See More on Facebook


Anti-corruption body now key political battleground

Rally calling for creation of anti-graft body held in Korea.

Written by

Updated: October 28, 2019

A large group of liberal protesters gathered near the National Assembly in Yeouido on Saturday chanting, “We the people must change the prosecution.”

Among their key demands was the creation of an independent body to investigate corruption allegations involving senior government officials.

Similar calls also reverberated in front of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office in Seocho-dong, southern Seoul.

Protests were also held by conservatives in Yeouido and Seocho-dong, protesting the proposed anti-corruption investigation body. On Friday, leaders of the main opposition Liberty Korea Party joined a rally calling for the abolition of a bill seeking to create an independent corruption investigation body and the resignation of President Moon Jae-in, among others.

The consecutive weekend rallies by those for and against establishing an anti-corruption investigation body highlight the widening gulf between the ruling party and the opposition bloc.

Conservatives fear unchecked power of new body

More people support the establishment of an anti-corruption body than oppose it. According to Realmeter’s latest poll on Oct. 18, 51 percent of those surveyed said they favor the new body, while 41 percent opposed it.

However, legislators across the aisle do not see eye-to-eye on the proposed independent anti-corruption body and more broadly, how to achieve prosecutorial reforms.

The prosecution is alleged to have frequently mishandled corruption charges involving senior officials across all branches of the government. Prosecutors were seen to be lenient when investigating powerful politicians, tycoons or one of their own.

Liberals blame the exclusive power of prosecutors to investigate and indict people accused of wrongdoing, and the fact that no other government agency can check their abuse of power. They are therefore pressing for an independent anti-corruption body headed by a Cabinet minister.

Conservatives question the unchecked powers of the new body. More troubling, they point out, is that it can also demand the police or prosecution hand over an open case.

They are also unhappy with the composition of the proposed new body and the charges it can press. The bill put forward by the liberals mandates the president name the head from two candidates shortlisted by a separate committee, most of whose members are government officials. Hence, the conservatives doubt the independence of the proposed body.

They also worry that it can press charges not limited to corruption against senior public servants, such as abuse of power and dereliction of duty. They fear the agency could also have the power to charge an incumbent judge.

“Judges could face dereliction of duty charges for a prolonged trial, when in fact they need more time to deliberate a case,” said Cho Jae-yeon, a Supreme Court justice, at a recent parliamentary audit, adding that judges may then shy away from carrying out their impartial duties.

Liberal supporters allay concerns

Supporters of the anti-corruption body argue a committee, set up under the anti-corruption body to decide whom to indict, will keep it in check. They say the committee would comprise citizens over 20 years old and without a license to practice law or legal education, much like the grand jury in the US.

Conservatives, however, are reluctant to accept nonlegal experts. Currently, South Korean courts do not observe a jury trial.

“Deciding on indictment requires professional expertise in law. You need to be highly trained to make that judgment,” said Lee Ho-sun, a professor of law at Kookmin University.

Also, liberals say the anti-corruption body would be less politicized if the parliament’s consent is required before the president names its head. But conservatives dismiss that argument because the candidates are shortlisted by a committee dominated by sitting government officials.

Is it unconstitutional?

Conservatives argue the proposed body is unconstitutional.

The anti-corruption body would single out high-ranking officials for investigation. However, Article 11 of South Korea’s Constitution prohibits discriminating people based on position or their rank. Conservatives believe the proposed body violates the Constitution as long as it treats senior government officials differently from others.

“Senior public officials are in a way special, but we’re talking about criminal punishment here. We need the same procedures for all during investigations,” said Kim Sang-kyum, a professor of law at Dongguk University.

“If we don’t make sure that happens, then it’s a violation of Article 11 of the Constitution that stipulates ‘no discrimination based on one’s position or rank,’” he added.

Some legal experts, however, opine otherwise.

“The fact that senior rank officials are subject to different procedures alone does not justify the complaints,” said Cha Jina, a law professor at Korea University.

“We need to look at how the parliament will identify those high ranking officials and, particularly, if the probe will be objective,” she said.

“If those senior public servants don’t get the same fair and independent trial under the new body, then it will be a breach of the Constitution because the equal rights article entitles them to one.”

Will the bills be put to vote?

In April, the National Assembly fast-tracked a batch of proposed bills, allowing them to be put to a full floor vote without the approval of the relevant committees.

The ruling Democratic Party maintains the parliament should vote on the bills this week, but the conservative Liberty Korea Party, which refused to fast-track the bill, remains adamantly against it.

The National Assembly faces an impasse, as the Democratic Party has insisted on passing the anti-corruption body bill first before any other bills on the fast track, and all other parties are objecting to it.

