See More on Facebook

Diplomacy

Is there a new cold war between US and China

US Vice-President Mike Pence delivered a speech on Thursday in which he criticized China on multiple fronts but does it signal a new cold war.


Written by

Updated: October 9, 2018

In the speech, Pence accused China of meddling in the US’ midterm elections in a bid to undermine the Donald Trump administration. Some have claimed his speech indicates the start of a new “Cold War”. What does the speech mean for bilateral ties? Three experts share their views with China Daily:

Pence speech exposes White House’s anxiety

In general, Pence’s speech manifested that the United States indeed cares a lot about China, so much so that it has incited many grudges. Also the speech disclosed a sense of helplessness, to which the lack of new measures towards China has attested. Previously the US has been busy criticizing and meddling in China’s domestic practices, but now it has shifted to accusing China of interfering with its domestic affairs, which signifies a turn of the tide in its China policies and the bilateral relationship.

Overall, Pence has lashed out at China for three reasons: First, he aims to build momentum for the midterm elections as the election is tight right now and both parties have no obvious advantages. The Republican Party has targeted China in the hope of winning over voters and retaining control of the House of Representatives.

Second, the Trump administration, which the right wing rhetorician Republican represented, is unduly anxious about China. The trade brawl it instigated with China six months ago has yielded modest effects, to the administration’s anxiety and frustration. Pence’s speech merely displayed this anxiety.

Third, Pence may intend to show his allegiance to President Donald Trump by this fierce speech against China. A recent article in The New York Times cited an anonymous high-ranking official, who claimed to be part of the resistance against Trump in the administration, and many have speculated that the unnamed official was actually Pence, thus the vice-president may felt compelled to demonstrate his loyalty to the president.

Given the similar style of Pence’s speech and Churchill’s Iron Curtain Speech in 1946, which opened the curtain on the Cold War, some claimed it marks the beginning of a new Cold War. Yet history does not simply repeat itself, a speech alone, no matter how vehement cannot instigate an all-out confrontation and spark a war. At the moment, there is no consensus on China within US society, neither have its allies offered the US the support it hoped for in confronting China. In addition, with close economic ties with the US and an extremely attractive market, China does not resemble the Soviet Union in any sense. Also, needless to say, China has no desire to be party to a “Cold War”.

Pence’s speech highlights that the Trump administration thinks much of China and views it as the US’ primary rival. China should attach importance to this change of dynamics in bilateral relations and make preparations, but it should remain reasonable and stay calm, avoiding overreaction as it has no need to panic and be afraid.

China should adjust its macroeconomic policy, stimulate domestic demand to expand consumption on one hand, and expedite the reform and opening-up to improve enterprises’ efficiency and revitalize the economy on the other.

Jin Canrong, a professor at and the associate dean of the School of International Studies, Renmin University of China

Election politics worsen Sino-US trade dispute

Revealing that the Trump administration has taken China to be the US’ top competitor, Mike Pence’s speech can be seen as a watershed in the ongoing China-US trade dispute and President Trump’s China policies. Aiming to push forward the US’ stance in the trade frictions and coerce China to make substantial concessions on multiple fronts including trade and intellectual property protection, Pence has called upon US society and the international community to confront China. Which lays bare the Trump administration’s desire to stall China’s rise. Besides, making China a campaign foe provides the Republican Party a foothold in not only the upcoming midterm elections but also the presidential election in two years.

The speech reveals the clearer positioning of China in the Trump administration’s global strategy. Yet interpreting this as presaging a new “Cold War” is going too far.

Regarding the speech itself, the following points needs our particular attention. First of all, Pence vehemently attacked China’s practices in human rights and religious freedom, deviating from the Trump administration’s previous modus operandi of not making the human rights issue a major concern in the bilateral relationship. Furthermore, Pence directed the attack against the Chinese government and portrayed it as an evil empire which completely disregards international rules.

Facing the biggest crisis in international relationships in 40 years, what China needs to do is refuting the criticism while better integrating itself with the world. Time will tell what kind of country China really is. Most important, China should not treat this lightly as what happens as a result of the administration’s designs will influence the bilateral relationship for the next 10 to 20 years. The key is to take initiative as much as possible and respond with more swiftness and preciseness when necessary.

Zhu Feng, dean of the Institute of International Relations of Nanjing University

Two sides still far from all-out confrontation

As a matter of fact, it is nothing new for the two US political parties to bash China during elections. Certainly Pence has vented the administration’s discontent with China with an eye on the midterm elections, which are sure to exert much influence on the status of the Republican Party and thus the presidential election in 2020.

So it would be farfetched to say at the moment that the US is launching an all-out confrontation, even a new “Cold War” with China. It remains to be seen whether the Trump administration can and will mobilize the US’ military strength to confront China. Nevertheless, a consensus has been emerged in the US to take a more aggressive and tough approach towards China. And Pence’s speech, which was laden with laments, has sent a negative signal, to say the least.

The inking of agreements with Canada and Mexico, together with the ongoing talks with the European Union, have enabled the administration to concentrate its concerns on China in a bid to contain the latter’s growing influence.

Later on the US may introduce some radical policies on trade, the South China Sea and the Tibet issue.

