See More on Facebook

Diplomacy, Opinion

Opinion: War with Iran benefits no one


Written by

Updated: June 24, 2019

The drumbeat of war in the Persian/Arab Gulf has become incessant in the past few weeks Oil tankers have been mysteriously damaged A US surveillance drone has been shot down by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) Missiles have struck Saudi installations and Basra sites The US has sent a naval armada and 2,500 additional troops to the Gulf, intensified economic pressure and built the legal grounds for military operations against Iran

The world is waking up to the potentially devastating consequences for the region and the world of this professedly unwanted yet inexorable march towards a US-Iran war

The conflict may be ‘limited’ at the outset but could escalate rapidly, eg further attacks on oil tankers in the Hormuz, US ‘retaliation’ against IRGC gunboats and other naval vessels, Iranian missile strikes against US and GCC targets accompanied by attacks by Iranian or Shia militias against US personnel and installations in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and elsewhere, and missile and rocket attacks against Israel and Israeli-occupied territories by Hezbollah and other Iran-allied groups To avoid such anticipated attacks, the US, and possibly Israel, could resort to major pre-emptive aerial strikes to eliminate Iran’s missile and naval capabilities

However, even if such strikes are successful, Iran is unlikely to capitulate (if its resilience during the Iran-Iraq war is any indication) Under external attack, there will be no popular movement in Iran to oust the regime (although President Rouhani and the ‘moderates’ may be replaced by the hardliners and the IRGC) To remove it, the US and its allies would need to launch a full-fledged invasion of Iran Given the experience of Iraq and Afghanistan, neither Washington nor any regional power, has the stomach for it

Even if Russia and China, which America has designated as its ‘rivals’, do not intervene, directly or indirectly, on Tehran’s behalf, the end-state of a war with Iran will be: one, chaos within Iran, with the possible eruption of ethnic insurgencies in its peripheral provinces; two, a war of attrition led by the remnants Iranian regular forces and Shia militias against US and allied forces and installations across the region; three, Tehran-inspired intensification of the conflicts in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan; four, an Iranian denunciation of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and eventual development of nuclear weapons; five, a major and extended interruption in oil exports from the Gulf, pushing prices to unprecedented heights, and six, a global economic recession

War is thus a ‘lose-lose’ option for all those who would be involved in this conflict and even those who are not Regardless of the culpability of those responsible for the reckless actions that have brought the region to the brink of war, common sense, and a sense of self-preservation dictate that the principal parties walk back from the precipice

Any endeavour towards de-escalation will need to address the major causes of the crisis and respond to the concerns of all parties Each of the elements of the current confrontation — nuclear proliferation, regional conflicts, economic sanctions, tanker and missile attacks — have been addressed, if at all, in piecemeal fashion so far They are all interlinked and must be resolved comprehensively and concomitantly

A first step away from the brink could be acceptance of the UN secretary general’s proposal to hold an independent inquiry into the tanker attacks of May and June All parties should pledge not to resort to the use of force while this investigation is under way

Simultaneously, the UN Security Council should demand: one, a halt to the Houthi missile attacks against Saudi and Emirati targets, two, a general ceasefire in Yemen; three, the opening of all avenues for the supply of humanitarian help to the Yemeni population; and four, the initiation of a summit-level dialogue between the main parties to evolve a political solution to the conflict

Most importantly, the EU, the three European parties to the Iran nuclear deal, and Russia and China, with the support of the UN secretary general and General Assembly, should undertake a high-level diplomatic initiative to: 1) convince Tehran not to breach the limitations, especially on nuclear enrichment levels and stocks, contained in the deal; 2) set up an international mechanism (an Instex plus) to enable Iran to conduct trade as per the terms of the deal; 3) press the US to lift the unilateral sanctions it has imposed on Iran, at least progressively in response to reciprocal confidence-building measures undertaken by Iran; 4) secure Iran’s agreement to discuss and address the widespread concern regarding its policies across the region, including in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen and Afghanistan; and 5) establish a mechanism to discuss a missile-and-arms-control regime in the region

Despite Ayatollah Khamanei’s public rejection of talks with the US during the Japanese prime minister’s recent mediatory visit to Tehran, Iran is unlikely to have closed all doors to dialogue Some of Foreign Minister Javad Zarif’s recent statements have mentioned openness to discuss all issues (He once told me that Iran had proposed a ‘grand bargain’ to the US in 2001-2; the response they received was Iran’s inclusion in the ‘axis of evil’ in president George W Bush’s September 2002 speech at the UN General Assembly)

The Trump administration appears to be internally conflicted on its Iran policy There is a general perception that hardliners — National Security Adviser John Bolton, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo — are pushing President Trump towards a war with Iran But Trump may be using them,

wittingly or otherwise, as part of his ‘art of the deal’ negotiating strategy His main objective is to secure re-election in 2020 ‘Success’ in dealing with Iran would enhance his electoral prospects But a war with an uncertain outcome is a risky strategy He has notably responded cautiously to the drone downing A major diplomatic success would be a preferable option for Trump

Although Iran is not always an easy neighbour, Pakistan has multiple reasons to prevent a war against it Over the past 40 years, several ‘independent’ Muslim states have been progressively attacked, subverted and neutralised: Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan If Iran is militarily and economically destroyed, who is next?

