See More on Facebook

Analysis, Economics

India’s tryst with the goods and services tax

At the stroke of midnight on June 30, 2017, Prime Minister Narendra Modi rolled out India’s biggest and most complex tax reform – a look back on its pluses and minuses.

Written by

Updated: July 3, 2018

India rolled out its biggest tax reform since 1947 – the year it got rid of the British Raj – a year ago on July 1, 2017.

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) had been a long time coming – 13 years to be precise – and was touted as the most significant economic reform unleashed by Narendra Modi after taking over as Prime Minister in 2014.

GST, in its simplest avatar, is a one-tax system for a large country with a population of more than 1 billion. It aims to tidy up the tedious taxation system – with its many layers of comprehensible and incomprehensible cesses and surcharges. However, as most Indians have learned the hard way over the year, GST is not quite the simplistic one-tax system as it was made out to be, but a rather complex tax reform.

A look back at a year of the biggest tax reform and the minuses seem to outweigh the plusses. Two of the biggest takeaways from the new GST regime – the number of registered tax payers has risen phenomenally and tax collections have shot up.

This apart from the obvious benefits such as the elimination of multiple taxes, decreasing prices which have helped the poor and middle classes, increasing transparency and therefore reduction of corruption, and, according to some observers, increased productivity.

However, the failures have been far more – mostly as the reforms were overwhelming and the IT system – the goods and services tax network (GSTN) portal – was ill-equipped to support the process.

A year later, almost everyone is in agreement that India cannot have a single rate GST. The six GST slabs – 0%, 3%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% – have compounded the woes of taxpayers. Refunds are delayed and a return filing system is not in place yet.

Within a year too many changes have been introduced – some for the benefit of taxpayers – yet all this has added to the confusion. According to a report, there have been more than 400 notifications, 100 circulars and FAQs issued so far. Products and services have been moved from one tax bucket to another, the list under 28% tax bracket has been drastically cut, the refund filing mechanism, the due dates and forms have been changed several times.

And there is talk of more changes in the future.

The Background

When the GST was endorsed by Parliament in 2016, it was hailed as a great move to make India a truly single market. However, two years on, businessmen are still nervous, and the government in an overdrive to defend and fix apparent loopholes.

Prime Minister Modi has had to deal with bad press all along. Reams have been written zeroing in on the flaws of GST with many claiming the smooth implementation of the new tax regime can only be a miracle.

So will GST – the mother of all taxes – help India, a US$2 trillion economy, one of Asia’s biggest, become a truly single market?

India’s 29 states and seven federally administered union territories had a different tax policy before the GST was rolled out. Theoretically speaking, all of these states and territories were covered by a common taxation system. However, bringing them all under a single tax umbrella – a change the Modi government describes as “transformational” – is far from easy.

There are problems aplenty with the taxation system. The prime one being more politicians, than tax experts, are the masterminds behind the mammoth project. Even before the taxes were unveiled the government was forced to abandon its original plan and agree to exclude high revenue tax products from the GST basket – crude oil, natural gas, aviation fuel, diesel and petrol – for the initial years, as the states were unwilling to give up their taxation powers.

After waxing eloquent of “the states and Centre pooling their powers and sovereignty”, the then finance minister, Arun Jaitley, spoke about the long-term benefits – a stark reminder of the times when high-value bank notes were scrapped in November 2016 and the government told citizens to focus on the future benefits.

Around 160 countries in the world have some form of GST or value added tax. However, unlike other countries where GST translates as one country, one tax, India has six slabs to tax goods and services ranging from zero to 28 per cent, with most commodities falling between 12 and 18 per cent. Luxurious products such as cosmetics are taxed the highest – at 28 per cent.

While GST replaced the heady concoction of national and local levies and duties, initially businesses had to file returns three times a month and 37 times annually. Reason enough to give businessmen a headache. And reason enough to make tax consultants and tax lawyers smile – perhaps the only ones smiling in these taxing times.

Enjoyed this story? Share it.

Lamat R Hasan
About the Author: Lamat is an Associate Editor at Asia News Network.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia

Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.

