See More on Facebook

Analysis, Diplomacy

ASEAN meets in Bangkok but old problems remain

As ASEAN’s leaders attend the bloc’s annual two-day summit in Bangkok, many unasked and unanswered questions remain about the group’s viability going forward.


Written by

Updated: June 24, 2019

Since its conception 52-years ago, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations has maintained a policy of political non-interference. All statements released together as a group must be unanimously approved less it hinder domestic considerations.

During the last 52 years, many countries within the bloc have transitioned from despotic, totalitarian rule to semi-democratic and fully democratic states. Gone are the Marcos, Suhartos and Sarits of yesteryear, replaced by a new guard with clearer mandates and blossoming economies.

But as ASEAN members have transitioned and politically matured, so to has the world around the region. Gone are the black and white days of the cold war, replaced by a burgeoning China, a still powerful United States and competing transnational corporations all vying for the region’s currency, its workforce and its favour.

Convenient non-interference

But as ASEAN members have matured, the bloc itself has remained stagnant. Bound by its rules of non-interference, the bloc has not been able to mount a cohesive response to the challenges facing its members states from both without and within.

One example of how this dynamic comes into play is the  South China Sea, which provides several countries with food security and others with natural resources, but is contested by several bloc members and China.

While Brunei, Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines would undoubtedly benefit from a united ASEAN response to China’s growing encroachment, any unanimous response is hindered by Cambodia and Laos who rely on Chinese investment and expertise.

“Is there a consensus among ASEAN nations that China’s operations in the South China Sea is illegal and unfair? Behind closed doors, absolutely,” said one senior Thai diplomat who asked to not be named.

“But you will never get a single voice because Cambodia and Laos will be under pressure to not [upset] their paymasters.”

The South China Sea is not the only topic on which ASEAN members have had to be reticent.

Over the past several years, Myanmar’s treatment of its Muslim minority group, the Rohingya, has drawn the attention of some ASEAN  members including Muslim-majority Indonesia and Malaysia.

According to the United Nations, nearly 1 million Rohingya have fled from Myanmar to neighboring Bangladesh to escape persecution, mass killings and livelihood destructions. One human rights group has gone so far as to call the persecution a genocide.

Both Indonesia and Malaysia have rebuked Myanmar for its action with Malaysia most pointedly breaking the bloc’s long held tradition of political noninterference.

“Myanmar’s security forces are killing even women and children without pity. These are humans. These people are not animals. We may have our differences, but we have to stand together on humanitarian grounds,” said Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi at an ASEAN ministerial meeting radicalisation and violent extremism.

He also questioned Myanmar’s blocking of assistance to the Rohingya.

“If you are really a democratic country as you say you are, then you should not stand in the way of humanitarian aid.”

Yet even as Malaysia and Indonesia delivered public rebukes, the bloc as a whole failed to unanimously condemn the actions of the Myanmar government, which would have sent a much stronger signal regarding the gravity of this situation.

But there is a clear strategic reason these states remain silent

“I think that the reason that countries do not want to condemn, as a bloc, these actions is because they do not want to face the same scrutiny,” said the senior Thai diplomat.

“Everyone is guilty of something in this region. Does Thailand want others to scrutinize its persecution of its dissidents? Does Brunei’s Sultan want his neighbors to scrutinize the new sharia laws that punishes homosexuality? What about Indonesia’s actions in West Papua over the last half century?”

“Non-interference has worked very well for ASEAN.”

China’s sphere

But whether non-interference continues to work well going forward remains to be seen. ASEAN’s inability to form a cohesive, united response to internal and external factors will be tested as regional powers grow in might and ambition.

China, with its aggressive expansion of its One Belt One Road initiative and its Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank, has more say than ever in the affairs of ASEAN nations.

China is currently involved in infrastructure projects in Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar and Thailand. It is selling arms to nearly all ASEAN members. China’s tourists frequent the beaches, temples and mosques of Southeast Asia.

Doing business with China is lucrative. But the cost of doing business with China is to surrender to Beijing’s growing hegemony. Countries have had to be reticent about issues they may feel strongly about less it damage its relationship with beijing.

