See More on Facebook

Culture and society

Feature: The curious case of the Indonesian passport

I will never forget the first time I realized how powerless my Indonesian passport really is.


Written by

Updated: February 21, 2019

You see it all the time in Hollywood films: Main characters nonchalantly get on a plane to fly somewhere abroad, impulsively booking a trip to a foreign destination and effortlessly going after a golden opportunity that lies ahead, wherever it may be – without having to bother with any visa requirements.

For citizens of countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, South Korea and Australia, such spontaneous acts are a reality. Not so much for Indonesians like me.

In March 2011, my best friend and I won a short trip to London. However, we were notified of our good luck just two weeks prior to departure.

Being both first-timers to the UK, we did our research on how to get a British visa and quickly contacted the organizers to ask them to send us a sponsorship letter.

Aside from us and two others from Indonesia, the rest of the winners were from Malaysia and the UK. Fortunately for the Malaysians, they did not need a visa to enter Britain, which also means they did not need to prepare the complicated paperwork required to apply for one at the time. Oh, how I envied them.

Unfortunately for us, the organizer, which was a Malaysian company, responded very slowly to our request for a sponsorship letter. They finally emailed it to us a mere week prior to the trip. Also, like we didn’t have enough problems already, they failed to send us the return tickets for the Kuala Lumpur-London flight and the London hotel bookings on time, so we could not include them in our tourist visa applications.

With only five working days left to apply for a visa, we initially planned to use the services of a travel agency, hoping for a smoother process. We contacted two of them and both immediately turned us down, saying that we would need at least two weeks to apply, adding that since we had never visited any “significant” countries like the US and Japan or any European nations prior to this trip meant our chance of obtaining a UK visa on such short notice was very small. I’ve been on trips abroad before, including to ASEAN countries, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau, but apparently none of those seemed to matter much.

Determined to pursue our dream trip, we decided to apply for the visa ourselves, which at the time was required to be done online anyway.

Read also: ‘Roma’ actor Jorge Antonio Guerrero granted US visa after three denied attempts

After submitting the application forms online, we printed them to submit them offline via a service provider called PT VFS Services Indonesia (VFS) alongside other documents, which included old and new passports, copies of family cards, birth certificates and identity cards, employment verification letters, bank statements, flight bookings (we could only provide the return Jakarta-Kuala Lumpur tickets that we had bought ourselves), hotel bookings (we could only include ones in Kuala Lumpur) and the sponsorship letter. We also included a full itinerary of our daily activities in London to show the UK Embassy that our activities there were well planned.

When we finally submitted the application to VFS on a Thursday afternoon, we requested it to be marked “URGENT”. I was then asked to write a short note (a love letter, I called it) explaining the urgency of the matter, right in front of the VFS employee.

The visa fee was Rp 1.05 million (US$74.44), plus an additional Rp 25,000 fee for notification by SMS.

On the afternoon of the following Monday, I received a call from a British Embassy officer who interviewed me regarding my visa application: My purpose in London, whether I knew anyone there (I did not) and my planned activities during the trip. At the end of the interview, I asked whether the visa could be issued by the upcoming Wednesday. She said it was up to the embassy.

On Wednesday morning, the last day I could pick up my passport, I called VFS to learn the status of my visa application. The operator said it was still being processed and such applications usually took two weeks to process. I felt like all hope was lost (but I had already packed my suitcase just in case).

A few hours after that call, I received an SMS notifying that my passport was available for pick-up at the VFS office – a six-month multiple-entry UK visa had been stuck to one of the pages.

Needless to say, that London trip became one of my most memorable ones, but it was also a reminder of how low my global mobility was as an Indonesian passport holder.

Depending on which report you’re looking at, the power of the Indonesian passport is currently ranked 61st out of 97, or 72nd out of 104. According to the former, released by the Passport Index, Indonesians can enter 35 countries without visas, 39 countries using visa-on-arrival (VoA) and are required to apply for visas to visit 124 countries. Meanwhile, the latter, based on the Henley Passport Index, suggests that for Indonesian passport holders 71 destinations around the world are visa-free or require only VoA and 155 require visas in advance.

Despite that Indonesian citizens can only freely visit 71 countries, Indonesia welcomes citizens of 169 countries without requiring visas or only demanding VoA, according to the Passport Index, which ranked the archipelago quite high at 17 in its “global welcoming countries” score.

Indonesia’s goal for expanding visa-free access since 2015 is clear: to lure more foreign tourists to the country. However, the country still failed to reach its target of attracting 17 million foreign visitors in 2018 – only having recorded 15.81 million foreign tourist arrivals throughout the year.

Opening the door wide is perhaps a good idea to attract big-spending tourists we hope would help boost the local economy, but it is not without risks amid a rise of “begpackers”, a kind of backpacker-style traveler who can be found exploring low-cost countries like Indonesia on such low budgets that they don’t hesitate to ask for financial support or freebies from local people.

