See More on Facebook

Diplomacy

South Korea court ruling will affect relations with Japan

A ruling by South Korea’s supreme court allowing forced labourers during World War II to seek compensation with a Japanese firm could have lasting repercussions.


Written by

Updated: November 1, 2018

South Korea’s top court ruled on Tuesday that labourers forced into service during the second world war by the Japanese could seek compensation. The court ordered  Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation to pay  100 million won ($87,700) to the four plaintiffs in the case.

The court disregarded a 1965 treaty normalizing relations between the two countries which Tokyo said nullifies the plaintiffs’ claims.

Protest 

The decision was met with criticism from the Japanese government with Foreign Minister Taro Kono asking the South Korean government to remain committed to previous agreements, according to the Yomiuri Shimbun.

In telephone talks with his South Korean counterpart Kang Kyung Wha, Kono pressed the South Korean government to ensure that Japanese nationals and corporations suffer no ill effects from the court’s ruling.

During the talks, Kono reiterated Japan’s position that the issue of compensating former requisitioned workers was “completely and ultimately resolved” under the 1965 agreement on the settlement of problems concerning property and claims and on economic cooperation. He also said Tokyo “viewed the matter as extremely grave because the legal foundation of the two countries has been fundamentally damaged.” Kang responded by saying the Korean government was discussing how to deal with the matter.

Seoul is expected to decide its position after consulting relevant ministries and experts on the issue.

Japan eyes legal action

“We’ll do whatever we can. We’ll show our intention to protect Japanese companies,” a high-ranking Japanese government official said Tuesday after the ruling, according to the Yomiuri Shimbun.

In response to Tuesday’s ruling, the Japanese Foreign Ministry set up an office in its Asian and Oceanian Affairs Bureau to deal with bilateral property and claim issues, and began full-scale preparations for a legal response.

Meanwhile, South Korea’s Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesman Noh Kyu Duk said Tuesday at a press conference: “We, as a government, are considering various possibilities. We must put our heads together to keep the latest judgment from negatively affecting Japan-South Korea relations.”

No great ideas

According to South Korean government sources, Seoul has approached Tokyo in the past through back channels to form a foundation funded by both governments, South Korean firms and defendant Japanese companies to handle compensation payments. This suggestion was rejected by the Japanese government.

If bilateral talks break down, the Japanese government will suggest, based on the agreement, the formation of an arbitration commission including an arbitrator from a third nation.

There is no precedent for forming such a commission. The two countries might not be able to agree on the selection of the third-party arbitrator. If this happened, the Japanese side might file a complaint with the International Court of Justice (ICJ), but even then a trial is likely not to be convened, as South Korea has not accepted the obligation to attend ICJ trials.

One reason why the South Korean government tries to avoid settlement through an arbitration commission or the ICJ is that “losing will spur public finger-pointing, causing tremendous harm to the Moon administration,” a Japan-South Korea diplomatic source said.

Even if an ICJ trial would not be held, the Japanese government is still considering filing a complaint, to show international society that South Korea breached international law.

The Moon administration has taken an ambiguous approach, trying to balance domestic public opinion and the Japan-South Korea relationship. It acted in a similar way regarding a bilateral agreement signed at the end of 2015 over the issue of former comfort women, where the administration did not abolish nor renegotiate the deal but still has not accepted it.

Fourteen similar cases regarding former requisitioned workers are currently pending in South Korea, and the latest court ruling may trigger a flood of orders for Japanese firms to pay compensation. Tokyo plans to urge Seoul to take measures to prevent the latest case from becoming a judicial precedent.

