See More on Facebook

Current affairs

Myriad factors Nepalese hamper probe into offshore investment, money laundering

Businessmen exploiting legal loopholes while channelising illicit cash into the country.


Written by

Updated: January 22, 2019

A damning report by the Centre for Investigative Journalism-Nepal (CIJ-Nepal), released on Wednesday, said around two-thirds of the foreign direct investment was coming into Nepal from tax haven countries and that around 55 Nepalis and non-Nepali residents had invested in offshore companies, setting off alarm bells in the country.

Government agencies were quick to respond, saying they will launch a probe.

But investigation into a similar case—the Panama Papers released in April 2016 that said as many as 19 Nepalis and non-residents Nepalis had invested in offshore companies—has barely made any progress. Officials blame various factors, including ineffective agencies and lack of information and legal loopholes, for slow progress in investigation into such cases.

Finance Minister Yubaraj Khatiwada admits that the Department of Money Laundering Investigation (DMLI) largely failed to carry out its work in an effective manner when it was under the Ministry of Finance. “It has been 10 years since the department was established, but it has failed to take up the cases in the desired numbers,” says Khatiwada. The DMLI is now under the Prime Minister’s Office.

“We have been looking into [money laundering] cases since the Panama Papers. We are investigating whether those who have parked their money in foreign countries have taken the central bank approval or not. We have to make sure whether those named in the leaks are Nepalis or not. We also need to find where they are currently settled,” says Khatiwada, hinting that there is a myriad issues that need to be dealt with while investigating into cases related to offshore investments and money laundering in the name of the FDI.

Khatiwada, however, did point out that some businessmen were exploiting legal loopholes. As per the Non-resident Nepali Act, anyone staying in a foreign country continuously for 182 days gets the status of non-resident Nepali and that person’s earning during that time is counted as a non-resident’s earnings. “When this money comes into Nepal, its status is foreign investment; and the person concerned can take the capital, interest and profit out of the country. This Act was brought with good intentions,” he said. “While we want to make our laws stricter, we have also left legal loopholes.”

But that aside, many say nexus between unscrupulous businessmen and politicians is the biggest bane of good governance and transparency in Nepal and that a web of factors is helping some powerful people turn their black money into white.

The DMLI has lost its teeth largely due to political interference, said former finance secretary Shanta Raja Subedi.

“Frequent leadership change at the behest of politicians always makes an institution weak. And at times chiefs of the agency have their own personal interest,” he said. “The DMLI should be developed as a constitutional body to prevent political influence so that it can take on the powerful people.”

The DMLI has seen 10 directors general in the last nine years.

Another highly placed government source agrees that most of those indicted in the leaks enjoy political protection. “One of the reasons why many of those indicted in such leaks have not been brought to book is: they have strong political connections,” the source said. “As soon as the names are in the public domain, such individuals start lobbying, and the case fails to take off.”

But a DMLI official told the post that investigation into those who were indicted in the Panama Papers is still on and that the agency was still gathering proof.

“We don’t have solid proof against them,” Binod Lamichhane, information officer at the DMLI, told the Post. As per him, none of the 19 persons named in the Panama Papers face any cases as of now “for the lack of proof”.

In the aftermath of the Panama Papers leak, world’s most powerful were spooked while many high profile politicians, including the prime ministers of Pakistan and Iceland had fallen from grace. But Nepal’s biggest leak last week seems to have minimal effect.

Lack of information exchange is one reason for slow investigation in Nepal, says Khatiwada. Nepal also has not signed Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with many of those countries which are known as tax havens. “We need to work on this. Firstly, we need to sign Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with the countries [from where money is said to have entered Nepal]. When information exchange is difficult, it affects the investigation process,” he said.

