See More on Facebook

Analysis

Nissan’s misdeeds highlight delay in corporate governance reform

Changes are long overdue at one of the world’s largest auto manufacturers.


Written by

Updated: December 12, 2018

With Nissan Motor Co. itself being charged on Monday with falsifying securities reports, the automaker’s slowness to implement corporate governance reforms has again come to the fore.

Though Nissan aims to accelerate drastic across-the-board managerial reforms, including the establishment of a “remuneration committee” comprising external directors to decide board members’ pay, the firm is expected to face an uphill battle.

Responding to the charges against Nissan, President and Chief Executive Officer Hiroto Saikawa told reporters Monday night, “We have taken action because we are determined to fulfill our responsibility as a corporation to disclose [executives’ remuneration].”

“We must take prompt measures to tackle the urgent task of [reforming management],” he said.

Several Nissan executives said that promotion, demotion and executive remuneration were entirely decided by former Nissan Chairman Carlos Ghosn.

“You risk your future if you rebel against Ghosn,” some employees have said of the mood that took hold at the company, causing deliberations at board of directors’ meetings to lose substance.

In 1999, Ghosn was sent from France’s Renault SA to financially troubled Nissan. He became the “savior of Nissan,” and consequently too much power was concentrated in him.

In recent years, Ghosn had decided board members’ compensation in consultation with Saikawa and then representative director Greg Kelly, an aide to Ghosn. However, in reality, Ghosn had the final say on compensation.

Nissan is said to lag behind other global companies in terms of establishing strong corporate governance.

The Corporate Governance Code, a set of guidelines for the conduct of listed companies drawn up in 2015, urges firms to separate “business execution” and “oversight of management.”

The guidelines also state that companies should appoint at least two independent external directors.

According to the Tokyo Stock Exchange, about 85 percent of 2,540 companies listed on the First and Second Sections on the TSE met the requirement as of July 2017, but Nissan had appointed only one independent director as of June.

The basic idea of the guidelines is that the board of directors has the responsibility to set the broad direction of corporate strategy and conduct more effective oversight, in order to ensure that executives properly manage the company.

The guidelines state it is desirable for a company to decide executive personnel matters and remuneration by establishing a nomination committee and a remuneration committee, both comprising independent external directors. Nissan, however, did not adhere to this recommendation.

Nissan takes seriously that it allowed Ghosn to treat the company like his personal possession, and plans to discuss the establishment of a nomination committee and a remuneration committee.

Nissan has recently faced sluggish sales. In the United States, where the firm has a strong presence, Nissan’s new car sales dropped 6.4 percent to 1.23 million units from January through October. Overall foreign sales in the same period dropped 2.8 percent.

Saikawa is facing strong criticism that he has failed to offer clear explanations regarding a series of improper practices over inspections of completed vehicles that have come to light since September last year.

Calls for Saikawa and other current Nissan executives to take responsibility are expected to increase in the near future.



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


The Japan News
About the Author: The Japan News is published by The Yomiuri Shimbun, which boasts the largest circulation in the world.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Analysis

Collateral Advantage: Opportunities for Asean nations in the trade war

Quinn Libson looks at how ASEAN countries could prosper despite the trade war between the US and China. Optimism about a potential trade deal between the United States and China faded in late May when President Donald Trump accused Beijing of backtracking on agreements. Trump followed up the accusation with a punitive tariff hike of more than double to 25% on Chinese goods worth $200 billion. He also threatened to increase tariffs on the remaining $300 billion worth of goods China exports to the US annually. Early in June, China responded by raising tariffs to 25% on many of the $60 billion worth US export products. When the world’s two largest economies exchange blows on goods worth billions of dollars, it’s impossible for other markets to avoid collateral consequences. Asean countries have not been spared the shocks of this trade dispute. But many are also hoping to leverage t


By Quinn Libson
June 10, 2019

Analysis

Read Straits Times’ Asia Report

Special Edition of Straits Times Asia Report available online for free. Straits Times have published the June Issue of their Asia Report online and it is available for free. It is a lovely magazine highlighting the growing tension between China and the US. To read it please click here. 


By Cod Satrusayang
June 5, 2019

Analysis

America’s sincerity in seeking a deal doubtful

A China Daily editorial analyses the new white paper released by China on trade war with US. As China’s White Paper on its trade negotiations with the United States, released on Sunday, shows, the US bears the full responsibility for the stalled trade talks since it is the one that has backtracked on its commitments-at least three times so far. In early February last year, the two sides reached a consensus on their trade frictions, with China agreeing to import more agricultural and energy products. However, the US announced later that month it was imposing 25 percent tariffs on $50 billion worth of Chinese goods. Talks in May then produced the consensus that they would not engage in a trade war, only for the US government to break that consensus 10 days later when it announced it would impose tariffs on more Chinese imports. On Nov 1, 2018, the leaders of China and the US reached an impo


By China Daily
June 4, 2019

Analysis

Today’s US-China clash began at Tiananmen Square

Tuesday is the 30th anniversary of the crackdown. Tuesday marks the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. It was an event that profoundly shaped not only modern China, but also the US-China relationship. It is the odd anniversary that will pass virtually unobserved in the place where it had the greatest impact. Each year, around the anniversary, the government mobilizes an army of censors and trolls to stamp out any discussion of Tiananmen online. Yet for the world outside China, revisiting the Tiananmen Square massacre is crucial for two reasons. The bloody crackdown should remind us of the most fundamental political differences at the heart of today’s US-China competition. And it helps us understand the intimate connection between how China is governed at home and how it behaves on the global stage. First, Tiananmen highlights the ideological core of the US-China rivalry. Tension


By The Korea Herald
June 3, 2019

Analysis

Trump becomes first US leader to inspect Japanese warship

Analysts say its a show of solidarity with Abe. Visiting United States President Donald Trump became the first US Commander-in-Chief to step on board a Japanese warship on Tuesday (May 28), in what the two wartime foes held up as a sign of their ironclad bond as security allies today. Together with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Mr Trump inspected the JS Kaga at the Japanese Maritime Self-Defence Force (MSDF) base in Yokosuka, south of Tokyo. The JS Kaga is one of Japan’s two largest Izumo-class warships. It will modify these helicopter destroyers into its first aircraft carriers since World War II, in a significant defence upgrade that will allow it to handle short take-off and vertical landing F-35B fighter jets.


By The Straits Times
May 29, 2019

Analysis

10 challenges India will face after elections

Regardless of who wins, many challenges awaits the victory of India’s mammoth elections. The results of India’s elections, out on Thursday, will have a huge impact on the direction of the country over the next five years. Exit polls seem to suggest that the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party will remain in power, though others have warned that these surveys have hardly been reliable in the past. If the BJP does return, critics of the government have argued that its willingness to attack Indian institutions and even nominate a terror-accused as a Parliamentary candidate could irrevocably change India. Supporters of the BJP, however, argue that if a motley crew of opposition parties comes to power, India will lack stability and be torn apart by internal contradictions. While either of these things may end up being true, the results of elections alone will not change everything about the country. Over t


By Dawn
May 24, 2019