 



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


Cod Satrusayang
About the Author: Cod Satrusayang is the Managing Editor at Asia News Network.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Diplomacy

Japan, Russia to not discuss sensitive territorial issue at G20

Japan, Russia likely to skip agreement on travel to northern territories at G20. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Russian President Vladimir Putin are unlikely to agree on a framework to facilitate travel to the northern territories at their bilateral meeting to be held as early as Saturday on the sidelines of the Group of 20 summit, according to Japanese government sources. Since April, the two governments have been studying a system to grant people traveling between the two countries and the northern territories special passport and visa treatment. The system would enable joint economic activities without harming the legal positions of Japan and Russia, which both claim sovereignty over the four islands. Japan had been considering a Russian proposal to allow short-term visa exemptions for travel between Hokkaido and Sakhalin in the Russian Far East, with the aim of reaching an


By The Japan News
June 26, 2019

Diplomacy

Vietnam, EU to sign free trade agreement

The agreement will be signed in Hanoi on June 30. The European Council announced on Tuesday that it has approved the European Union – Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA) and the EU – Vietnam Investment Protection Agreement (EVIPA), and assigned the EU to sign the deals with Vietnam on June 30 in Hanoi The EVFTA and EVIPA are the most ambitious agreements concluded between the EU and a developing country. Once the EVFTA takes effect, over 99 per cent of tariff on goods from both sides will be lifted. Vietnam will remove 65 per cent of import tariff on goods from the EU. Remaining tariffs will be removed in the next decade. Besides offering significant economic opportunities, the trade agreement ensures that trade, investment and sustainable development go hand in hand, by setting the highest standards of labour, safety, environmental and consumer protection. Meanwhile, the EVITA will h


By Viet Nam News
June 26, 2019

Diplomacy

US should stop forcing nations to take sides

China state media says US should stop pursuing its polarising diplomacy programs. When then US president Barack Obama launched his Pivot to Asia strategy in 2012, trying to drive a wedge between China and its neighbors, the Southeast Asian nations’ response was loud and clear: They did not want to be forced to choose between China and the United States. The US has been a security ally for some ASEAN nations, while China has been their largest trade partner. So maintaining good relations with both makes perfect sense. European nations also resisted US pressure in 2015 by joining the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Luxembourg will host the AIIB’s first annual meeting outside Asia next month. After labeling China a revisionist power and a strategic competitor in its 2018 national security strategy, the US has intensified its efforts to curtail the rise of China. Instead of l


By China Daily
June 26, 2019

Diplomacy

Pakistan’s Iran conundrum

It’s hard to identify any country that benefits from relentless US efforts to tighten the screws on Iran. On November 21, 1979, Pakistani protesters stormed the United States embassy in Islamabad. They smashed windows and set fire to the building. By the time the Pakistani military had quelled the violence, the embassy had sustained extensive damage and several people — both Americans and Pakistanis — had died. The attack came at a tense moment for US-Pakistan relations. Several months earlier, Washington


By Dawn
June 26, 2019

Diplomacy

US, China must compromise to reach deal: Chinese official

Both sides must come together in good faith for any progress to be made. Both China and the United States must be willing to compromise if they are to reach a deal when presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump meet at the G-20 Summit this week, a Chinese trade official has said. Vice-Minister for Commerce Wang Shouwen said at a news briefing yesterday that trade teams from both sides are in talks. He did not elaborate, but stressed that China negotiates on the basis of mutual respect, equality and mutual benefit. “An agreement reached has to be beneficial for both sides, and meeting each other halfway means both sides must be willing to compromise – not just one side giving way,” said Mr Wang, who is part of China’s negotiating team.


By The Straits Times
June 26, 2019

Diplomacy

Pakistan to get $3bn in deposits, direct investments from Qatar

Pakistan has recently received loans from the World Bank and investments from the Saudis. Qatar is making $3 billion dollars worth of new investments in Pakistan, in the form of deposits and direct investments, said Special Assistant to Prime Minister on Information and Broadcasting Dr Firdous Ashiq Awan on Monday. The economic partnership between Qatar and Pakistan will reach $9 billion, Qatar News Agency quoted foreign minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani as saying. “The Qatari-Pakistani economic partnership will amount to $9 billion. Qatar affirms


By Dawn
June 25, 2019