See More on Facebook

Diplomacy, Economics

India should have signed up for RCEP

India has decided to put a halt on its joining the largest planned free trade area.


Written by

Updated: November 13, 2019

Had India not pulled out at the last minute from signing the deal during the 3rd summit of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in Bangkok on November 4, the RCEP would have been the largest free trade area in the world so far—comprising of 16 Asia Pacific countries that house 3.4 billion people, and constituting one-third of the global gross domestic product (GDP) and 40 percent of global trade. Ten member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) along with Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea form the RCEP, also known as the ASEAN+6, have been attempting to integrate regional trade (including other possible tenets of economic integration like cross-border investments) since 2012. Incidentally, however, it gained the latest momentum only recently, after China put additional effort to implement the RCEP free trade agreement framework in the aftermath of its escalated trade war with the United States. Of course, China needs to think of new markets so that it can keep its factories running.

Despite India pulling out, the hope that a deal will be reached is still alive. The signing date of the charter has been postponed to the beginning of 2020, ostensibly not to leave India out. The joint leaders’ statement issued on November 4 not only recognised the fact that India has significant outstanding issues yet to be resolved, but all participating countries also vowed to ‘work together to resolve these issues in a mutually satisfactory way’. In all likelihood, the deal will be inked early next year by the other countries, even if India cannot be brought on board. Interestingly though, China, this time around, is very keen to bring India along.

India’s concerns

India has both explicit and implicit reasons to reject the current draft of the 20-chapter agreement. Indian policy-makers are not entirely convinced that the deal would help reduce its fast burgeoning trade deficit with 11 out of the 15 other countries. The deficit accounted for a whopping $105 billion in 2018, of which trade with China alone constituted $53 billion. In fact, given Indian products lacking a competitive edge, both in quality and price, New Delhi is apprehensive of a further worsening of the trade gap as more competitive goods are likely to flood into its market after it signs the free trade agreement. India has major market-related concerns on the following five sectors: e-commerce, industries (mainly steel and electronics), agribusiness, dairy products and fast-moving consumer goods.

The Indian authorities fear that foreign exchange reserves could be unsustainably drained, once the electronic payment gateway—one of the instruments being used to implement the free trade agreement—is opened. The draining of reserves would put macroeconomic stability at constant risk. Cheap Chinese steel and electronic goods, now facing the heat of the US tariff, might kill peer industries in India. Nepal’s southern neighbour also fears large-scale Australian agribusinesses and dairy products from New Zealand uprooting the mostly traditional, underinvested family-run and subsistence-based agriculture and animal husbandry sectors. On the consumer packaged goods sector, the scale of production has been one of the major constraints for India. Many of the industries are likely to be soon shut down due to fierce competition from these regional players. This, in turn, may make a significant dent on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ‘Make in India’ initiative.

The implicit reasons for India’s rejection of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership are perhaps more potent than the explicit ones mentioned above. The first and foremost, India has started to see the entire framework increasingly becoming an instrument handy only to China—to advance its mercantilist interest at the cost of the geostrategic ambitions of India. Second, India is panicked about the potential compromise of fair free-market practices by Chinese protectionism.

Third, India believes in a unique hypothesis that China—by making the regional framework a conduit—would sell its products and components to India under the manufacturing labels of other RCEP countries like Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam where Chinese factories are now relocating themselves to take advantage of the cheaper labour costs. And finally, India sees the unhindered access to domestic trade data generated in the course of market transactions as a potential security threat. In the proposed charter, India is looking to ensure the confidentiality of such data or limiting it to domestic use only. Such electronically generated data, analysed by artificial intelligence, is now treated globally as precious information. It has been used successfully to track and predict consumer behaviour and has influenced product design and marketing.

For all these reasons, Prime Minister Modi’s decision to opt out from the deal was hailed by the Indian media and intelligentsia alike. But India’s choice does not seem to have duly considered the whole gamut of issues and implications. For example, if India’s interest is to contain China from monopolising the RCEP framework, wouldn’t its presence have been more effective to achieve that objective? A subgroup of democratic countries like India, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand together in the RCEP itself would have been in a far better position to discipline China if it chose to transgress. More importantly, what will happen to Modi’s flagship ‘look East’ foreign policy paradigm if he preferred to withdraw from such an overarching regional economic integration framework? And, in the long run, India’s competitive advantage will not improve if its firms are not tested through international competition.

Why does this matter to Nepal?

An obvious question for Nepal would be: How does the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or India’s participation in it, matter to Nepal? If China and India agreed to undergo strategic cooperation instead of competing for political and economic influence in the entire Asia Pacific region, it can allow this country to successfully pitch for Nepal-India-China trilateralism. If the grouping were allowed to become a real free trade zone, like the European Union, market entry into one of its member countries would effectively mean unhindered access to the entire trading bloc. Given the expansiveness of Nepal’s economic interaction with India, the latter’s participation in the framework and the ensuing expected market efficiency will likely benefit Nepal.



