See More on Facebook

Analysis, Diplomacy

India gauges international response to its Kashmir decision

Delhi’s unilateral move has been met with varying response from the international community.

Written by

Updated: August 15, 2019

India’s decided earlier this month to revoke the special status of Jammu and Kashmir state.

The state will be bifurcated it into two union territories – Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh – which will be accountable directly to the federal government.

Whether India likes it or not, its Kashmir decision has international ramifications and Modi’s government will be gauging them carefully.

That is relatively good news for India’s Narendra Modi-led government which has staked much of its political capital on coming through on this long-promised move after winning a landslide second consecutive election in May.

United States

President Donald Trump said in a bland statement: “We are closely following the events in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. We take note of India’s announcement revising the constitutional status of Jammu and Kashmir splitting the state into two union territories.”

The US state department spokesperson amplified this hands-off attitude: “We note that India has described these actions as strictly an internal matter,” adding: “We call on all parties to maintain peace and stability.”

Having raised a storm of protest after having offered himself as mediator between India and Pakistan recently, which led to an official denial from New Delhi that Modi had asked him to help out, Trump seems to have been prevailed upon by the state department not to get involved in what is seen as an intractable issue given the positions of both sides.

Washington’s keenness for a complete withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, for which it needs the help and support of Pakistan, is increasingly being de-linked from its strategic, economic and military ties with New Delhi.

The US’ muted reaction to India’s Kashmir move is the latest example of that.


China in its response has said it is “seriously concerned” about the current situation in Kashmir and called on India and Pakistan to “peacefully resolve relevant disputes through dialogue to safeguard regional peace and stability.”

“The parties concerned should exercise restraint and act with caution, especially to avoid actions that unilaterally change the status quo and exacerbate tension,” a foreign ministry spokesperson said.

Pretty much proforma.

The twist, however, was on Ladakh.

Beijing issued a separate statement objecting to the formation of the union territory of Ladakh, highlighting China’s claims over the area.

“China opposes India’s inclusion of Chinese territory in the western section of the China-India boundary under its administrative jurisdiction. The recent unilateral revision of domestic laws by the Indian side continues to undermine China’s territorial sovereignty, which is unacceptable,” the statement read.

India was urged “to be cautious in its words and actions on the boundary issue,” for good measure. (China and India have 3,488-km long Line of Actual Control (LAC) between them and have held 21 rounds of talks so far to resolve the boundary dispute.)

The Indian riposte was swift, with the foreign ministry iterating that the move was an “internal matter concerning the territory of India…. India does not comment on the internal affairs of other countries and similarly expects other countries to do likewise.”

But the penny had dropped for the Indian side.

While the Indian foreign ministry emphasised that both sides have agreed to maintain peace and tranquillity in border areas on the basis of the relevant agreements, Foreign Minister S Jaishankar followed up this conciliatory approach on his three-day visit to Beijing (Sunday-Tuesday).

He told his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi on Monday that “differences between the two countries should not be allowed to become disputes”.

He followed it up on Tuesday by reassuring Wang in a bilateral that the change in Kashmir’s status was a “purely internal, administrative matter of India” to ensure better governance.

“It has no implication for the boundaries with China… neither the external boundaries of India or the LAC with China. India is not raising any additional territorial claims,” he said in a direct attempt to assuage Beijing’s concerns.

He also headlined the importance New Delhi ascribes to ties with Beijing in an interview with Xinhua – “As the two largest developing countries and emerging economies, cooperation between India and China is of great importance not only bilaterally but to the world. We must cooperate closely if we are to realize the Asian century.”

How far China is mollified by this outreach and how it deals with pressure on it by ally Pakistan to support Islamabad’s attempts to raise the issue of Kashmir’s status change at multilateral fora including the UNSC remains to be seen.

But there is a sense in both capitals that the Indo-China entente initiated by Xi-Modi needs to be built on and not allowed to be held hostage by Kashmir.


Islamabad has been livid ever since the announcement was made and has ratcheted up the diplomatic pressure to follow its condemnation of India’s new Kashmir policy.

Within 24 hours of the move taking effect, Islamabad recalled its High Commissioner from India, downgraded diplomatic ties and suspended all bilateral agreements including those covering trade, transit and transportation.

Symbolic moves such as marking its Independence (National) Day on August 14 as “Kashmir Solidarity Day” and scathing speeches from the Prime Minister and other senior establishment figures describing New Delhi’s Kashmir move as the coming to fruition of the Indian ruling dispensation’s “Nazi-like ideology” that “targets Muslims” have also been the norm.

The Imran Khan administration, which has cross-party support on Kashmir, is trying hard to get the world to join its condemnation of India but without too much to show for it for till now.

Pakistan has written to the United Nations Security Council to take up the issue but Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi himself is downplaying expectations of a great success on that front.

Islamabad’s strategy is clearly to portray India as a threat to regional stability and a rights oppressor for the “tyranny it has unleashed on Kashmiris”.

There has been some purchase for Pakistan’s stand in China albeit Beijing is more concerned with Ladakh as opposed to Kashmir, within the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and among pressure groups such as British MPs who have sizeable Pakistani-origin voters in their constituencies.

But official support for Islamabad’s stand on the issue have so far not been forthcoming from any quarter.

South Asia/Other Powers

Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Nepal, Maldives and Bangladesh have all either maintained a studied silence or described the constitutional amendment and bifurcation into smaller administrative units of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir as an internal matter of India.

Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe highlighted the fact that Ladakh has now become the first Buddhist-majority territory/state in India.

Russia strongly backed India’s move terming it “well within the framework of the Indian Constitution” while the UK said it is “watching the situation and supports appeals for all parties to remain calm”.