But in assuming that it can coerce China into concessions with its extreme pressure strategy, the Trump administration is making a serious mistake. It should change its strategy in its dealings with a major country like China.

Instead of firing at China and making bilateral ties a scapegoat, the US should reflect on its domestic ills with more courage and wisdom, and the Trump administration should recalibrate China-US relations as the changing dynamics it is creating in bilateral ties will have far-reaching influences on global stability and development.

All in all, it is essential of China and the US to repair relations and avoid conflict at all costs.

Fu Mengzi, vice-president of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


China Daily
About the Author: China Daily covers domestic and world news through nine print editions and digital media worldwide.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Diplomacy

Rohingya repatriation fails

None of the refugees wished to return to Myanmar. The failure of the second attempt to begin repatriating the Rohingyas has once again exposed Myanmar’s lack of sincerity, experts said. Rohingyas say Myanmar has not taken into consideration any of their core demands — guarantee of citizenship, recognition as an ethnic community, ensuring safety in Rakhine and other basic rights that they have been denied since 1982. Until these conditions are met, the Rohingyas will not be willing to go back. The issues were raised time and again by rights groups, but nothing has been done. “Myanmar is not serious at all. They are playing diplomacy and Bangladesh has fallen into its trap,” Prof Imtiaz Ahmed of International Relations at Dhaka University told The Daily Star yesterday. The most crucial thing Myanmar needs to do before repatriation is amend its 1982 law, which stripped the Rohingy


By Daily Star
August 23, 2019

Diplomacy

South Korea pulls out of intel-sharing pact amid spat with Japan

Seoul cites ‘grave change’ in security cooperation conditions attributable to Japan’s export restrictions for abolishing GSOMIA. South Korea decided to withdraw from the bilateral military intelligence-sharing pact with Japan on Thursday, amid escalating friction over trade and historical issues. In a televised announcement, Cheong Wa Dae said it has made the decision to abolish General Security of Military Information Agreement and will notify Japan via diplomatic channels by midnight on Saturday, the deadline for a decision on whether to renew the agreement. “The government deemed that Japan caused grave change in the bilate


By The Korea Herald
August 23, 2019

Diplomacy

France presses India to opt for dialogue on occupied Kashmir issue

Macron and Modi met before the G7 summit. French President Emmanuel Macron has met with India’s prime minister, discussing climate and other concerns ahead of the G-7 summit but also pressing for dialogue with Pakistan over the crisis in occupied Kashmir. The meeting on Thursday with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was part of a marathon day of diplomacy for Macron, who is touching base with key countries before the weekend summit in Biarritz. Modi will be a special guest there. Read more: US urges India to free detainees, restore rights in occupied Kashmir Macron met earlier on Thursday with new British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Greece’s prime minister. Macron said he stressed the need for India and Pakistan to resolve differences bilaterally and avoid an escalation. On Aug 5, Modi dow


By Dawn
August 23, 2019

Diplomacy

China says Canada solely responsible for difficulties in relations

The heiress to the Huawei fortune has been arrested in Canada, while China has arrested several Canadians. China-Canada relations have met serious difficulties, and the Canadian side is solely responsible for this, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said Thursday. Geng Shuang made the comment at a press briefing when asked about Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s remarks that the Canadian government would not “back down” in disputes with China. Urging the Canadian side to reflect upon its mistakes, Geng said Canada should treat China’s solemn position and concerns seriously and immediately release Meng Wanzhou, the chief financial officer of Huawei. Geng also criticized Canada’s series of wrong comments on Hong Kong, saying that Hong Kong affairs are China’s internal affairs and brook no interference from any country, organization or individual.


By China Daily
August 23, 2019

Diplomacy

EDITORIAL: Trump’s efforts needed in Kashmir mediation

The nuclear powers are act loggerheads and the threat of violence is very real. US PRESIDENT Donald Trump’s advice that Pakistan and India must “work towards reducing tensions” in the wake of the abrupt cancellation of the special status and autonomy of India-held Kashmir shows just how grave the situation is between the two nuclear-armed states. For historically, the Americans have only woken up and rushed to the region when the two neighbours have been on the brink. And this is exactly where, Pakistan insists, the problem lies. “A tough situation, but good conversations”, is how Mr Trump described the current state of affairs in this region through his tweet on Monday, after speaking by phone to the leaders of the two countries in the space of a few days. Many on this side of the border


By Dawn
August 22, 2019

Diplomacy

Japan believes N. Korea has already developed nuclear warheads

All of Japan is within range of Pyongyang’s ballistic missiles. According to the original version of the Japanese government’s 2019 white paper on defense, North Korea is believed to have already achieved the miniaturization of nuclear weapons and the development of nuclear warheads, The Yomiuri Shimbun has learned. This is the first time such statements have been included in the report. Regarding South Korea, which is intensifying its confrontation with Japan, the report lowered that nation’s ranking from the previous year among the countries and regions that are promoting security cooperation with Japan. The Japanese government is making arrangements to approve the 2019 white paper at a Cabinet meeting in mid-September. On North Korea’s military moves, the paper again said they posed a “serious and imminent threat.” The 2018 version of the report said there was a “possi


By The Japan News
August 22, 2019