Enjoyed this story? Share it.


The Kathmandu Post
About the Author: The Kathmandu Post was Nepal’s first privately owned English broadsheet daily and is currently the country's leading English-language newspaper.

Eastern Briefings

All you need to know about Asia


Our Eastern Briefings Newsletter presents curated stories from 22 Asian newspapers from South, Southeast and Northeast Asia.

Sign up and stay updated with the latest news.



By providing us with your email address, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

View Today's Newsletter Here

Diplomacy, Economics

7 of 10 Filipinos worried by presence of Chinese workers

China has increased its presence in the archipelago. The rising presence of Chinese workers in the country worry seven out of 10 adult Filipinos, according to the latest Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey, as the government recently launched a crackdown against Philippine offshore gaming operators (Pogos) which mostly employ Chinese nationals. The noncommissioned survey, conducted from Sept. 27 to 30, found that 31 percent “worried a great deal,” while 39 percent are “somewhat worried.” Highest in Metro Manila The proportion of those who were worried about the increasing number of Chinese workers in the country was highest in Metro Manila at 75 percent, followed by the Visayas at 71 percent, Luzon outside Metro Manila (69 percent) and Mindanao (67 percent.) About half of the respondents agree that the rising number of Chinese workers is a threat to national secur


By Philippine Daily Inquirer
December 6, 2019

Diplomacy, Economics

Pakistan to launch Digital Pakistan Vision

Imran hopes to unleash ‘potential of youth and women’ with new venture. Prime Minister Imran Khan on Thursday said that with the introduction of the ‘Digital Pakistan Vision’, the full potential of the contribution of youth and the women to the economy will be unleashed. According to a press release from the Prime Minister Office: “The Vision sets Pakistan’s digital ambition and has been designed for the government and the private sector to work towards a digitally progressive and inclusive Pakistan.” Speaking at the launch ceremony of the initiative, the prime minister regretted not having launched it at the very beginning when his government was formed. “I should have given attention to Digital Pakistan earlier. This is the most important thing for Pakistan right now, especially its youth. The whole world is moving forward digitally and we have been l


By Dawn
December 6, 2019

Diplomacy, Economics

Huawei asks US court to overturn ban

The company is suing the FCC, the latest in a series of legal tussles. The legal battle between Huawei Technologies Co and United States government intensified on Thursday. The Chinese tech heavyweight announced a legal challenge to the US Federal Communications Commission, seeking to overturn the latter’s order that bans telecom carriers from buying the company’s equipment via federal subsidies. The move is the latest push by the world’s largest telecom equipment maker to pursue fair competition and treatment amid a slate of restrictions from Washington. Analysts said the FCC ban would have very limited impact on Huawei’s financial performance, but labeling the company as a national security threat would cause far-reaching reputational harm. In a petition filed in the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Thursday, Huawei asked the court to declare the FCC order un


By China Daily
December 6, 2019

Diplomacy, Economics

North Korea has not given up hope for nuclear talks with US yet

Kim has mentioned a possibility of a ‘Christmas’ gift. Tensions between the US and North Korea have heightened as the two sides exchanged threats and bellicose rhetoric of possible military actions if necessary, amid their stalled nuclear talks. But they appear to have no intention to wind up their diplomacy at least for the next few weeks, experts said. On Wednesday, Heino Klinck, US deputy assistant secretary of defense for East Asia, said the US has been refraining from responding to every single one of North On Wednesday, US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for East Asia Heino Klinck said the


By The Korea Herald
December 6, 2019

Diplomacy, Economics

Thailand looks to become LNG hub

Energy Minister Sontirat Songtijirawong declared at a conference. The Energy Policy Administration Committee today (December 4) acknowledged the guidelines for turning Thailand into the regional trading hub of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The guidelines came about from a study assigned by the government-appointed energy reform committee to PTT. Energy Minister Sontirat Songtijirawong said that the move was estimated to generate Bt165 billion for Thailand’s economy between 2020 and 2030. The country is expected to start full commercial trading late next year or early in 2021. Thailand has potential to become the regional hub due to its high demand of LNG and its geographical location as the centre of countries with high LNG demand, namely China, India, Japan, Cambodia, and Vietnam. Moreover, Thailand has a supportive infrastructure to serve regional LNG tradi


By The Nation (Thailand)
December 5, 2019

Diplomacy, Economics

Chinese FM to visit India this month for boundary talks

The talks were to be held in September but had to be postponed as the two sides could not find a suitable date for the meeting. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is expected to visit India later this month to hold boundary talks with National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, sources said on Wednesday. Wang, who is also a State Councillor, and Doval are the designated Special Representatives (SRs) of the two countries for the boundary talks. The talks were to be held in September but had to be postponed as the two sides could not find a suitable date for the meeting. Besides holding boundary talks with the NSA, Wang, a trusted lieutenant of Chinese President Xi Jinping, will meet External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. He will also call on Prime Minister Narendra Modi.


By The Statesman
December 5, 2019