Iran too kept itself equidistant saying it expects India and Pakistan – “as its regional friends and partners” – to adopt peaceful methods and dialogue to take effective steps to protect the interests of the people in the region.

Says Akshay Mathur, Director of Research, Gateway House, Indian Council on Global Relations, Mumbai: “The prime reason for the subdued reactions and even support for India is that its Kashmir decision hasn’t touched any international boundaries. Neither the Line of Control (LoC) with Pakistan nor the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China is impacted. It is genuinely India’s internal affair and within its sovereign domain.

“Secondly, diplomacy is a sum of micro efforts and New Delhi has been intensely engaging with the major powers and its neighbours, including and especially China, for over five years. The first signs of that effort paying off can be seen as ties earlier seen as problematic have become genuinely broad-based with multiple levels of engagement. It is not just about one issue any more and that leads to accommodation on both sides.

“Lastly, there’s the fact is that India is increasingly seen as a powerful and not weak democracy with an economy that is potentially a magnet for many players to engage with for mutual prosperity. New Delhi is in that sense carved out space for itself to take robust internal decisions if needed while fulfilling its responsibilities as a stabilising regional power.”


Enjoyed this story? Share it.

About the Author:

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia

Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.

By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Analysis, Diplomacy

Hong Kong adds another dimension to US-China trade war

Hong Kong’s has become another consideration for Xi and Trump in their ongoing trade dispute. The United States and China have been embroiled in a trade war for almost two years with reciprocal tariffs and fiery rhetoric coming from both sides. Both economies have suffered and the world’s two largest economies both face the looming threat of recession. China, in addition to a tenuous economic situation is also facing more woes in Hong Kong, a Chinese territory that is self-governed. Protesters have taken to the streets in the island-territory after a proposed extradition law was publicly opposed. The protests have evolved beyond the initial grievances to long-held anxieties over the economy, living space and, ultimately, rule by Beijing. As the pro-democracy protests gather steam and threaten to become more widespread and violent, the United States has involved itself and ad

By Cod Satrusayang
August 16, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

Why did Karachi sink in the rain?

The city’s topography has been altered without any regard to the overall form of the megapolis. As per the Meteorological Department’s near accurate prediction, Karachi experienced torrential rain this month. 27 people died and many more were injured. The situation was compounded by Eidul Azha that was being celebrated at the same time. Scores of cattle markets were set up in different locations across the city in addition to the central outlet along the Super Highway. Poor animals and their hapless keepers had to face a tough ordeal. Prices fell down sharply as animals began to fall sick due to the downpour and the filth. The rain caused a complete breakdown of urban life. Poor design and management of roads, drainage, intersections, underground sewers and sidewalks caused unparalleled chaos and

By Dawn
August 16, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

Moon urges Japan to choose ‘path of dialogue and cooperation’

Japan and South Korea have been locked in an increasingly ugly trade spat. President Moon Jae-in said Thursday that Seoul will cooperate with Tokyo if it retracts its recent trade restrictions, stressing the importance of international cooperation and free trade. “Within the realm of the international division of labor, if any country weaponizes a sector where it has a comparative advantage, the peaceful free trade order will inevitably suffer damages,” Moon said in his Liberation Day speech. “Better late than never. If Japan chooses the path of dialogue and cooperation, we will gladly join hands. We will strive with Japan to create an East

By The Korea Herald
August 16, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

China will quell Hong Kong protests that show signs of terrorism: Chinese ambassador to UK

China has previously said that the protests have bordered on terrorism. China will use its power to quell Hong Kong protests if the situation deteriorates further after some protesters have shown signs of terrorism, China’s ambassador to London said on Thursday (Aug 15). “Should the situation in Hong Kong deteriorate further… the central government will not sit on its hands and watch,” Ambassador Liu Xiaoming told reporters at a news conference in London. “We have enough solutions and enough power within the limits of (the) Basic Law to quell any unrest swiftly,” Mr Liu said. “Their moves are severe and violent offences, and already shows signs of terrorism.” He added: “The central gove

By The Straits Times
August 16, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

UNSC to hold ‘closed door’ meeting on India’s Kashmir move: Reports

The meeting will be held at Pakistan’s request. The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) will reportedly hold a “closed door” meeting to discuss India’s move to revoke Article 37, that had granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir. UNSC President Joanna Wronecka told reporters on Wednesday said that they would discuss “the Jammu and Kashmir situation behind closed doors most likely on August 16”, according to media reports. The development comes after Pakistan wrote a formal letter to the UNSC president calling for an emergency meeting of the UNSC to discuss India’s move to revoke the special status to Jammu and Kashmir. The letter was sent through Permanent Representative Maleha Lodhi to convene the meeting. “I have requested in the letter that a special meeting of the Security Council should be called to discuss those actions of India which we consider as illegal and aga

By The Statesman
August 16, 2019

Analysis, Diplomacy

China, the United States and the story of agriculture

China says the US responsible for its farmers’ woes. Editor’s Note: Last week the Commerce Ministry said Chinese enterprises have halted the purchase of US agricultural products following Washington’s threat to impose 10 percent tariffs on another $300 billion of Chinese goods. Two experts share their views on the issue with China Daily’s Yao Yuxin. Excerpts follow: Declining exports to hit US farmers The Chinese enterprises’ decision to suspend the purchase of US agricultural products, mainly soybean, dairy products, sorghum and pork, will deal a fresh blow to farmers and traders in the United States. The escalating trade conflict between the world’s two largest economies has slashed US exports of farm produce to China, which used to be the largest importer of US soybean. China imported $9.1 billion worth of US farm produce last year, down fr

By China Daily
August 16, 2019