See More on Facebook

Diplomacy, Opinion

Opinion: War with Iran benefits no one


Written by

Updated: June 24, 2019

The drumbeat of war in the Persian/Arab Gulf has become incessant in the past few weeks Oil tankers have been mysteriously damaged A US surveillance drone has been shot down by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) Missiles have struck Saudi installations and Basra sites The US has sent a naval armada and 2,500 additional troops to the Gulf, intensified economic pressure and built the legal grounds for military operations against Iran

The world is waking up to the potentially devastating consequences for the region and the world of this professedly unwanted yet inexorable march towards a US-Iran war

The conflict may be ‘limited’ at the outset but could escalate rapidly, eg further attacks on oil tankers in the Hormuz, US ‘retaliation’ against IRGC gunboats and other naval vessels, Iranian missile strikes against US and GCC targets accompanied by attacks by Iranian or Shia militias against US personnel and installations in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and elsewhere, and missile and rocket attacks against Israel and Israeli-occupied territories by Hezbollah and other Iran-allied groups To avoid such anticipated attacks, the US, and possibly Israel, could resort to major pre-emptive aerial strikes to eliminate Iran’s missile and naval capabilities

However, even if such strikes are successful, Iran is unlikely to capitulate (if its resilience during the Iran-Iraq war is any indication) Under external attack, there will be no popular movement in Iran to oust the regime (although President Rouhani and the ‘moderates’ may be replaced by the hardliners and the IRGC) To remove it, the US and its allies would need to launch a full-fledged invasion of Iran Given the experience of Iraq and Afghanistan, neither Washington nor any regional power, has the stomach for it

Even if Russia and China, which America has designated as its ‘rivals’, do not intervene, directly or indirectly, on Tehran’s behalf, the end-state of a war with Iran will be: one, chaos within Iran, with the possible eruption of ethnic insurgencies in its peripheral provinces; two, a war of attrition led by the remnants Iranian regular forces and Shia militias against US and allied forces and installations across the region; three, Tehran-inspired intensification of the conflicts in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan; four, an Iranian denunciation of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and eventual development of nuclear weapons; five, a major and extended interruption in oil exports from the Gulf, pushing prices to unprecedented heights, and six, a global economic recession

War is thus a ‘lose-lose’ option for all those who would be involved in this conflict and even those who are not Regardless of the culpability of those responsible for the reckless actions that have brought the region to the brink of war, common sense, and a sense of self-preservation dictate that the principal parties walk back from the precipice

Any endeavour towards de-escalation will need to address the major causes of the crisis and respond to the concerns of all parties Each of the elements of the current confrontation — nuclear proliferation, regional conflicts, economic sanctions, tanker and missile attacks — have been addressed, if at all, in piecemeal fashion so far They are all interlinked and must be resolved comprehensively and concomitantly

A first step away from the brink could be acceptance of the UN secretary general’s proposal to hold an independent inquiry into the tanker attacks of May and June All parties should pledge not to resort to the use of force while this investigation is under way

Simultaneously, the UN Security Council should demand: one, a halt to the Houthi missile attacks against Saudi and Emirati targets, two, a general ceasefire in Yemen; three, the opening of all avenues for the supply of humanitarian help to the Yemeni population; and four, the initiation of a summit-level dialogue between the main parties to evolve a political solution to the conflict

Most importantly, the EU, the three European parties to the Iran nuclear deal, and Russia and China, with the support of the UN secretary general and General Assembly, should undertake a high-level diplomatic initiative to: 1) convince Tehran not to breach the limitations, especially on nuclear enrichment levels and stocks, contained in the deal; 2) set up an international mechanism (an Instex plus) to enable Iran to conduct trade as per the terms of the deal; 3) press the US to lift the unilateral sanctions it has imposed on Iran, at least progressively in response to reciprocal confidence-building measures undertaken by Iran; 4) secure Iran’s agreement to discuss and address the widespread concern regarding its policies across the region, including in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen and Afghanistan; and 5) establish a mechanism to discuss a missile-and-arms-control regime in the region

Despite Ayatollah Khamanei’s public rejection of talks with the US during the Japanese prime minister’s recent mediatory visit to Tehran, Iran is unlikely to have closed all doors to dialogue Some of Foreign Minister Javad Zarif’s recent statements have mentioned openness to discuss all issues (He once told me that Iran had proposed a ‘grand bargain’ to the US in 2001-2; the response they received was Iran’s inclusion in the ‘axis of evil’ in president George W Bush’s September 2002 speech at the UN General Assembly)

The Trump administration appears to be internally conflicted on its Iran policy There is a general perception that hardliners — National Security Adviser John Bolton, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo — are pushing President Trump towards a war with Iran But Trump may be using them,

wittingly or otherwise, as part of his ‘art of the deal’ negotiating strategy His main objective is to secure re-election in 2020 ‘Success’ in dealing with Iran would enhance his electoral prospects But a war with an uncertain outcome is a risky strategy He has notably responded cautiously to the drone downing A major diplomatic success would be a preferable option for Trump

Although Iran is not always an easy neighbour, Pakistan has multiple reasons to prevent a war against it Over the past 40 years, several ‘independent’ Muslim states have been progressively attacked, subverted and neutralised: Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan If Iran is militarily and economically destroyed, who is next?

