COP29 and small nations, an urgent call for action: Kuensel

Developed nations have long championed the cause of climate action in words, but their actions continue to fall alarmingly short. Their reluctance to shoulder the responsibilities they hold in this global crisis now risks turning climate agreements into hollow gestures.

smoke-258786_1280.jpg

Thematic photo of smoke coming out of chimneys. PHOTO: PIXABAY

November 15, 2024

BANGKOK – As world leaders convene for COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, climate finance has once again become a central issue on the agenda. Yet, after nearly three decades of similar gatherings and countless pledges, the question lingers: will these promises finally lead to meaningful change, or are we simply witnessing yet another stage performance in the theatre of climate diplomacy?

Developed nations have long championed the cause of climate action in words, but their actions continue to fall alarmingly short. Their reluctance to shoulder the responsibilities they hold in this global crisis now risks turning climate agreements into hollow gestures, all while humanity stands on the precipice of disaster.

The reality is simple: developed nations built their wealth on fossil-fuel-driven economies, amassing the resources and infrastructure that elevated their global standing. Yet, when faced with the consequences of those actions—rising sea levels, erratic weather patterns, and devastating wildfires—they seem unwilling to pay the debt they owe.

The new climate finance targets, while essential, are nothing new. Calls for increased funding for climate adaptation and mitigation have been on the COP agenda for decades, and yet the flow of financial support from wealthy nations has been minimal and inconsistent. Worse still, these nations often disguise climate finance commitments as mere repackaging of existing aid, inflating their claims while doing little to meet the urgent needs of developing countries who bear the brunt of climate impacts.

This chronic underfunding is more than a budgetary failure; it represents a moral lapse.

Developing countries, particularly in the Global South, face the cruel irony of experiencing the most severe impacts of a climate crisis they did not create. Floods and droughts ravage communities, crop failures threaten food security, and entire islands are at risk of disappearing. While developed nations continue to emit greenhouse gases at disproportionate levels, they continue to display an astounding lack of urgency.

Even as they discuss climate finance, many wealthy nations still invest heavily in fossil fuels domestically, maintaining a status quo that undercuts the very goals they publicly claim to support.

This hypocrisy shows a dangerous flaw in the international climate framework. Instead of leading by example, developed countries are burdening global negotiations with endless red tape, creating a labyrinth of policies and conditions that stall real progress. The dominance of bureaucracy over action has turned climate finance into a bureaucratic facade, where endless discussions replace concrete results.

This self-serving stalling tactic is killing humanity’s chances of averting the last disaster.

True climate action demands a fundamental shift in the world order—a recalibration where developed nations acknowledge their historical responsibility and act decisively to rectify it. This means going beyond symbolic gestures and taking real steps to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, increase renewable energy investment, and fund robust climate adaptation projects in vulnerable nations.

This also means leading by example in cutting emissions, proving that sustainable development is not just an ideal but a practical path to survival.

For too long, developed nations have approached climate responsibility like a PR campaign, pushing polished pledges without the will to back them up. The longer they defer real action, the more they betray not only the developing world, but also future generations everywhere.

COP29 must not be allowed to become another hollow ritual. The world order must evolve—not for the sake of appearances, but for the sake of humanity’s future.

scroll to top