You might ask why Indonesia is not high on most countries’ visa-free lists. International law expert Hikmahanto Juwana of the University of Indonesia saidthat terrorism (of which Indonesians have been known to be the perpetrators), the fact that Indonesian tourists are not seen as potential big spenders by many countries and weak law enforcement that may lead to the misuse of documents are among the potential reasons. All of them are valid and should be regarded as important assessments and perceptions of Indonesia, especially in terms of its national security status and national economic prowess.

Hence, other than focusing on our “global welcoming countries” score, we should also make efforts to increase the ranking of our passport’s power and strive to be on par with the likes of the United Arab Emirates, Germany, Japan and Singapore, which now hold the top spots as the world’s most powerful passports.

by KESHIE HERNITANINGTYAS



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


The Jakarta Post
About the Author: The Jakarta Post is one of Indonesia's leading English-language daily newspapers.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Culture and society

Ayodhya: Coming full circle

Ishan Joshi writes about the recent Ayodhya verdict. Nearly 27 years to the day when as a raw 20-year-old political reporter for The Statesman I reached Ayodhya to cover the run-up to and, as it happened, the aftermath of the demolition of a medieval mosque on 6 December 1992, my primary concern was to find out whether I would get eggs for breakfast. Information I had picked up on the drive down from the state capital Lucknow to Ayodhya was that the temple town, in keeping with its status as a holy city, did no “non-veg.” Such things were important to me, then.  Now, in an effort to prolong my late youth, as it were, oats/idli/low-fat yogurt and the like are my victuals of choice for breakfast. But that’s not all that’s changed. The Supreme Court’s verdict in the Ayodhya Case last week means a Ram Temple will soon be built


By Ishan Joshi
November 18, 2019

Culture and society

Death of militant heads will stunt recruitment but not kill it

ISIS has a foothold in Southeast Asia. The deaths of Malaysian militant leaders Akel Zainal and Mohd Rafi Udin will reduce the intensity of recruitment for the Islamic State (IS) but not completely kill it, says a terrorism expert. Dr Ahmad El-Muhammady, a political science lecturer at the International Islamic University of Malaysia, said the recruitment of Malaysians into the terror group might continue undetected in some cases. “Their deaths will certainly have an impact among Malaysian IS fighters. While their deaths may reduce the intensity of recruitment, it will not completely kill it, ” he said. Commenting on the power vacuum among Malaysian IS fighters in Syria following the deaths of Akel and Mohd Rafi, Dr Ahmad said there was no longer a central Malaysian figure in Syria.


By The Star
November 15, 2019

Culture and society

Bangladesh charges 25 in student’s death

‘They sought to strike terror into students’. The accused in Buet student Abrar Fahad murder case had turned so rowdy that they often tortured general students to establish a reign of terror on the campus. Their efforts to create terror resulted in Abrar killing, DMP Additional Commissioner Monirul Islam said as police pressed charges against 25 Buet students, mostly leaders and activists of the university’s BCL unit, in the case yesterday. The move came 37 days after Abrar, a second year student of electrical


By Daily Star
November 14, 2019

Culture and society

Terminating GSOMIA may send ‘wrong’ message to adversaries

Wartime OPCON transfer is contingent upon conditions being met, says top US military official stationed in Korea. By terminating its bilateral intelligence-sharing agreement with Japan, South Korea risks sending the wrong message — that the trilateral alliance of South Korea, the US and Japan is weak — Gen. Robert Abrams, commander of the US-ROK Combined Forces Command, said Tuesday. Marking his first year in office, Abrams, who also commands United States Forces Korea and the United Nations Command, spoke on a series of current issues, including the ongoing defense cost-sharing negotiations and the alliance, during a joint press interview.


By The Korea Herald
November 14, 2019

Culture and society

Uncertainty persists on US – China trade deal

This despite Trump’s comments that US and China close to trade deal. US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday (Nov 12) that the United States and China are close to a trade deal, but made clear that the prospect of tariffs was still on the table, with a warning that the US would raise tariffs on China if no trade deal was reached. His speech at the Economic Club of New York was closely watched by Wall Street but offered no new details on any signing of a much-touted “Phase One” preliminary trade deal with China. China, said President Trump, was dying to make a deal with their “supply chains cracking very badly” almost two years into the trade war. “We’re the ones deciding whether or not we want t


By The Straits Times
November 13, 2019

Culture and society

Ayodhya verdict is silent on why Muslims must prove exclusive possession of site

The Indian court has deprived Muslims of the disputed plot because they couldn’t show exclusive possession before 1857. On page 215 of the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid verdict, delivered by a five-judge bench on Saturday, the Supreme Court makes a crucial statement of logic: “It is true that in matters of faith and belief, the absence of evidence may not be evidence of absence.” But in its final findings, the court contradicted this same logic. The crux of the judgment that India has awaited since 1949 is that Muslims failed to show unimpeded possession of the disputed site in Ayodhya between 1528, when the mosque was supposedly built by Mughal emperor Babur, and 1857, when, after a clash between Muslims and Hindus, a railing was erected between the inner and outer courtyards at the disputed site. The inner courtyard is where the mosque demolished by Hindutva mobs in 1992 stood. The outer courtyard has se


By Dawn
November 12, 2019