EU’s green policy a priority for Asean

Indonesia should not be too concerned about meeting the EU’s deforestation-free rule, however, if they followed the global standards.

Yvette Tanamal and A. Muh. Ibnu Aqil

Yvette Tanamal and A. Muh. Ibnu Aqil

The Jakarta Post

2022_11_21_132486_1669040873._large.jpg

Vehicles pass along a road that cuts through an oil palm plantation in Pangkalan Banteng, West Kotawaringin, Central Kalimantan, as seen in this aerial photo taken on Nov. 7, 2022.(Antara/Makna Zaeza)

January 30, 2023

JAKARTA – The European Green Deal remained among the European Union’s top priorities in both the 27-nation bloc’s 2023 ASEAN and Indonesia strategy, two senior EU diplomats told a press conference in Jakarta on Tuesday.

While its environmental stance on trade had caused heated rifts with some of the largest ASEAN member states, Brussels would ensure that other areas of cooperation could continue undisturbed, they added.

EU Ambassador to Indonesia Vincent Piket emphasized that finalizing the Indonesia-EU Comprehensive Trade Agreement (IEU-CEPA) by the end of the year would be the dominant concern of the bloc’s negotiators. He added that a total of four negotiation rounds had been scheduled for February, May, July and September.

“The economic case [for the IEU-CEPA] remains convincing,” Piket told “At the margins of the G20 [Group of Twenty] Summit in Bali, we agreed to conclude talks by the end of the year,” he said.

Over seven years in the making, the IEU-CEPA is set to count among Indonesia’s largest bilateral trade deals and is expected to advance trade, investment and tourism between the two parties.

But major roadblocks stand in the way, the most profound being the EU’s deforestation-free rule that sought to impose a penalty on any imported products linked to deforestation.

The move was received negatively by Indonesia and Malaysia, the world’s two largest palm oil producers, which deemed the policy “discriminative” toward developing countries.

But Piket made reassurances that the EU was determined to solve the issue diplomatically, adding that Brussels would boost its “technical briefings” to clear up any negative impressions over the environmental policy.

“We have lots of explaining to do, to the media and officials, [so they are] convinced that the deforestation law can be made to work,” he said.

“Indonesia’s track record to stop deforestation is marked. The cut-off date was December 2022, and there are also no penalties for what happened in the past,” the ambassador added.

Syahrul Fitra, a campaigner with Greenpeace Indonesia, said the trade agreement was still problematic because it pushed for massive commodities production, which would further exploit and endanger Indonesia’s natural resources.

However, the EU’s international regulations, such as the recent rule on deforestation-free supply chains, could still support the “green agenda” that the bloc wanted to push in the IEU-CEPA.

Syahrul said Indonesian producers should not be too concerned about meeting the EU’s deforestation-free rule if they followed global deforestation-free standards.

“The green agenda will provide ease of trade between Indonesia and the EU on commodities that [carried] the risk of deforestation and [threatened] biodiversity,” he told The Jakarta Post on Friday.

He added that the upcoming CEPA negotiations were an opportunity for Indonesia to show its commitment to the climate crisis goals.

“What we are currently lacking now is the will of the Indonesian government to be active and aggressive against rising global temperatures,” he said.

All channels

Also speaking at the Tuesday event, EU Ambassador to ASEAN Igor Driesmans said diplomacy would be used on “channels of all levels” to ensure that productive EU-ASEAN cooperation was not jeopardized, in particular to clear the air with Malaysia, which recently threatened to freeze its palm oil exports to Europe.

Malaysia, the world’s second-largest palm oil producer, said on Jan. 12 that it might stop exporting its palm oil to the EU after the bloc imposed additional import restrictions on the commodity.

Driesmans stressed it was important that disagreements over palm oil did not turn into an “irritant” that interfered with other areas of cooperation, as the EU had a broad agenda for its cooperation with ASEAN.

He added that the EU would “double down” on its efforts this year to establish Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with a number of ASEAN countries, on top of fortifying security partnerships and cooperation to realize the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP).

“In the context of [the] evolving geopolitical landscape, the EU has adopted a new Strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific,” he said. “The EU intends to increase its engagement with this region, in which we have a major existing stake and which we want to be peaceful and prosperous.”

Malaysia and Indonesia have for years been at loggerheads with the EU over its curbs on imported palm oil, which the two countries have alleged were barriers to trade and measures intended to protect the bloc’s oilseeds industry.

The EU deforestation regulation is in addition to a renewable energy directive the bloc announced in 2018, which mandates the phasing out of palm-based transportation fuels by 2030.

The bloc has also set a safety limit on food contaminant esters for palm oil that is separate from limits on soft oils derived from crops such as soybean, canola and sunflower.

Indonesia and Malaysia, which account for 85 percent of the world’s palm oil exports, have filed separate suits against the EU at the World Trade Organization over the bloc’s renewable energy directive.

Both countries have said they had taken steps to meet EU requirements, including stepping up their standards for national sustainable palm oil certification and improving environmental protection and food safety, but the bloc kept imposing new restrictions.

EU officials say the regulations do not target any one country, and are instead aimed at ensuring that the commodity’s production does not drive further deforestation and forest degradation.
At home, environmentalists have criticized Indonesia and Malaysia’s pledge to fight “discrimination” against palm oil, saying the move brings the countries’ commitment to halting deforestation into question.

Activists are worried that the move by both countries will undermine their efforts to combat deforestation.
 

scroll to top