See More on Facebook

Diplomacy, Politics

India’s political parties and their foreign policy platform

Where do India’s major political parties stand on foreign policy issues in Elections 2019.

Written by

Updated: May 13, 2019

Foreign policy debates have historically been foreign to Indian election campaigns.

But photo-ops with international leaders are always welcome because they help burnish the credentials of politicians with the domestic audience.

Images of India’s first Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru rubbing shoulders with Presidents Sukarno and Nasser of Indonesia and Egypt, respectively, at the Asia-Africa Bandung Conference in 1955 certainly did his image as a world statesman no harm.

The television broadcast of his daughter, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, being enveloped in a surprise bear hug by ‘elder brother’ Fidel Castro at the 1983 Non-Aligned Movement Conference in New Delhi, was widely thought to have humanised the otherwise aloof Mrs G for millions in India.

In more recent times, Rajiv Gandhi’s 1988 visit to Beijing, the first time an Indian Prime Minister journeyed to China in over three decades, and the warm welcome extended to him by Deng Xiaoping, provided a considerable boost to the then Indian PM’s image at home.

Ditto, former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s meetings with former US President George W Bush between 2007-09 when the two leaders signed the Indo-US nuclear deal which effectively ended India’s international isolation on the nuclear issue.

And, of course, there’s the current Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, praised and reviled in equal measure for the robust hugs he dispenses to world leaders. Modi has unquestionably built a personal rapport with key world leaders from Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Yet, it is important to note that as India’s weeks-long polling process draws to a close, foreign policy issues have found little or no space in the campaigns of the two major parties, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the principal Opposition Congress Party.

At best, it could be said, the issues emanating from India’s relations with countries around the globe including in Asia have impacted the election discourse only tangentially.

The situation is entirely counter-intuitive given India’s aggregate GDP is now close to $3 trillion and is ranked fifth in the world.

India’s total annual trade, in goods and services, too is now little over $1 trillion. Plus, there is the country’s increasing military footprint and soft power outreach which compliments its growing economic heft

For example, there is no mention on the stump of the ‘Look East’ policy, which was a seminal Indian pivot towards East and South-east Asia, first enunciated by former Prime Minister Narasimha Rao of the Congress (1991-96) and then carried forward by the administration of his successor AB Vajpayee of the BJP (1998-2004).

Neither has there been any discussion on the progression of Look East to ‘Act East’, initiated by the Manmohan Singh-led administration of the Congress over two consecutive terms (2004-14).

Both these campaigns have ostensibly been pushed by the Modi administration but there is no mention of them on the campaign trail.

But while there’s a telling silence in terms of external engagement impacting trade, commerce, energy security, tourism, cultural exchanges, people-to-people contacts and geostrategy, they all translate into everyday issues that do find mention in the campaigns of both major parties and their respective allies.

So, the issue of cheap Chinese-manufactured goods flooding the Indian market is a major point of ire among India’s small traders and mom-and-pop stores, traditionally the BJP’s strongest supporters.

Similarly, the rising price of fuel – India imports more than 80% of its crude oil requirements — for a price-sensitive middle class of as many as 600 million people as well as for the transport and agriculture sectors is a huge campaign issue for the Opposition in elections 2019.

Terrorism and national security, issues directly linked to India’s foreign policy priorities, form the main campaign plank of the Modi-led BJP as it seeks re-election.

The insatiable Indian desire for quality education and employment abroad, whether in the traditional destinations of UK/US/Canada or now increasingly in Singapore/Australia, are also subject to the relationship New Delhi has with these nations.

In sum, foreign policy is not an issue qua issue in the election but some of the major talking points in the 2019 poll are a result of India’s constantly evolving relationships within Asia and in the world.

That India’s multitude of smaller, regional parties are either broadly aligned with the Congress or line up with the BJP when it comes to foreign policy – provides an insight into their respective notions of what constitutes the national interest.

The third party’s whose manifesto on foreign affairs is very different is the main party of India’s parliamentary left, the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M).


A recent article in The Diplomat points out the party has outlined seven primary foreign policy priorities for India, which the manifesto notes is “emerging as a power and connecting stakeholders in a multi-polar world.”

  • To “safeguard global commons” and “strengthen India’s role as a first responder for disaster relief/humanitarian assistance and develop partnerships for disaster resilient infrastructure.”
  • To facilitate knowledge exchange and technology transfer internationally, including the creation of an International Space Technology Alliance.
  • To emphasise the importance for India to interact with Indians and people of Indian-origin abroad.
  • To initiate “concrete steps” at international fora to take action against “countries and organizations supporting terrorism.” (Though Pakistan is not directly named in the document, the manifesto states that India will continue to “isolate such countries.”)
  • To underscore India’s interest in “ensuring an open, inclusive, prosperous and secure Indo-Pacific.”
  • To leverage India’s role in international institutions, including the United Nations, G20, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Commonwealth in the fight against “global evils” including corruption.
  • To continue to press India’s claim for a permanent seat in a (reformed) United Nations Security Council.

But when it comes to substantive details the BJP resorts to suitably vague if high-sounding principles such as Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world is one family) as the basis for India’s interaction with the world in various spheres.


The Congress, as the challenger, seems to have put more thought into the foreign policy aspect of its manifesto as it realises it has to do the running.

The Citizen goes as far as to make the claim that the foreign policy determinants for the Congress “are like a rescue mission for Indian diplomacy… which over the past five years prioritised the extrapolation of Modi’s own political persona on the country’s foreign policy.”