Needing to Evolve

Throughout the past weekend, ASEAN leaders have professed the necessity for the bloc and its collective bargaining power both behind closed doors and in public. ASEAN, according to the politicians anyway, is a safeguard against foreign encroachment and a united entity to negotiate trade with bigger economic powers.

Yet despite the speeches in Bangkok,  ASEAN has yet to really move beyond the model set over half a century ago of non-interference and weak relationships.  Unless the bloc evolves out of its archaic restrictions and offers a truly united front, the unity that could see the region truly prosper will continue to be handicapped.

 



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


Cod Satrusayang
About the Author: Cod Satrusayang is the Managing Editor at Asia News Network.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Analysis, Diplomacy

Trump again cites questionable numbers related to Korea trade deal

Trump has used the trade deal to bolster his credentials back home. US President Donald Trump again cited questionable numbers on Tuesday as he touted his administration’s renegotiated free trade agreement with South Korea. Trump told the Economic Club of New York that the revised FTA, which took effect early this year, doubled the number of American cars that can be sold in South Korea under US standards and extended American tariffs on Korean pickup trucks by another 20 years to 2041. He then took a swipe at the previous administration of Barack Obama, which negotiated the original agreement. “The deal from the previous admini


By The Korea Herald
November 13, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

Uncertainty persists on US – China trade deal

This despite Trump’s comments that US and China close to trade deal. US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday (Nov 12) that the United States and China are close to a trade deal, but made clear that the prospect of tariffs was still on the table, with a warning that the US would raise tariffs on China if no trade deal was reached. His speech at the Economic Club of New York was closely watched by Wall Street but offered no new details on any signing of a much-touted “Phase One” preliminary trade deal with China. China, said President Trump, was dying to make a deal with their “supply chains cracking very badly” almost two years into the trade war. “We’re the ones deciding whether or not we want t


By The Straits Times
November 13, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

India should have signed up for RCEP

India has decided to put a halt on its joining the largest planned free trade area. Had India not pulled out at the last minute from signing the deal during the 3rd summit of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in Bangkok on November 4, the RCEP would have been the largest free trade area in the world so far—comprising of 16 Asia Pacific countries that house 3.4 billion people, and constituting one-third of the global gross domestic product (GDP) and 40 percent of global trade. Ten member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) along with Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea fo


By The Kathmandu Post
November 13, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

Myanmar sued for genocide

On behalf of OIC, Gambia files the case at Int’l Court of Justice seeking orders to stop atrocities on Rohingyas immediately.  The Gambia has filed a case at the United Nations’ top court, accusing Myanmar of committing genocide against its Rohingya Muslim minority, more than two years after some 750,000 Rohingyas fled a military crackdown in the Rakhine State. “We have just submitted our application to the ICJ under the Genocide Convention,” Gambian Justice Minister Abubacarr Tambadou said at a news conference yesterday in The Hague, where the court is based. “The aim is to get Myanmar to account for its action against its own people: the Rohingya. It is a shame for our generation that we do nothing while genocide is unfolding right under our own eyes,” he said. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), also known as the World Court, is the U


By Daily Star
November 12, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

The government has undermined education

A core value for a country to develop, the federal govenrment must make amends. The High-Level National Education Commission was formed in 2018 to recommend steps to better the country’s education system. After much criticism regarding the secrecy surrounding the findings of the commission, the Education Ministry finally, made public portions of the new education policy. But it seems all is still not well. Analysts and commission members were quick to point out that the new policy has disregarded almost all of the commission’s recommendations, mainly the part where private schools were required to be transformed from ‘for-profit’ to ‘not-for-profit’. Findings of the commission are important documents that ne


By The Kathmandu Post
November 11, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

S. Korea open to settling spat with Japan over intel-sharing pact if relations improve

Intelligence sharing has been suspended since an economic spat between the two countries erupted several months ago. President Moon Jae-in’s top security adviser reaffirmed Sunday that South Korea’s bilateral military intelligence-sharing pact with Japan could be renewed, as the expiration date draws near. Chung Eui-yong, chief of Cheong Wa Dae’s National Security Office, laid the blame on Japan for the strained relations, which have sunk to their lowest point in decades. “The government is willing to rethink an extension of the GSOMIA if South Korea-Japan relations normalize,” he said during a press briefing on Sunday, referring to the


By The Korea Herald
November 11, 2019