military capabilities through organizational restructuring and personnel reshuffle were highlighted during the third expanded meeting of the seventh central military commission of the ruling Workers’ Party. Details on what measures were discussed were not disclosed. “At the meeting, Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un


By Zaffar Abbas
December 23, 2019

Analysis, Economics

China-US trade deal bullish news for both countries, rest of world

From Chinese state media. State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Saturday that the China-US deal on the text of a phase-one economic and trade agreement serves as bullish news for both countries and the rest of the world. Speaking at a joint press conference with Slovenian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Miro Cerar, Wang said China has, as always, been opposed to settling economic and trade disputes by imposing tariffs as there is no winner in a trade war. China has also rejected the use of unilateral pressure as it violates the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO), said Wang. He pointed out that following rounds of back-and-forth negotiations, China and the United States have agreed on the wording of a phase-one economic and trade agreement, and the US side has promised to phase out additional tariffs on Chinese products. The agreement demonstrates the spirit


By Esther Ng
December 16, 2019

Analysis, Economics

China, US in constant touch to resolve trade issues

China and the United States are in constant touch to resolve pending trade and economic issues, the Ministry of Commerce said on Thursday. The comment came ahead of Sunday’s US deadline for another scheduled round of tariff increases on Chinese imports worth almost $160 billion. If a trade deal is not struck by Sunday, computer monitors and toys will be among the Chinese export items likely to be affected. Gao Feng, a ministry spokesman, said the Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council has already worked out tariff exemptions on some soybean, pork and other products shipped from the US — the latest sign of tensions easing in the protracted trade conflict. The US seems to resort to brinkmanship by using a tariff deadline to pressure China in the ongoing trade talks for a phase one, preliminary deal, said Chen Wenling, chief economist at the China Center for International Economic Exchanges


By Esther Ng
December 13, 2019

Analysis, Economics

India, China step up the wooing but Rajapaksa in no hurry to align Sri Lanka

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa will try to balance the competing interests of China, India in the region. The conversation in regional capitals after the emphatic win of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa in the Sri Lankan elections last month centres around a central question: Will he manage to pull a Sheikh Hasina on India and China? The reference, of course, is to the Bangladesh Prime Minister who many believe has managed to successfully push her country’s interests by balancing the competing strategic ambitions of China and India in South Asia. And Rajapaksa knows a thing or two about protecting what he believes are his country’s core interests. After all, he braved the Western world’s intense criticism – and India’s acute discomfort given its large domestic Tamil population – of the means adopted by him as Defence Minister in his brother and former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s


By Ishan Joshi
December 12, 2019

Analysis, Economics

Nepal moves up in Human Development Index but still lags behind in South Asia

Nepal’s human development index of 0,579 indicates that people are living longer, are more educated and have greater incomes, according to the Human Development Report. Despite global progress in tackling poverty, hunger and disease, a ‘new generation of inequalities’ indicates that many societies are not working as they should and Nepal is not an exception, according to a new human development report released on Tuesday. The old inequalities were based on access to health services and education whereas the new generation of inequalities is based on technology, education and the climate, according to the United Nations Development Programme’s Human Development Report. “Previously, we talked about wealth as a major driver for inequality. Now, countries like Nepal are in another inequality trap and that concerns


By The Kathmandu Post
December 12, 2019

Analysis, Economics

Report: US officials lied about Afghanistan

Civilian, military officials misled public for nearly two decades about status of war, Washington Post review of documents finds. For nearly two decades, senior US civilian and military officials didn’t tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan, The Washington Post reported on Monday after reviewing more than 2,000 pages of government documents. The officials made pronouncements they knew to be false and hid evidence that the war had become unwinnable, the newspaper said interviews with those officials show. John Sopko, the head of the federal agency that conducted the interviews, acknowledged to the Post that the documents show “the American people have constantly been lied to”. The newspaper said that two major claims in the documents are that US officials manipulated statistics to suggest to the American public that the war was being won and that successive


By Esther Ng
December 11, 2019