See More on Facebook

Business

Ghosn declares innocence in 1st appearance in court

He may stay six months in jail while awaiting trial.


Written by

Updated: January 9, 2019

Carlos Ghosn, the former Nissan Motor Co. chairman rearrested on suspicion of aggravated breach of trust under the Companies Law, denied the suspicions in a court hearing held Tuesday to disclose the grounds of his prolonged detention.

Appearing in court, Ghosn, 64, said in his statement of opinion that he had been wrongly accused and unfairly detained based on groundless accusations.

His lawyers intend to request that the court annul the detention after the hearing ends.

It was Ghosn’s first public appearance since he was arrested on Nov. 19 by the special investigation squad of the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office on suspicion of violating the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law by understating his executive remuneration in the company’s securities reports.

Appearing in court in a blackish suit at 10:30 a.m., he seemed somewhat thinner, with his jaw leaner. During questions put to the accused by Presiding Judge Yuichi Tada to establish his identity, Ghosn clearly stated his name and other details.

Ghosn was rearrested on suspicions of aggravated breach of trust that inflicted damage on Nissan. Those suspicions include that he had a valuation loss of about ¥1.85 billion, which he had incurred through his private investment, transferred to Nissan and that he had a total of $14.7 million (about ¥1.6 billion at the current exchange rate) of Nissan’s funds sent to an acquaintance in Saudi Arabia who helped him over guaranteeing credit for the investment contract.

After explaining these charges, the judge said, “Considering the content and nature of the case, the defendant’s depositions and so forth, there is a fear of the defendant approaching officials concerned to destroy evidence.”

The judge also said there is a possibility of Ghosn fleeing the country, as he has bases for living abroad.

Afterward, the hearing of the statement of opinions was held, in which Ghosn said with emphasis that he never inflicted damage on Nissan with the transfer of the valuation loss, one of the two suspicions.

With regard to the provision of money to his acquaintance, Ghosn explained that it was not a private disbursement but was made as compensation on the basis of a request from the acquaintance’s company, and with internal approval at Nissan.

The lawyers made a request to the court on Jan. 4 to disclose the reasons for the continued detention. During an interview held earlier, the defense said there are no suspicions that would support the continued detention and said they would ask the court to explain the reasons for the detention.

After he was arrested on suspicion of violating the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law on Nov. 19, he was indicted on Dec. 10. On the same day, he was rearrested on suspicion of violating the same law.

As the prosecution’s request for extending the detention related to the second arrest was not approved by the court later the same month, there emerged a possibility of his being bailed out. But on Dec. 21, he was rearrested on suspicion of aggravated breach of trust. The court approved his detention for this case until Jan. 11.

Grounds for detention

Disclosure of the grounds for detention is a procedure stipulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure, saying that the court shall explain at a public hearing the reasons to those suspects or defendants under detention, on the basis of Article 34 of the Constitution, which prohibits detention without adequate cause.

It is to be held within five days upon a request made by the suspect or the defendant party. In principle, the suspect or defendant himself and a defense counsel appear before the court, each allowed to state opinions before a judge for no longer than 10 minutes.

Also at the hearing, the judge states which of the required conditions for detention — such as of the likelihood of the destruction of evidence and flight risk — have constituted the grounds for detention, and then explains the circumstances to support the existence of those conditions.

The rights and wrongs of the detention, which have been decided following the arrest, are not reconsidered by the judge at this hearing. After listening to the judge’s explanation, the defendant party needs to make another request, if it seeks annulment of the detention.

According to judiciary statistics, about 100,000 detention decisions were made by the courts in the country in 2017. There were only 474 cases — less than 1 percent of the total — whereby the procedures for requesting disclosure of the grounds for detention were carried out.

There has been criticism from lawyers and others who say, “The grounds disclosed by judges are abstract, and the system has been eviscerated.”



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


About the Author: The Straits Times is Singapore's top-selling newspaper.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Business

Apple says Korea should not interfere in issues with telecom operators

The tech giant says that regulators should leave its interactions with local telecom companies alone. South Korea’s top antitrust watchdog should not interfere in business dealings between Apple and local mobile carriers, which should operate by market rules, Apple’s legal representative in Korea said. “The FTC should not waste its resources on business dealings legally made by the market mechanism and based on long negotiations between Apple and Korean telecom companies (SKT, KT and LG Uplus),” Oh Keum-seok, a partner at Seoul’s BKL law firm that represents Apple, told The Korea Herald. “If Apple faces sanctions from the FTC, this will set a bad precedent for foreign companies doing business in Korea,” he said.


