See More on Facebook

Analysis, News

Will India sign pact with US for secure military communications?

After being postponed twice this year, the inaugural ‘2+2’ meeting also marks the 10th anniversary of the landmark India-US civil nuclear deal.


Written by

Updated: September 4, 2018

India and the United States are set for a significant bilateral meeting on September 6, when US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of Defence Jim Mattis will hold the first ‘Two plus Two (2+2)’ dialogue with India’s Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj and Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman.

The 2+2 dialogue is aimed at building a high level of trust between the two countries and will be the first of an annual series of dialogues on security issues to be held alternately in each country.

US President Donald Trump’s National Security Strategy of December 2017 called India a “major defence partner of the US”, and in light of last week’s cancellation of the US$300 million in payments to Pakistan for its failure to act against terrorists, the meet has assumed greater significance.

The inaugural 2+2 meeting, already postponed twice this year, also marks the 10th anniversary of the landmark India-US civil nuclear deal.

On the table will be Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA) – a legal framework for transfer of communication security equipment from the US to India. Observers say there is likely to be an in-principle agreement on COMCASA between the two sides at the dialogue, but its signing is unlikely.

COMCASA aims to facilitate exchange of secure communications between the two militaries and allow the sale of encrypted communication systems to India, which has been met with concerns on the Indian side. A US military negotiating team was in New Delhi last month to respond to Indian objections. The US has signed similar agreements with other countries called the Communication and Information Security Memorandum of Agreement (CISMOA).

The US – India’s second-largest supplier of defence hardware – designated it as a Major Defence Partner (MDP) and is keen on COMCASA for India to gain access to cutting edge technology. The militaries of India and the US exercise more with each other than they do with any other nation. And, this year, they will hold their first joint services amphibious exercise, to be followed by a joint services counter-terrorism exercise next year, media reports said.

COMCASA is part of of three military agreements that the US considers foundational for a functional military relationship. In August 2016, India signed the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA), which allows the military of each country to replenish warships from the other’s bases. Negotiations on the third agreement, Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement for Geo-spatial Cooperation (BECA), have not yet begun, media reports said.

However, defence experts are wary of the draconian Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which imposes sanctions on New Delhi’s two strategic partners – Russia, India’s largest arms supplier, and Iran, one of its three largest energy suppliers. Indian military officials have said they intend to raise the possible impact of CAATSA on a planned US$5-billion deal to acquire S-400 air defence systems from Russia.

Though President Trump recently signed a law that allows for case-by-case waivers under CAATSA, recent remarks by American officials have created doubts as to whether the US will provide a waiver for the S-400 deal.

Other issues on the table will be the US tightening regulations for granting H-1B work visas, which has affected Indians in a big way. For its part, India has put on hold the imposition of tariffs on US imports of steel and aluminium in view of the dialogue.

Washington sees India as a regional counter to China’s growing influence. India is also a key member of the ‘Quadrilateral’ – an informal grouping of democracies comprising the US, Japan, Australia and India.

India’s moves will be measured and will have to tread lightly in the meetings when it comes to many of its neighbors. India does not want to provoke China, even though it is opposed to Beijing’s sprawling Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). It will also want to go easy on Iran, with which it has co-developed the strategic Chabahar port that gives it access to Afghanistan and Central Asia, while bypassing Pakistan. India will have to be similarly careful about topics related to Russia, from which it plans to buy the S-400 air defence system.



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


Lamat R Hasan
About the Author: Lamat is an Associate Editor at Asia News Network.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Analysis, News

India’s cyber legislation is part of a worrying trend

International technology firms face sweeping new regulations in India that have the potential to create major shifts in the country’s cyber landscape. The new pieces of legislation were proposed as 2018 came to a close and require technology companies like Facebook and Google to store user data locally, and would also require these companies to police content and remove material the government of India deems unlawful.  Such content would include messages that threaten the “sovereignty and integrity of India.” The rules requires these companies to take action on such messages within a 24 hour period. Such regulations that require companies to monitor content isn’t unique to India. Vietnam has recently passed similar laws, with similar potential consequences. New rules also mandate that companies reveal the origin of particular messages when that information is requested. If that section of t


By Quinn Libson
January 17, 2019

Analysis, News

What does Vietnam’s new cyber law mean for online dissent?