By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Analysis, Economics

Iran sanctions alarm Korean petrochemical sector

Korea, major player in crude oil market, seeking alternative countries would drive up costs. As the US is set to end sanction exemptions for countries buying oil from Iran, South Korean petrochemical companies are anticipated to struggle in having to reduce their Iranian oil supplies. From May 2, eight nations, including Korea, Japan, China and India, will be banned from buying oil from Iran as the US government’s 180-day waiver ends. Iran is the fifth-largest exporter of crude oil to Korea, following Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the US and Iraq. Imports of crude oil from Iran to Korea accounted for 8.6 percent of total imported crude oil in February, according to Korea National Oil Corp. “We were a bit shocked. We didn’t expect a complete ban. Every company (affected) will be busy securing condensate, which is not abundant in the market,” said an anonymous official of a local firm in the petroc

By The Korea Herald
April 24, 2019

Analysis, Economics

IMF to visit Pakistan in April

IMF says its mission will visit Pakistan ‘before end of April to continue constructive discussions’. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Monday said that it held “constructive discussions” with Pakistani authorities during last week’s spring meetings in Washington and that its mission will be visiting Pakistan “before the end of April to continue the discussions” on a bailout package. The announcement was made by the Office of the Resident Representative of the IMF in a press release following reports that the IMF mission’s visit of Pakistan for finalising the package may be delayed as both sides are still engaged in an intense discussion. “The Pakistani authorities and IMF staff held constructi

By Dawn
April 16, 2019

Analysis, Economics

Malaysia avoids termination fee by renegotiating rail deal

The Chinese-Malaysian venture will go ahead. The government decided to go back to the negotiation table on the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) project because its termination would cost RM21.78bil with “nothing to show for it”, says Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad. Dr Mahathir said in renegotiating the project, the government called for a more equitable deal, where the needs of Malaysians would be prioritised. He explained that the Pakatan Harapan government’s main objection to the ECRL project was based on the way and speed at which the original contract was negotiated and signed in 2016. “It was unjustified, a hefty lump sum price which lacked clarity in terms of technical specifications, price, and, by extension, economic justification.

By The Star
April 16, 2019

Analysis, Economics

A FAQ on Indian Elections

Asia News Network’s Ishan Joshi takes a look at some of the most frequently asked questions about the Indian election. Termed the “biggest democratic exercise’ in the world, India’s mega election spans over a number of days and involves a significant percentage of the world’s population. Asia News Network Associate Editor Ishan Joshi takes a look at some of the most pressing questions as the elections continue in India.  Why do the Indian elections take so long? Primarily, because of the logistics involved in conducting elections in this continent-sized country. India has close to 900 million eligible voters spread across 29 states and 7 union territories. Some of these areas are battling armed Islamist/Maoist insurgencies, others are considered sensitive due to issues of social unrest/law and order, and all of them are robus

By Asia News Network
April 16, 2019

Analysis, Economics

China and Central European countries agree to boost ties

China and the Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) on Friday agreed to enhance connectivity to achieve more development. The agreement was part of the Dubrovnik Guidelines for Cooperation between China and the CEECs, which was released after the eighth China-CEEC leaders’ meeting in the Croatian city of Dubrovnik. According to the guidelines, China and the CEECs are willing to promote railway projects cooperation in line with respective laws and regulations and through consultations, in particular by strengthening exchanges and cooperation on railway planning, railway organization development, management, technology development, logistics and freight terminal construction. China and the CEECs will jointly explore utilization and construction of logistics hubs, said the guidelines, adding that China is welcome to participate in joint development of new freight lines in connecting markets

By China Daily
April 15, 2019

Analysis, Economics

Seoul calls on Washington for auto tariff exclusion

Finance minister meets with US counterpart over trade, FX agendas. South Korea’s Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Hong Nam-ki has asked the US government for an exemption from a new tariff on imported vehicles, the Ministry of Economy and Finance said Sunday. He also met with representatives of major credit ratings agencies, to persuade them to reflect the peninsula’s eased geopolitical risk in their upcoming sovereign rating adjustments. The fiscal chief met US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Saturday, on the sidelines of the Group of 20 finance ministers and central bank governors meeting in Washington last week. This was the first face-to-face encounter between the two since Hong took office in December. “I sat with Secretary Mnuchin in a 30-minute, close-door meeting without any attendees,” Hong told reporters.

By The Korea Herald
April 15, 2019