By The Korea Herald
January 15, 2019

Business

What does Vietnam’s new cyber law mean for online dissent?

Will Facebook kowtow to the Vietnamese government to keep its market share. Facebook is in violation of a Vietnamese new cybersecurity law by allowing its users to post content critical of the communist government on its platform, the Ministry of Information and Communication announced on Wednesday of last week. The news came just days after the law went into effect on Jan. 1. The new legislation requires internet companies to comply with government demands to remove user-posted material it doesn’t like. The law also stipulates that information technology companies—Facebook and Google for instance—may be required to set up local offices and store customer data domestically, a feature which human rights advocates worry might make it easier for the government to track and charge dissidents for their online activities. This new legislation follows a pattern of increasing digital scrutiny by th


By Quinn Libson
January 15, 2019

Business

Huawei to end employment of staff arrested in Poland for spying

Huawei has been accused by countries of spying for Chinese government. Huawei announced on Saturday evening that it would terminate employment of Wang Weijing, who was detained in Poland on suspicion of spying, CCTV reported. Wang’s alleged actions have no relation to the company, according to Huawei. “In accordance with the terms and conditions of Huawei’s labor contract, we have made this decision because the incident in question has brought Huawei into disrepute,” said Huawei. “Huawei complies with all applicable laws and regulations in the countries where it operates, and we require every employee to abide by the laws and regulations in the countries where they are based,” said Huawei.


By China Daily
January 14, 2019

Business

Talks calm trade climate for Beijing, Washington

For the trade war, more talks means less tension. The latest round of vice-ministerial level trade talks between China and the United States, which concluded on Wednesday, have laid a foundation for addressing each other’s concerns, the Ministry of Commerce said on Thursday. Both sides have actively implemented the significant consensus reached by their heads of state and conducted extensive, in-depth and detailed exchanges on trade and structural issues of common concern, Gao Feng, the ministry’s spokesman, said at a news briefing on Thursday. The meetings between China and the US began on Monday in Beijing. According to a statement released by the ministry on Thursday morning, the two sides improved mutual understanding. Both sides agreed to continue to keep in close contact, the statement said. On Dec 1, the top leaders of China and the US met on the sidelines of the


By China Daily
January 11, 2019

Business

Fugitive Jho Low says no connection between 1Mdb and China

Jho Low rubbishes Wall Street Journal report about China’s alleged role in 1MDB probe. Fugitive businessman Jho Low has dismissed a report by the Wall Street Journal linking China to Malaysian state investment fund 1MDB as “a continuation of a trial by media” led by Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad. The Journal said in a report on Monday (Jan 7) that senior Chinese leaders offered in 2016 to help bail out 1Malaysia Development Berhad or 1MDB, which is at the centre of a swelling, multi-billion-dollar graft scandal. The report cited minutes from a series of previously undisclosed meetings. Chinese officials told visiting Malaysians that China would use its influence to try to get the United States and other countries to drop their probes of allegations


By The Straits Times
January 10, 2019

Business

Korea seizes Japanese companies asset over wartime forced labor

Japan has summoned Seoul’s ambassador in protest. The seizure of Korean assets of Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal over Japan’s wartime use of South Korean forced labor went into effect Wednesday, prompting the Japanese government to summon South Korean ambassador to Tokyo in protest. The Daegu District Court’s Pohang branch approved the seizure last week, as the firm has refused to follow the Oct. 30 ruling by the top court here to compensate four South Koreans forced into labor during Japan’s 1910-45 occupation of the Korean Peninsula. The assets of Nippon Steel have been frozen as the company received the documents ordering the seizure. Japan’s Vice Foreign Minister Takeo Akiba summoned South Korean ambassador to Tokyo, Lee Su-hoon, on Wednesday in protest and expressed regret over the decision. After the 10-minute talks with Akiba, Lee told reporters


By The Korea Herald
January 10, 2019