Will Facebook kowtow to the Vietnamese government to keep its market share. Facebook is in violation of a Vietnamese new cybersecurity law by allowing its users to post content critical of the communist government on its platform, the Ministry of Information and Communication announced on Wednesday of last week. The news came just days after the law went into effect on Jan. 1. The new legislation requires internet companies to comply with government demands to remove user-posted material it doesn’t like. The law also stipulates that information technology companies—Facebook and Google for instance—may be required to set up local offices and store customer data domestically, a feature which human rights advocates worry might make it easier for the government to track and charge dissidents for their online activities. This new legislation follows a pattern of increasing digital scrutiny by th


By Quinn Libson
January 15, 2019

Analysis, News

2019 is a year for major Chinese anniversaries

President Xi Jinping delivered a major speech on Wednesday on Taiwan, one of the hottest button issues for the country. The speech took place to acknowledge the 40th anniversary of a the “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan,” a crucial policy statement issued on Jan. 1, 1979 by the National People’s Congress that helped lead to a rapprochement between Mainland China and Taiwan. Xi’s speech sent a stern warning to those that advocate for Taiwan’s independence, including Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen, who is up for re-election in January 2020, and her supporters. “It is a historical and legal fact, that Taiwan is part of China and the two sides across Taiwan Straits belong to one and the same China, can never be altered


By Quinn Libson
January 8, 2019

Analysis, News

Seat belt warning as storm clouds loom in 2019

A look at potential headlines in 2019 by the Straits Times’ Warren Fernandez. You have been here before. As you settle into your comfortable seat for the long flight ahead, a voice crackles from the cockpit. “Our flying time today will be 12 hours, 40 minutes, and we expect a smooth journey ahead, but there looks to be some pockets of turbulence along the way,” your captain says, sounding vaguely assuring. “We suggest you keep your seat-belt on.” So was said on my recent Singapore Airlines flight home from holidaying abroad. It prompted several hours of meandering musings from 30,000 feet in the air about what lies ahead in the New Year. Some of the storm clouds that appear to loom on the political horizon include: 1. US-China: rivalries among frenemies Three recent developments sum up the precarious state of relations between the world’s two main powers, now on a tentative


By The Straits Times
January 7, 2019

Analysis, News

Preview: A year of elections for Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia will have a busy political calendar in 2019 with voters in Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines heading to the polls within the year. Thailand In December, Thailand lifted its ban on political activity that has been in place for the past four years as the kingdom prepares for a general election on Feb 24—the country’s first in eight years. The last election the country attempted, in 2014, was sabotaged by anti-government protesters acted to prevent the Pheu Thai Party and its head Yingluck Shinawatra from returning to power. Pheu Thai went on to be ousted by a coup led by then-army chief General Prayut Chan-o-cha and has spent the last five years under military rule. Since then, the military junta has rewritten the Thai Constitution in a wa


By Quinn Libson
January 7, 2019

Analysis, News

Afghan war helped Pakistan keep nuclear option: US papers

US backing for anti-Soviet fighters in Afghanistan may have enabled the Pakistan bomb. Torn between preventing Pakistan from going nuclear and fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan, the United States appears to have decided that pushing the Russians out of Kabul was more important, shows a set of documents released by the US State Department. Official US memos and letter — released under an arrangement to make public official documents after 30 years — show that Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (in office from 1978 to 1989) also played a key role in convincing Washington to continue to support Islamabad despite its nuclear programme. Timeline: History of US-Pakistan relations A confidential State Department report, dated Aug 20, 1984, shows that by 1984 Washington knew Islamabad had acquired the


By Dawn
December 24, 2018