See More on Facebook

Economics

China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Debt trap or hope?

Asia News Network commentators weigh the pros and cons of working with China on its Belt and Road Initiative.


Written by

Updated: November 20, 2018

INDONESIA’S INTERESTS

Shah Suraj Bharat The Jakarta Post, Indonesia

Indonesia has been a reluctant participant in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) but as the country’s financial insecurity becomes increasingly apparent, we can expect to see greater interest in the BRI.

Indeed, financial insecurity is especially pertinent given the country’s recent economic woes. The rupiah is among the world’s worst-performing currencies, down almost 9 per cent this year despite the country’s good macroeconomic fundamentals.

What’s more, the struggle to diversify and source finance for President Joko Widodo’s US$355 billion (S$490 billion) infrastructure drive has left state-owned enterprises unsustainably bearing the brunt of its costs. Combined with the sharp decline of the rupiah, financial pressures meant the 2019 state budget saw a lowly 2.4 per cent increase in infrastructure spending.

This is where the BRI becomes of increasing interest. All is not rosy, however. This new source of finance is underpinned by Chinese economic statecraft, described by Brussels-based academic Ramon Pacheco Pardo as China’s use of economic inducements to gain influence in target countries. Countries such as Sri Lanka have been forced into debt-for-equity arrangements, with China taking over operations at the US$1.5 billion Hambantota Port, which it helped finance and build, after the government struggled to repay its debts.

Meanwhile, the new Malaysian government has halted US$22 billion worth of BRI projects and Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad accused China of securing influence via debt-funded infrastructure schemes that recipient countries could not afford.

Indonesia’s government often struggles to manage anti-Chinese sentiment. Yet, the fact remains that Indonesia needs to attract finance for its financial security and national interests.


TRAP OF THE CENTURY?

Govind Bhattacharjee The Statesman, India

IT BEGAN AS A FAINT MURMUR OF PROTEST, BUT THE MURMURS ARE NOW RISING TO A TUMULT.

Mr Jeff Smith of Heritage Foundation, a Washington-based think-tank, recounts these instances in a paper.

Beginning with Hambantota, China’s BRI has lost much of its sheen as country after country is seeing through the Chinese game plan of unequal treaties and ultimate debt-equity swap, recognising that ultimately it will benefit only China, not them.

In August, Myanmar scaled back the US$7.3 billion Chinese-backed Kyauk Pyu Deepwater port project to only US$1.3 billion “over concerns it is too expensive and could ultimately fall under Beijing’s control if Myanmar were to default on its debt”.

Thailand had rejected proposals in 2016 for Chinese infrastructure investments and refused to grant land rights for them. “Thailand is not Laos,” its minister had said then, referring to Laos, where China’s US$6.7 billion funding for the railway amounts to half the country’s gross domestic product.

Even China’s all-weather friend Pakistan had to cancel a Chinese proposal last year to finance and construct the multibillion-dollar Diamer-Bhasha Dam over the Indus in Gilgit-Baltistan as China’s financing conditions were perceived to be against Pakistan’s interests.

Three major road projects already stand cancelled and Pakistan has also rejected a demand that the Chinese currency, the yuan, be used in the Gwadar Free Trade Zone.

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the shining diadem of BRI, is estimated to cost US$62 billion. An estimated 80 per cent of this cost will be financed by China, but on its own terms.

Chinese enterprises will enjoy multiple tax and duty concessions, which are unavailable to Pakistani businessmen, Chinese nationals will enjoy visa-free access to Pakistan without reciprocity and Chinese aid will come either as costly loans or equity swap.

China has reportedly financed 80 per cent of Pakistan’s external debt and the external debt payments are estimated to soar by 65 per cent to US$12.7 billion.

Beginning with Hambantota, China’s BRI has lost much of its sheen as country after country is seeing through the Chinese game plan of unequal treaties and ultimate debt-equity swap, recognising that ultimately it will benefit only China, not them.

In August, Myanmar scaled back the US$7.3 billion Chinese-backed Kyauk Pyu Deepwater port project to only US$1.3 billion “over concerns it is too expensive and could ultimately fall under Beijing’s control if Myanmar were to default on its debt”.

In June, Vietnam witnessed public protests against the government’s proposal to grant special economic zones to foreign firms with leases of up to 99 years, which stirred fears that it would end up “giving China control over parts of Vietnamese territory”.

Last month, in Maldives, after the unlikely defeat of strongman Abdulla Yameen who had locked up his opponents in jail including the Supreme Court judges who had ruled against him, President-elect Ibrahim Mohamed Solih has pledged to review the commitments his predecessor had made to China for its BRI projects.

Even the United Nations raised a red flag about financial risks involved in BRI just after the Obor summit in May last year, with a UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific study highlighting disproportionate amounts of debt arising from the BRI projects in several countries owed to China compared to their GDPs.

The US$62 billion CPEC project in Pakistan is equivalent in worth to 20 per cent of its GDP, and two BRI agreements signed with Kazakhstan in 2013 and 2014 for US$52 billion are worth almost 40 per cent of Kazakhstan’s GDP.

India was a lone voice amid global adulation for the BRI, when it refused to participate in the BRI summit in China.

But since the middle of last year, the democratic Quad – Australia, India, Japan and the United States – and several European countries have begun to sign al reservations about the BRI.


BRI FOR ALL

Zhou Li China Daily, China

Since the founding of new China, especially since the introduction of reform and opening-up, Chinese leaders have solemnly declared that the country will never seek hegemony no matter how developed it becomes.