 



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


The Kathmandu Post
About the Author: The Kathmandu Post was Nepal’s first privately owned English broadsheet daily and is currently the country's leading English-language newspaper.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Current affairs

SAARC turns 35 but has very little to show for its age

The regional bloc of seven South Asian countries and Afghanistan has largely been held hostage to the rivalry between India and Pakistan, say analysts. The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation might have turned 35 but its three-and-a-half decades of existence has largely failed to advance its own central tenet—regional cooperation. As SAARC marked its 35th anniversary with a flurry of congratulatory messages from heads of government, expressing their commitment to regional cooperation, many analysts and diplomats wonder if these promises will ever translate into action. The regional association has failed to hold its 19th summit, ever since 2016 when India sud


By The Kathmandu Post
December 9, 2019

Current affairs

Why Hong Kong residents turned out in record numbers to vote

Many say events of past 5 months galvanised their desire to exercise their democratic right. Amid mild autumn weather and under a clear blue sky in Lek Yuen, the oldest public housing estate in Hong Kong’s Sha Tin, a snaking queue formed outside the community hall shortly after dawn yesterday. It was the constituency’s polling station of the day, and hundreds were in the line before the opening time of 7.30am to vote for their district councillor, one of the lowest rungs of Hong Kong’s elected offices. The scene was repeated across the territory’s 18 districts, where nearly three million people showed up to vote in elections that are usually a quiet affair, with chosen officials confined to dealing with noise complaints and local infrastructure improvement projects. The officials, however, also represent 117 of the 1,200-strong Election Committee that chooses the city̵


By The Straits Times
November 25, 2019

Current affairs

Nearly 1,000 China nationals nabbed in Malaysia

They are believed to be online scam workers. Malaysian authorities have nabbed nearly 1,000 China nationals who were believed to be working in the country with an online scam syndicate, local media reported. The bust on Wednesday (Nov 20) by the Immigration Department in Cyberjaya was the biggest conducted this year, Bernama news agency said. On its Facebook, department said the raid was conducted at the syndicate’s headquarters in Cyberjaya. Immigration director-general Khairul Dzaimee Daud said the syndicate was operating from a six-storey building in Cyberjaya, a high-technology zone located about an hour south of Kuala Lumpur. The raid was the end result of a month’s worth of surveillance, following complaints from the public. The office was well secured, with guards stationed at each floor and rooms only being accessible with access cards, The Star reported.


By The Straits Times
November 22, 2019

Current affairs

MH17 probe releases new phone calls linking suspects to top Russians

With contributions by AFP. A Dutch-led probe into the shooting-down of flight MH17 over Ukraine in 2014 released new intercepted phone calls on Thursday (Nov 14) between high-ranking Russian officials and suspects facing trial over the crash. Investigators said they were making a “new witness appeal” based on “recorded telephone calls between the leaders of the DPR (Donetsk People’s Republic, a separatist group) and high-ranking Russian officials.” “Ties between Russian officials and DPR leaders appear to have been much closer” than originally believed, Mr Andy Kraag, the head of Dutch police’s Criminal Investigations Division, said in a video statement. Investigators said in June that they were going to put three Rus


By Warren Fernandez
November 15, 2019

Current affairs

Five years later, prosecutorial probe kicks off into Sewol ferry sinking

For some families, it is too little, too late. The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office on Monday launched a special investigation unit to probe allegations surrounding the sinking of the Sewol ferry in 2014. During a press briefing at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office, the unit said it is “committed to making its probe so thorough that it will be the last one to be conducted into the Sewol sinking.” The unit will take on investigations conducted by a provisional state commission formed in January 2015 with a fact-finding mission on the Sewol case. This is the prosecution’s first organized effort concerning the disaster from over five years ago. On April 16, 2014, the 6,825-ton ferry with a passenger capacity of 921 sank off the coast of South Jeolla Province en route to Jeju Island, killing over 300 people, mostly children. The 18-member prosecution unit is headed by


By Zaffar Abbas
November 12, 2019

Current affairs

Ayodhya verdict is silent on why Muslims must prove exclusive possession of site

The Indian court has deprived Muslims of the disputed plot because they couldn’t show exclusive possession before 1857. On page 215 of the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid verdict, delivered by a five-judge bench on Saturday, the Supreme Court makes a crucial statement of logic: “It is true that in matters of faith and belief, the absence of evidence may not be evidence of absence.” But in its final findings, the court contradicted this same logic. The crux of the judgment that India has awaited since 1949 is that Muslims failed to show unimpeded possession of the disputed site in Ayodhya between 1528, when the mosque was supposedly built by Mughal emperor Babur, and 1857, when, after a clash between Muslims and Hindus, a railing was erected between the inner and outer courtyards at the disputed site. The inner courtyard is where the mosque demolished by Hindutva mobs in 1992 stood. The outer courtyard has se


By Asia News Network
November 12, 2019