That may or may not be hyperbole from a simpatico source but the Congress in its manifesto promises to:

  • Establish a National Council on Foreign Policy with statutory status — comprising of members of the Cabinet, national security experts and domain specialists – to advise the government.
  • Resuscitate the moribund National Security Advisory Board to make it a “permanent, professional body advising the government” on foreign, security and strategic affairs. Also, the National Security Council as well as the post of National Security Adviser would be given statutory status.
  • Pass a Law on asylum in keeping with universal treaties as India has no extant law under which asylum-seekers’ applications can be processed and is not a signatory to the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention.
  • Make efforts to revive the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC). The manifesto is, however, silent on how it proposes to deal with Pakistan’s presence in the regional body.
  • Differentiate India’s relentless fight against terrorism from the practical need to engage Pakistan on pressing bilateral concerns while highlighting India’s special relations with SAARC countries
  • Address the problem of terrorism by “persuading other countries to compel Pakistan to verifiably end its support to terror groups that it shelters” and work towards engaging with the UN to constantly review its terror financing and sanctions lists.
  • Coordinate with neighbouring countries including Sri Lanka and Pakistan to avoid conflagrations when fishermen from either side stray into the territorial waters of the other.


The communists’ manifesto, as it were, highlights traditional hard-left positions premised on a somewhat static worldview in its foreign policy section:

  • India should distance itself from the US, revise the India-US nuclear agreement and defence cooperation arrangements.
  • New Delhi ought to take the lead in promoting global nuclear disarmament
  • India must actively work towards establishing global multipolarity.
  • A foreign policy priority for India should be to reactivate SAARC.



Enjoyed this story? Share it.

About the Author:

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia

Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.

By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Diplomacy, Politics

Moon faces daunting task to revive stalled nuke talks

After 2 years of peace efforts, tension back on Korean Peninsula with NK-US tug-of-war. Just hours before South Korean President Moon Jae-in was set to appear in his first televised interview with a local broadcaster on May 9 marking his second anniversary of presidency, North Korea fired two short-range missiles. The surprising move came less than a week after it launched multiple projectiles into the East Sea on May 4. During what could have been a celebratory interview looking back on his past two years, Moon warned the North that such military actions would only heighten tensions on the Korean Peninsula. But he appeared cautious to call it a “provocation” and lightly touched on the possibilities of Pyongyang violating inter-Korean agreements and UN resolutions.

By The Korea Herald
May 20, 2019

Diplomacy, Politics

Pro-junta bloc says it’s ready to form a government

The group claims deal with Democrats, Bhumjaithai parties. The Pro-Junta Phalang Pracharat Party claimed to have successfully cobbled together a coalition that could form a new government with the participation of the Democrat and Bhumjaithai parties, a source from the major coalition partner said yesterday. Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha will again head the post-election administration, with many members of his current post-coup Cabinet joining him, including General Prawit Wongsuwan, General Anupong Paochinda, Somkid Jatusripitak and Wissanu Krea-ngam, according to the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. However, it remained unclear if Prayut would also double as defence minister or allow Prawit to assume the post again in addition to the deputy PM’s post. Phalang Pracharath will get at least 16 Cabinet seats and the Democrats and Bhumjaith

By The Nation (Thailand)
May 20, 2019

Diplomacy, Politics

Jakarta on edge ahead of protests against election results

The opposition has yet to yield and admit defeat. Indonesia is on edge following plans by an Islamist group to hold a two-day rally at the elections commission (KPU) on Tuesday (May 21), to protest the impending results of last month’s presidential polls. The call for Muslims to throng the streets around the KPU headquarters in downtown Jakarta has been circulating on social media at the weekend – just before Wednesday’s deadline for the official vote count to be completed. The rally organisers, who identified themselves as Persaudaraan Alumni 212, are calling the mass gathering a “constitutional Jihad”, according to publicity material seen by The Straits Times on Sunday (May 19).

By The Straits Times
May 20, 2019

Diplomacy, Politics

Exit polls show Narendra Modi’s coalition set to return to power

Most pre-election surveys had suggested that India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi would return to power. Exit polls predicted Prime Minister Narendra Modi will return to power in a landslide win as curtains came down on the largest democratic exercise in the world. Voters in 59 constituencies voted on Sunday (May 19), ending the seven-phase elections in which 900 million people were eligible to vote. At least four exit polls, which were released half an hour after the voting ended, showed between 286 to 306 seats for the alliance led by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). They pr

By The Straits Times
May 20, 2019

Diplomacy, Politics

Blip on Modi’s social media, communications radar

Has Modi’s social media policy backfired. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attempts to ‘humanise’ himself over the past 10 days or so seem to have boomeranged. At least on social media. For a politician who has championed the use of social media platforms and integrated them into his communications strategy to gain direct access to the people without the “filter” of intermediaries, that’s saying something.  Modi refused to hold even a single Press conference through his five-year tenure as PM and keeping professional media at arm’s length.  But he went on an interview spree in the past fortnight aimed at reaching out to voters in the last two phases of India’s weeks-long general election. Informal, one-on-one interactions with leading television anchors and editors of m

By Ishan Joshi
May 20, 2019

Diplomacy, Politics

Can Pakistan play a role in Iran-US tensions

An editorial in Dawn newspaper looks at the role that Pakistan might play in the ongoing tensions. Tensions between the US and Iran, particularly in the Gulf, are rising and the situation has sent alarm bells ringing throughout the region. It is in this context that Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said on Tuesday that Pakistan was “closely following the situation” and would take a stand “that best served the national interest”. Pakistan is, of course, in a sensitive position as it has decades-old, deep relations with the US, while it shares a long border with Iran. Moreover, this country’s ties with the Gulf Arabs — particularly the Saudis — who are firmly in the American camp, are also cordial and have a strategic and defence dimension. In case of any hostilities

By Dawn
May 17, 2019