China has never asked other countries to follow or “copy” its development model. It is China’s belief that world peace and common development can be based only on mutual respect, cooperation, learning and trust.

So, it is actively building a global partnership network by expanding areas of common interest with other countries and promoting international relations.

Over the past five years, China has put forward the BRI for greater connectivity among countries, economies and regions, and launched fruitful cooperation with many countries.

It has participated actively in multilateral organisations, such as the UN, G-20, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and Brics, and handled various disputes through consultations.

However, the Donald Trump administration, with its “America First” fixation, has adopted an extremist policy in a bid to strengthen the US hegemony and is brushing aside the established rules of international cooperation and bypassing the UN and other international organisations.

This goes against the consensus among other countries that uphold multilateralism rather than unilateralism, free trade rather than protectionism, dialogue rather than sanctions, and mutual benefits.

The China-proposed BRI is an effort to unite and rally the international society to build a new type of international relations and promote the building of a community with a shared future for mankind.



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


Asia News Network
About the Author: Asia News Network is a regional media alliance comprising 24 media entities.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Economics

More changes friendly to foreign investors on way in China

China is courting more FDI as their cash reserves run lower. China will roll out more measures friendly to foreign investors, including further removing business restrictions and leveling the playing field for foreign businesses, to foster a more enabling business environment and attract overseas investment. The decision was made on Wednesday at a State Council executive meeting chaired by Premier Li Keqiang. Meeting participants decided to open up more areas. Restrictive measures outside the national and FTZ negative lists on foreign investors’ market access will be consolidated. Restrictions will be lifted on the business scope for those foreign-invested banks, securities companies and fund management firms that are already operating in China. Policies on foreign investment in the automobile industry will be refined, including giving equal treatment in market access to domestic and foreig


By China Daily
October 18, 2019

Economics

Malaysia’s PM Mahathir says rail line RTS linking Johor Baru to Singapore to proceed

The rail line has been on again and off again. Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad on Thursday (Oct 17) said Malaysia will proceed with the 4km Johor Baru to Singapore rail line. His comments about the Rapid Transit System (RTS) rail link followed that of Malaysian Transport Minister Anthony Loke on Tuesday that details of the project will be decided by the Malaysian Cabinet within two weeks. Tun Dr Mahathir said when asked by reporters on Thursday: “We will proceed with the RTS but we will take some time.” Asked if this meant the Malaysian government had resolved 


By The Straits Times
October 18, 2019

Economics

S. Korean, ASEAN officials look ahead to special summit and stronger regional ties

Korea has increasingly look to Southeast Asia as an export destination and regional partners. Ahead of the highly anticipated summit in Busan next month between the leaders of South Korea and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, top officials from participating countries gathered in the southern port city Wednesday and voiced high expectations for the future of the relationship between South Korea and the ASEAN nations. South Korean Ambassador to ASEAN Lim Sung-nam, ASEAN-Korea Center Secretary-General Lee Hyuk, Busan Mayor Oh Keo-don and Myanmar Ambassador to South Korea U Thant Sin said they looked forward to the upcoming summit, calling it a steppingstone to stronger South Korea-ASEAN ties and to economic prosperity and peace on the Korean Peninsula. “In the past 30 years, the relationship between South Korea and ASEAN has grown to an astonishing degree. Trade volume rose 20-fold and human e


By The Korea Herald
October 18, 2019

Economics

BOK slashes key rate to record-low 1.25%

The government hopes to stimulate a stagnating economy. South Korea’s central bank on Wednesday cut the country’s key interest rate to 1.25 percent, reflecting the sluggish economic growth, low inflation and declining exports. Its second rate cut in three months — to the lowest ever level — is in line with the global trend toward monetary easing. “We have cut the base rate considering the lower-than-expected growth outlook and low inflation,” said Bank of Korea Gov. Lee Ju-yeol in a press conference.The BOK’s rate-setting Monetary Policy Board decided to lower the base rate by 25 basis points from 1.5 percent that it had set three months ago. The move paralleled the US Fed Reserve’s decision last month to lower its key interest rate to the 1.75-2 percent range, down 25 basis points from the previous 2-2.25 percent range. The BOK board cited contractions in trade, sl


By The Korea Herald
October 17, 2019

Economics

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam unveils measures to ease housing crunch

Lam was forced to deliver speech via video after protests. Embattled Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam announced measures aimed at easing a housing shortage on Wednesday (Oct 16) as she battles to restore confidence in her administration and address widespread discontent after four months of mostly violent anti-government protests. Mrs Lam was forced to deliver her speech via video after her annual policy address in the Legislative Council was aborted when some lawmakers repeatedly jeered and shouted at her as she began speaking. After aborting her speech in the chamber tw


By The Straits Times
October 17, 2019

Economics

Thai labourers face uncertainty over cost of production

The trade war has not left Thailand unaffected. The slowdown in global economy has dampened growth of the support industries in Thailand in its role as a part-producer for foreign investors, with all finished items shipped out to target countries or the parent companies. When investing companies add value to their products and sold at higher prices, Thai producers receive less profits, resulting in low wages for labourers. Production of industrial parts could be easily relocated to other countires, said Chalee Loysong, president of the Confederation of Electronic, Electrical Appliances, Auto and Metal Workers (TEAM). A clear sign of the move emerged when companies started to reduce costs through cutting down on the numbers of both full-time workers and those engaged in outsourced work, he said, adding that the latter are especially prompt to being discarded, given the absen


By The Nation (Thailand)
October 16, 2019