The writer is a former Pakistan ambassador to the UN

Enjoyed this story? Share it.

About the Author: Dawn is Pakistan's oldest and most widely read English-language newspaper.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia

Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.

By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Diplomacy, Opinion

Trump again cites questionable numbers related to Korea trade deal

Trump has used the trade deal to bolster his credentials back home. US President Donald Trump again cited questionable numbers on Tuesday as he touted his administration’s renegotiated free trade agreement with South Korea. Trump told the Economic Club of New York that the revised FTA, which took effect early this year, doubled the number of American cars that can be sold in South Korea under US standards and extended American tariffs on Korean pickup trucks by another 20 years to 2041. He then took a swipe at the previous administration of Barack Obama, which negotiated the original agreement. “The deal from the previous admini

By The Korea Herald
November 13, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

Uncertainty persists on US – China trade deal

This despite Trump’s comments that US and China close to trade deal. US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday (Nov 12) that the United States and China are close to a trade deal, but made clear that the prospect of tariffs was still on the table, with a warning that the US would raise tariffs on China if no trade deal was reached. His speech at the Economic Club of New York was closely watched by Wall Street but offered no new details on any signing of a much-touted “Phase One” preliminary trade deal with China. China, said President Trump, was dying to make a deal with their “supply chains cracking very badly” almost two years into the trade war. “We’re the ones deciding whether or not we want t

By The Straits Times
November 13, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

India should have signed up for RCEP

India has decided to put a halt on its joining the largest planned free trade area. Had India not pulled out at the last minute from signing the deal during the 3rd summit of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in Bangkok on November 4, the RCEP would have been the largest free trade area in the world so far—comprising of 16 Asia Pacific countries that house 3.4 billion people, and constituting one-third of the global gross domestic product (GDP) and 40 percent of global trade. Ten member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) along with Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea fo

By The Kathmandu Post
November 13, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

Ayodhya verdict is silent on why Muslims must prove exclusive possession of site

The Indian court has deprived Muslims of the disputed plot because they couldn’t show exclusive possession before 1857. On page 215 of the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid verdict, delivered by a five-judge bench on Saturday, the Supreme Court makes a crucial statement of logic: “It is true that in matters of faith and belief, the absence of evidence may not be evidence of absence.” But in its final findings, the court contradicted this same logic. The crux of the judgment that India has awaited since 1949 is that Muslims failed to show unimpeded possession of the disputed site in Ayodhya between 1528, when the mosque was supposedly built by Mughal emperor Babur, and 1857, when, after a clash between Muslims and Hindus, a railing was erected between the inner and outer courtyards at the disputed site. The inner courtyard is where the mosque demolished by Hindutva mobs in 1992 stood. The outer courtyard has se

By Dawn
November 12, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

Myanmar sued for genocide

On behalf of OIC, Gambia files the case at Int’l Court of Justice seeking orders to stop atrocities on Rohingyas immediately.  The Gambia has filed a case at the United Nations’ top court, accusing Myanmar of committing genocide against its Rohingya Muslim minority, more than two years after some 750,000 Rohingyas fled a military crackdown in the Rakhine State. “We have just submitted our application to the ICJ under the Genocide Convention,” Gambian Justice Minister Abubacarr Tambadou said at a news conference yesterday in The Hague, where the court is based. “The aim is to get Myanmar to account for its action against its own people: the Rohingya. It is a shame for our generation that we do nothing while genocide is unfolding right under our own eyes,” he said. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), also known as the World Court, is the U

By Daily Star
November 12, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

HK must hold the line, uphold democracy in elections

An editorial in China’s State Run Media. “Deliberate violence”, said the Greek philosopher Heraclitus, “is more to be quenched than a fire.” Although Hong Kong elections have traditionally been relatively peaceful affairs, this has now changed. After the anti-extradition protests morphed into urban guerrilla warfare, every institution is now at risk. A culture of violence has now taken hold, buttressed by a willingness to use crude intimidation of others, whether in politics, the universities, or on the streets. The latest victim of this phenomenon is legislator Junius Ho Kwan-yiu. Out campaigning for a District Council seat in Tuen Mun, he was stabbed in the chest by a stranger. The crime was obviously pre-meditated, and the suspected offender will hopefully be charged with attempted murder. Shortly before the attack, Ho’s local office had been hit by fire bom

By China Daily
November 11, 2019