It is not clear whether the parliament will be able to break the deadlock and bring the bills to the floor, but if the one on the new anti-corruption body is passed, it will reshape how South Korea’s once almighty prosecution exercises its power.

By Choi Si-young (

Enjoyed this story? Share it.

The Korea Herald
About the Author: The Korea Herald is the nation’s largest English-language daily and the country’s sole member of the Asia News Network.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia

Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.

By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here


Dr M: Cabinet reshuffle, possibly before Apec

Malaysia’s ruling party suffered heavily in a recent bi-election. A Cabinet reshuffle must take place, said Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. The Prime Minister said that there will be some ministers who will be dropped but added that it will not be today or tomorrow. “Very likely before Malaysia hosts the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) summit next year,” said Dr Mahathir. Admitting that reshuffling would not be a solution to recover the waning popularity of Pakatan Harapan ruling coalition, as reflected in the recent Tanjung Piai by-election defeat, Dr Mahathir said it has to be done anyway. Pakatan received its worst by-election defeat in Tanjung Piai when its Bersatu candidate lost by more than 15,000 votes to MCA of Barisan Nasional on Nov 16. He said that the reshuffle should not be “radical” so as to affect the preparations of Malaysia to host Ap

By The Star
November 21, 2019


Court turns thumbs down on Thanathorn

The opposition leader loses his MP status. The Constitutional Court ruled on Wednesday (November 20) that Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, leader of the Future Forward Party, lost his status as a member of Parliament on May 23, having registered to run in the March election while still holding shares in V Luck Media, in violation of the law. The court cited Articles 98 and 42 of the 2017 Constitution and the Organic Act on Election to the House of Representatives in characterising Thanathorn as prohibited from being elected as an MP. The Election Commission brought the matter to court, accusing him of still holding 675,000 shares in his family-owned media company when he registered his candidacy in the general election. Thanathorn failed to prove that he had transferred all shares to his mother, Somporn Juangroongruangkit, before registering.

By The Nation (Thailand)
November 21, 2019


Huawei to match Google’s mobile services by Q1 2020

The company to support more Android apps on its phones. Huawei may soon be able to offer Android developers a full range of the essential mobile services required for their apps as the ones provided by Google. This would allow more Android apps to work on new Huawei phones affected by a ban that forbids the use of Google mobile services on these handsets. Mr Zhang Ping’an, president of Huawei Consumer Cloud Service told The Straits Times in an interview at Huawei’s Asia-Pacific Developer Day last Wednesday (Nov 13) that Huawei Mobile Services can “replace 90 per cent of Google Mobile Services by December”. These mobile services from Google and Huawei are used by developers to enable key functions in their mobile apps to, for

By The Straits Times
November 21, 2019


Moon says volunteer military system needs time

The president says South Korea will transition to a volunteer army. South Korea needs to move to a volunteer military system, but the switch from the current conscription system will need time and preparation, President Moon Jae-in said Tuesday. “(A volunteer system) is something our society must move toward. But at present, the conditions are not right to introduce a volunteer system, (the change) needs to be planned in the mid- to long-term,” Moon said, speaking in a live televised question-and-answer session with 300 selected civilians. Moon said that measures such as increasing the number of professional soldiers and improving military har

By The Korea Herald
November 20, 2019


Beijing’s comments on HK court decision could signal direct intervention

Beijing has rejected a Hong Kong court decision. China has firmly rejected the Hong Kong High Court’s decision to overturn a controversial mask ban aimed at quelling violent protests, prompting experts to say the central government could soon act to ensure its constitutional authority over Hong Kong is not challenged. China’s Parliament and Cabinet both issued statements early on Tuesday (Nov 19) morning that the ruling challenged the authority of both the Hong Kong authorities and the central government. The response came a day after the city’s High Court ruled that th

By The Straits Times
November 20, 2019


What is Oplan Tokhang and why is it in the news?

A particular phrase has popped up a number of times in news from the Philippines in the past several days that is probably a mystery to much of the world. That phrase is Oplan Tokhang, a concept that is directly related to the country’s drug war. Discussions around this idea will be something to keep an eye on in the coming weeks and months. What is Oplan Tokhang? First, what does it mean? The word tokhang, is a made-up portmanteau of the local words for knock (tok) and plead (hangyo) and describes police operations that were launched by the Duterte administration in July of 2016 that involved officers going door to door to root out drug-related offenders. The phrase has become synonymous with the Duterte administration’s notoriously brutal war on drugs, with the word tokhang becoming directly associated with the killings r

By Quinn Libson
November 20, 2019