The writer is a former Pakistan ambassador to the UN

Enjoyed this story? Share it.

About the Author: Dawn is Pakistan's oldest and most widely read English-language newspaper.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia

Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.

By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Diplomacy, Opinion

S. Korea, Japan to hold working-level talks

The two countries have not pursued diplomacy since a high level talk failed earlier this month. South Korea’s Foreign Ministry announced Thursday that an official handling Asia-Pacific affairs will visit Japan to meet his counterpart amid mounting tensions between the two countries. Kim Jung-han, director general for Asian and Pacific Affairs at Seoul’s Foreign Ministry, will meet Shigeki Takizaki to discuss matters of mutual interest, the ministry said in a press release. This is Kim’s first one-on-one meeting with Takizaki, who replaced Kenji Kanasugi as head of Japan’s Foreign Ministry’s Southeast and Southwest Asian affairs departmen

By The Korea Herald
September 20, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

PM Imran expresses Pakistan’s resolve to stand with Saudi Arabia in face of threat to security

Saudi Arabia say they were attacked by Iranian drones. Prime Minister Imran Khan on Thursday met with Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz and expressed Pakistan’s resolve to stand with Saudi Arabia “in the event of a threat to its sanctity and security”, a statement by the Prime Minister’s Office said. The premier condemned the recent drone attacks on Saudi Arabia’s oil facilities and assured King Salman of Pakistan’s continued support to the Kingdom. According to the PMO statement, Prime Minister Imran also briefed King Salman on the current situation in occupied Kashmir. “King Salman reiterated the Kingdom’s solidarity and long-held support on the Kashmir issue,” said the statement. The two leaders discussed relations between the two countries as well as the regional and global political situation. They also talked about other matt

By Dawn
September 20, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

China demands US drop bill on HK

China has accused the United States of meddling in the past. China on Thursday demanded the United States stop advancing a Hong Kong-related bill and its interference in Hong Kong affairs on Thursday, after US lawmakers held a news conference to back the bill. US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a bipartisan group of members of Congress held the media event on the “Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019”. Hong Kong separatists, including Joshua Wong Chifung and Denise Ho Wan-see, attended the event. China is strongly dissatisfied and firmly opposed to the move, Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said on Thursday. Pelosi and other US politicians “failed to distinguish right from wrong” despite China repeatedly expressing its solemn stance over US meddling in Hong Kong affairs, Geng said. They were “brutally interfering in China

By China Daily
September 20, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

Pakistan denies India’s request for use of airspace by Modi for flight to Germany

The latest in a series of escalating diplomatic tit-for-tats. The government on Wednesday announced its decision not to grant India’s request for Prime Minister Narendra Modi to use Pakistani airspace for his flight to Germany. Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said that the decision has been made “keeping in view the situation in occupied Kashmir”. “A request was received from India saying that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi seeks to use Pakistani airspace for an overflight on the 20th to Germany and wishes to use the same for a return flight on the 28th,” said the foreign minister in a video statement. “Keeping in view the situation in occupied Kashmir and India’s attitude witnessed in the tyranny and oppression [suffered by Kashmiris] and the violations of rights in the region, we have decided not to grant this request,” he said.

By Dawn
September 19, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

Pakistan strongly condemns India’s remarks about ‘having control’ of AJK one day

The remarks were made by India’s foreign minister. India’s foreign minister said on Tuesday that Azad Jammu and Kashmir belongs to India and that he expected New Delhi to gain physical control over it one day, raising the rhetoric over the territorial dispute. In response, Pakistan strongly condemned and rejected “the inflammatory and irresponsible remarks made by the Indian External Affairs Minister regarding Pakistan and AJK”, according to a statement by the Foreign Office. The statement also called upon the international community to take note of the “aggressive posturing”. India claims the heavily populated Kashmir Valley while Pakistan has a wedge of territory in the west of the disputed region — Azad Jammu and Kashmir. “Our position on [Azad Kashmir] is, has always been and will always be very clear. [Azad Kashmir] is part of India and we expec

By Dawn
September 18, 2019

Diplomacy, Opinion

Japan officially removed from South Korea’s whitelist

Seoul has threatened the move for weeks. South Korea excluded Japan from its export controls whitelist Wednesday in retaliation for Tokyo’s earlier decision to remove Seoul from its list of favored trade partners, as bilateral relations have slumped to the lowest levels since normalizing diplomatic ties in 1965. “The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy has published the revision of the nation’s trade controls on strategic items in an official gazette and it took effect from Wednesday,” said the ministry spokesperson through a statement. Since the Aug. 12 announcement by Industry Minister Sung Yun-mo that Korea would drop Japan as a preferred trading partner, the ministry has completed the necessary administrative steps, such as soliciting opinions from the public and submitting the revised rules to the Office of Legislation for review. “We have received opinions from the public throu

By The Korea Herald
September 18, 2019